I've been taking Aniracetam for about 7 weeks now, my second favorite racetam only beaten by Oxiracetam. 1350mg twice daily. It was the first racetam I tried (1500mg first dose) and I felt the effects come on in about 30 minutes and lasts about 3 and a half hours. I was kind of stunned that the effect was noticeable at all. My visual acuity, hearing, memory, and confidence all slightly improved. My concentration improved dramatically, I found it very easy to focus on things I normally struggled with. I wouldn't say it gave me motivation so much as I found that my daily routine just wasn't as taxing or unmanageable as it normally seems. Simple things, like getting the mail, doing dishes, laundry, taxes, things that might normally seem like a hassle just didn't really bother me to do. Even after the main period of effect, I did feel like there was a residual benefit for a day or two.
When I say slight improvement, I'd probably say 2-5% in most areas. I don't expect my results to be typical, and a 2% gain might not seem worth the price to some people. Considering that there aren't many options for making oneself smarter, I believe any increase in brain plasticity is extremely important. I also think there are long-term benefits that will probably far exceed the slight or mild short-term improvements. I liked someones analogy to steroids; I think the largest gains are to be found in pushing the boundaries of mental exercise, not in immediate improvement.
I wouldn't say it's a quick fix, but I do see it as a valuable part of any healthy supplemental routine. Keeping mental function consistently high I think is a healthy long-term wellness strategy. I wouldn't expect it to change a person's life, but it should probably be as high a priority as a supplement as Vitamin C, Fish Oil, etc.
The article in Wired magazine that reviewed "Get Smart" really mirrors my opinion of Aniracetam. I think the author of the article actually took legitimate nootropics accidentally when comparing a bunch of herbal supplements that claim to add energy or improve focus. I don't think she was a priori aware that things like Aniracetam, Centrophenoxine, Pyritinol, and Huperzine A had been studied to measurably improve cognitive function whereas the other supplements being compared were just a collection of herbal ingredients (ginkgo, ginseng, red yeast, etc.) which aren't well reported to improve the same functions.
Note: I'm not saying herbal supplements have no value, I do take Ginkgo myself, I just think their value as nootropics is marginal at best when compared to the more chemical/drug nootropics like racetams, choline sources, AChEIs, and the like.
Edited by nezxon, 08 June 2011 - 04:37 PM.