• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Why can't I search titles for ALCAR?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 nowayout

  • Guest
  • 2,946 posts
  • 439
  • Location:Earth

Posted 11 April 2011 - 02:23 PM


ALCAR, NAC, etc., etc. return zero search results. As a result, it is impossible to search for threads with these common and useful words in their titles.

I can't do a google search on imminst thread titles, so please don't suggest that.

Could this possibly be fixed? Please!

Edited by viveutvivas, 11 April 2011 - 02:24 PM.


#2 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 1,999
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 11 April 2011 - 04:42 PM

ALCAR, NAC, etc., etc. return zero search results. As a result, it is impossible to search for threads with these common and useful words in their titles.

I can't do a google search on imminst thread titles, so please don't suggest that.

Could this possibly be fixed? Please!

I just did a search on alcar (case doesn't matter), directing it to look specifically in titles, and got five pages of hits. You can't search for NAC because our search software doesn't index strings with less than four characters. Yeah, I know, great design decision on the part of IPB, huh? A major problem with our search tool is that it seems to be rather arbitrary and capricious about what it chooses to search. It frequently wants to look in "forum help files" for some reason. You have to be sure to direct it to look in the actual forums.
  • like x 1

#3 nowayout

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,946 posts
  • 439
  • Location:Earth

Posted 11 April 2011 - 08:42 PM

Hmm, well, now it works for me too. Never mind then.

#4 chrono

  • Guest, Moderator
  • 2,444 posts
  • 801
  • Location:New England

Posted 19 April 2011 - 11:20 PM

I can't do a google search on imminst thread titles, so please don't suggest that.

Actually you can, and it's a good workaround for the annoying 4-character minimum all forum software seems to have.

site:longecity.org intitle:NAC will search for NAC in the title. Since the titles are transposed into the URL, you can also use the inurl: search function.

To search for multiple title words, use separate instances of the function: site:longecity.org intitle:NAC intitle:poll, or to search for a phrase, use quotes: site:longecity.org intitle:"NAC poll"

You can also add usernames or subforum names to the search to narrow it down further. Hope someone finds this useful...the advanced search operators are very under-appreciated, and make google a much more powerful search engine.
  • like x 2

#5 rwac

  • Member
  • 4,764 posts
  • 61
  • Location:Dimension X

Posted 20 April 2011 - 12:05 AM

site:longecity.org intitle:NAC will search for NAC in the title. Since the titles are transposed into the URL, you can also use the inurl: search function.


Actually there's a longecity google search bar near the bottom of each page, so you don't even have to type "site:longecity.org".

#6 nowayout

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,946 posts
  • 439
  • Location:Earth

Posted 20 April 2011 - 12:51 AM

I can't do a google search on imminst thread titles, so please don't suggest that.

Actually you can, and it's a good workaround for the annoying 4-character minimum all forum software seems to have.

site:longecity.org intitle:NAC will search for NAC in the title. Since the titles are transposed into the URL, you can also use the inurl: search function.

To search for multiple title words, use separate instances of the function: site:longecity.org intitle:NAC intitle:poll, or to search for a phrase, use quotes: site:longecity.org intitle:"NAC poll"

You can also add usernames or subforum names to the search to narrow it down further. Hope someone finds this useful...the advanced search operators are very under-appreciated, and make google a much more powerful search engine.


That's awesome. I eat my hat. Thank you.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users