This breakthrough produced a lot of headlines claiming "Stem Cell Breakthrough" (kind-of erroneous). It is potentially much more powerful because it involves a stem cell growth factor. One thing I learned at UABBA was that just inserting stem cells into the body and expecting miraculous results has been found to be a fool's errand. Stem cells respond to the environment they are in. Putting "young" stem cells into old tissue just causes the stem cells to "get old and die" (for lack of a better scientific way to describe it). What is needed is knowledge about what factors, what chemical signals, cause stem cells to grow and do the work of repairing damaged or worn out tissue. Teriparatide, mentioned in the article, might be one of those factors.
Not only that but stems cells will likely be attacked by T cells. Even autologus stem cells can be targets for them if they have changed ever so slightly.
Also take into consideration the existing tissue is likely to be highly diseased. The chronic intracellular bacteria will simply and quite happily infect these new stem cells.
This is highly speculatory but all the things we may well do in the lab to prepare good stem cells the body may be capable of doing itself under the right conditions. For example cells may fuse with each other to repair cellular components, telemeres and nuclear DNA but will only do so if they are not going to give them a bad case of pathogenic intracelluar bacteria.
Edited by caston, 23 April 2009 - 03:31 PM.