

Never Be Sick Again
#61
Posted 15 December 2011 - 03:58 PM

#62
Posted 15 December 2011 - 08:43 PM
Normally, soaking is good to destroy lectins and phytates (beans, chickpeas etc.).It's the phytate problem of nuts (content): hazelnuts 1.9%%, Brazil nut 2.0-6.3%,
walnut 0.7-2.4%, almond 1.4-3.2% ...
"Phytate forms complexes with cations in the following descending order of strength:
Cu²+ > Zn²+ > Co²+ > Mn²+ > Fe3+ > Ca2+
(according to Reddy and Sathe et al., 2001)
You see that nuts destroy not only zinc and calcium but other minerals as well.
With nuts you have also the lectin problem, a really ugly thing
What about if you soak them to make them more digestible? Does that help any of that S > O > L stuff?
With nuts I don't know. Maybe it is difficult for water to penetrate a nut. I don't know.
#63
Posted 15 December 2011 - 08:53 PM
The most perfect food in terms of health (in sequence) is: 1) fruits, 2) salads, 3) veggies, 4) fish, 5) beans.
The most miserable food is: 1) pork drippings , 2) liver sausage, 3) pork, 4) cow milk products,
5) other meat, 6) wheat products, 7) seeds, 8) nuts.
I'm trying to comment without being a smart ass... uh, nevermind.
#64
Posted 16 December 2011 - 03:59 PM

#65
Posted 16 December 2011 - 05:08 PM
seeds and nuts miserable?
Everywhere you look there's a nut!

#66
Posted 16 December 2011 - 08:50 PM
I'm sorry, yes. But not very much miserable. If you eatseeds and nuts miserable?
five walnuts or ten cashews a day that's OK.
Seeds are not to be recommended. They contain a lot of
lectins and phytates. With these substances the plant is
protecting its reproduction. Man and animals are enemies
of the plant. During thousands of years a lot of plants
developed these substances as a defense.
#67
Posted 02 February 2012 - 11:37 AM
#68
Posted 02 February 2012 - 11:46 AM

#69
Posted 02 February 2012 - 05:16 PM
Fuck these paleo theories, regular consumption of nuts is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular and other diseases. I haven't yet see any experimental or epidemiological research that said nuts are bad for you.
I don't think that's a paleo theory. Nuts and seeds have been around forever, and we've no doubt been eating them forever. It's just another one of Werner's mechanism based hypotheses that doesn't have epidemiological support. The data says regular eating of a modest amount of nuts is good for you. If someone were to eat a crazy dose of seeds and nuts, then all bets are off, but that's true of everything.
#70
Posted 02 February 2012 - 06:14 PM
#71
Posted 03 February 2012 - 03:13 AM
Werner is the guy who wrote the post you were disagreeing with. It's a "mechanism-based" hypothesis. That means that he's hypothesizing that seeds and nuts are bad for you based on the fact that they contain some lectins and/or phytate. Both of those are hypothetically bad, if you consider them outside of their total nutritional context. The facts on the ground are the people who eat nuts living longer than people who don't eat nuts.what's werner's mechanism?
#72
Posted 09 June 2022 - 10:01 AM
. Cyanocobalamin actually breaks down as cyanide in your blood, for instance.
Never again. I was taking cyano b12 ( little as 1mg) and it was allocating and building up in my brain causing severe problems for days. and I am taking 1000mg of vitamin C and even that isn't alone enough to combat the cyonide. cant believe this stuff is used in food production (including waters) and materials that absorb in skin even if unhealthy. Cyandie made my brain bulge and motor function decrease attacking immune system. Is there an chemical free or less bad ones diet? my brain function affected.
Edited by kurdishfella, 09 June 2022 - 10:21 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users