• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

DNA Repair Defects In Stem Cell Function And Aging


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 olaf.larsson

  • Guest
  • 583 posts
  • 21
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 04 March 2005 - 12:57 PM


A text which is very interesting and of fundamental importance...

Park Y, Gerson SL.
DNA REPAIR DEFECTS IN STEM CELL FUNCTION AND AGING *
Annu Rev Med. 2005 Feb 18;56:495-508.

http://www.ncbi.nlm....t_uids=15660524

I hope you can read it.

Edited by wolfram, 05 March 2005 - 05:55 AM.


#2

  • Lurker
  • 1

Posted 04 March 2005 - 01:42 PM

I view this as another blow for the theory that nuclear DNA damage only results in cancer...

Wolfram, your thoughts...?

Edited by Bates, 23 July 2005 - 06:48 PM.


#3 olaf.larsson

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 583 posts
  • 21
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 05 March 2005 - 06:07 AM

Its very interesting to read that stem cells have been found to be able to maintain genome integrity 400 times better than normal differentiated cells. If stem cell mutations are central for aging it should be possible to fill people up with new stem cells from frozen stem cell banks. It could be possible to to some extent treat premature aging symptoms by genetic engeneering of the patients stem cells. The thing I wonder is: If you take the most undiferentiated stem cells and inject in the bloodstreem, will they then infiltrate all diffrent tissues, differentiate and contribute to the stem cell populations there? One thing i thought about is that it would be some kind of strange if you used some other persons stem cells even if this person is totaly HLA compatible. I guess that after 100 years of filling up with an other persons stemcells you would partially have become this person. I dont know much about stem cells yet but I hope to learn more.

Edited by wolfram, 05 March 2005 - 07:23 AM.


#4 John Schloendorn

  • Guest, Advisor, Guardian
  • 2,542 posts
  • 157
  • Location:Mountain View, CA

Posted 05 March 2005 - 07:57 AM

Wolfram, you would not take the most undifferentiated (ES) cells because they tend to give rise to nasty tumors called teratomas. The best bet for infiltrating other tissues are currently hematopoietic stem cells. Aside, they can also be used to engineer immune tolerance against - well, anything.
But in addition I would advocate reseeding the stem cells in every suitable organ much in the same way as in the hematopoietic system by organ-specific precursors to achieve the most efficient therapy. As for the hematopoietic system, I found this a good place to start:

Edited by Bates, 23 July 2005 - 06:47 PM.


#5 John Schloendorn

  • Guest, Advisor, Guardian
  • 2,542 posts
  • 157
  • Location:Mountain View, CA

Posted 05 March 2005 - 08:01 AM

I can't see how you could become another person by using someone else's stem cells. I would define my personality from the information encoded in my central nervous system, such as neuronal wiring, no matter what genes are in my cells. Some people here advocate replacing our bodies with machines altogether, so what would become of their persons then? Any therapy worth taking should not strongly affect neuronal wiring, of course.

#6 olaf.larsson

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 583 posts
  • 21
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 06 March 2005 - 02:09 PM

I can't see how you could become another person by using someone else's stem cells.

No I dont mean that you will get another personality unless you use the stemcells to replace nerv-cells. Does this "engeneered immunotolerance" you are talking about has as consequence that all autoimmune diseases will be cured? By the way how do you do those nice little download squares?

#7

  • Lurker
  • 1

Posted 07 March 2005 - 06:43 AM

I would agree with John and say that personality is far less contained in the genome of each neuron (or potential neuron if we are talking about stem cells) and far more in the network configuration of axons, dendrites and synapses. Of course one has to account for the transcriptional profile that emerges from the genome and modulates the network by means neurotransmitters and receptors.

Wolfram has raised an interesting question - how differently would stem cells from a female, for example, behave when inserted into the brain of a patient? Methylation studies suggest that age could be imprinted on the genome (until otherwise reprogrammed) so it is likely that stem cells from a younger person would behave differently than stem cells from an older person. Certainly food for thought when considering stem cell based regenerative therapies, as well as material for potential research.

(PS those download squares are file attachments which you can access to from the bottom left hand side of the Add Reply screen)

#8 Dey

  • Guest
  • 3 posts
  • 0

Posted 16 April 2005 - 10:18 PM

Hi,

I just want to add, that mesenchymal stem cells are a much better source (in the moment) to be injected in the blood stream, as there are less troubles with immuno-tolerance. Has been done many times and only few cases are known where these cells have lead to an unwanted growth (in mice, they found unwanted growth in the lung after injection mesenchymal stem cells). Mesenchymal stem cells are also able to invade tissue, even the brain.
It seems that stem cells, at least in vivo, protect there DNA by dividing asymmetrically and thereby avoiding transcription induced mutations (Read Sherley JD, )


Greetings,

Mondey




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users