Link: There is nothing wrong with posting something as a reference to a point you are making, but this is not the same thing as simply pasting a video or link as your entire post. You should be able to explain why something that you have posted is relevant to the discussion.
I agree with this and would argue most of my posts reference a point I am making. Debates are a different thing where two sides are fairly being presented such as you will find in my posts in the
atheist / theist debates in England. Here one could accuse me of posting atheist positions as well as theist positions
Simply posting links and videos of others opinions, demonstrates that you lack the ability to discuss and articulate your own understanding of ideas.
I don’t think so at all, depends on what it is. How does ir demonstrate that someone lacks the ability to articulate ones own understanding. I disagree with this jump to conclusion. Perhaps you have an example of this to back up your own conclusions.
Accusing others of "being afraid of audio visual sources" because you are too lazy to actually write anything in your own words is quite frankly, juvenile. Tell me, when you were doing your 12 years of college would it have been acceptable to hand in an essay comprised entirely of work cut and pasted from other sources, with no explaination or conclusion?
“Lazy,” “juvenile,“ ad hominem without any evidence. This is not a place where we are turning in papers. Of course this is fairly informal. I doubt you are not recognizing what this is. I wouldn’t turn in anything raw as it is presented here, would you? You are reminding me of a professor I once had. Everything I turned in to him had to be done with Campbell’s Form which is very formal format. I labored for three weeks on a paper. I usually got great grades but this paper cane back an “F.”
Big red marks showed my margins were one letter to wide and every time I went outside the line I lost a point. I made up my mind the next paper would be a nonsense paper that had no content but was correct form. I got an, “A.”
What I don’t hear is very many dealing with the substance but a lot of crying over the form. You are not doing this are you? Explain why you are so uptight with everything but the content.
There is nothing wrong with posting something as a reference to a point you are making, but this is not the same thing as simply pasting a video or link as your entire post. You should be able to explain why something that you have posted is relevant to the discussion.
I agree with this and would argue most of my posts reference a point I am making. Debates are a different thing where two sides are fairly being presented such as you will find in my posts in the
atheist / theist debates in England. Here one could accuse me of posting atheist positions as well as theist positions
Simply posting links and videos of others opinions, demonstrates that you lack the ability to discuss and articulate your own understanding of ideas.
I don’t think so at all, depends on what it is. How does ir demonstrate that someone lacks the ability to articulate ones own understanding. I disagree with this jump to conclusion. Perhaps you have an example of this to back up your own conclusions.
Accusing others of "being afraid of audio visual sources" because you are too lazy to actually write anything in your own words is quite frankly, juvenile. Tell me, when you were doing your 12 years of college would it have been acceptable to hand in an essay comprised entirely of work cut and pasted from other sources, with no explaination or conclusion?
“Lazy,” “juvenile,“ ad hominem without any evidence. This is not a place where we are turning in papers. Of course this is fairly informal. I doubt you are not recognizing what this is. I wouldn’t turn in anything raw as it is presented here, would you? You are reminding me of a professor I once had. Everything I turned in to him had to be done with Campbell’s Form which is very formal format. I labored for three weeks on a paper. I usually got great grades but this paper cane back an “F.”
Big red marks showed my margins were one letter to wide and every time I went outside the line I lost a point. I made up my mind the next paper would be a nonsense paper that had no content but was correct form. I got an, “A.”
What I don’t hear is very many dealing with the substance but a lot of crying over the form. You are not doing this are you? Explain why you are so uptight with everything but the content.