• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Resveratrol, antioxidants cause DNA damage

resveratrol genotoxic antioxidants dna damage

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 nowayout

  • Guest
  • 2,946 posts
  • 439
  • Location:Earth

Posted 09 July 2012 - 05:48 PM


http://www.ncbi.nlm....les/PMC3325711/

High-throughput genotoxicity assay identifies antioxidants as inducers of DNA damage response and cell death


Human ATAD5 is a biomarker for identifying genotoxic compounds because ATAD5 protein levels increase posttranscriptionally in response to DNA damage. We screened over 4,000 compounds with a cell-based quantitative high-throughput ATAD5-luciferase assay detecting genotoxic compounds. We identified 22 antioxidants, including resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein, that are currently used or investigated for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, osteopenia, osteoporosis, and chronic hepatitis, as well as for antiaging. Treatment of dividing cells with these compounds induced DNA damage and resulted in cell death. Despite their genotoxic effects, resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein did not cause mutagenesis, which is a major side effect of conventional anticancer drugs. Furthermore, resveratrol and genistein killed multidrug-resistant cancer cells. We therefore propose that resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein are attractive candidates for improved chemotherapeutic agents.


For example, resveratrol induces breaks in DNA:

First, these compounds were tested for their ability to induce breaks in DNA. Treatment with all compounds increased the fraction of cells having more than 10 chromatid breaks (Fig. 2B and Fig. S5A). Treatment with genistein and resveratrol resulted in a significant induction of a DSB marker, ...


and

N-phenyl-2-napthylamine, daidzein, resveratrol, 2-aminoanthraquinone, and baicalein most likely produce DNA lesions that stall the progression of the replication fork at different levels. This process, in turn, affected the increase in the number of Polη nuclear foci in a similar manner. Even though some previous reports have suggested that polyphenols/antioxidants could produce DNA damage by acting as pro-oxidants, intercalating into DNA, inhibiting topoisomerase, and inhibiting DNA polymerase (Table S3, column 4) (9, 10), the severity of the genotoxicities induced by resveratrol, baicalein, and genistein was surprising. The level of DNA damage caused by a 16-h treatment with 92 μM resveratrol, baicalein, or genistein was comparable to that caused by treatment with the well-known genotoxins MMS and cisplatin


and

We verified that several of these compounds, including resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein, are indeed potent DNA damaging agents at concentrations of 92 μM. Although Western blot analysis did not detect DNA damage responses to concentrations of resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein that could be obtained from oral dosing (2–5 μM) (Fig. S7A) (22, 23), the ATAD5-luc assay identified these compounds as genotoxins at concentrations as low as 2 μM (Fig. S7B). These findings were surprising given that resveratrol and genistein are currently being tested in clinical studies as treatments for cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, osteopenia, and osteoporosis (24, 25); resveratrol has gained notoriety for its potential antiaging effects; and baicalein is the major constituent of a Japanese herbal remedy for chronic hepatitis (26). The genotoxicity caused by these compounds raises concerns regarding their use for such conditions and suggests a reevaluation of their safety.


Another writeup.

http://www.genome.gov/27547858

Edited by viveutvivas, 09 July 2012 - 05:51 PM.


#2 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 09 July 2012 - 05:53 PM

Yeah, right. In a 96 well plate, at some impossible-to-achieve-in-vivo concentration. That's the usual MO of papers like this.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 nowayout

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,946 posts
  • 439
  • Location:Earth

Posted 09 July 2012 - 07:26 PM

Yeah, right. In a 96 well plate, at some impossible-to-achieve-in-vivo concentration. That's the usual MO of papers like this.


I don't think we know either way, but FWIW your answer reminds me of those who tell us that pesticides and other environmental pollutants are harmless because their concentrations are low, not taking into account time-integrated exposure, synergistic effects of various substances, effects on certain tissues in which the substances get concentrated, etc.

Is there any reason to think that DNA damage would be a step function of the concentration, as opposed to, say, a linear function, or that there is a threshold of DNA damage below which the damage doesn't matter?

At least this result should argue for caution.
  • like x 1

#4 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 09 July 2012 - 08:34 PM

Well, I looked at the paper, and sure enough, it was cells being treated at 100-250 uM. That is extremely far removed from anything we can achieve in vivo. A lot of biological responses are step functions, though I don't know if this would be or not. I know that resveratrol has quite different effects at high doses than it does at low doses. If I saw a negative effect of any of these compounds in a mammal, I would pay attention. A high throughput assay at crazy-high concentrations isn't significant enough to make me change my supplementation behavior.

#5 chipdouglas

  • Guest
  • 218 posts
  • 3

Posted 17 July 2012 - 01:00 PM

Niner : how many mg resveratrol do you have daily ? Just being curious here.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#6 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:02 PM

Niner : how many mg resveratrol do you have daily ? Just being curious here.


At the moment, it's only 15mg/day. This comes as what I suspect is just window dressing in a Grape Seed Extract that I use. However, someone posted a paper here a while back suggesting that such low doses are still useful.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: resveratrol, genotoxic, antioxidants, dna damage

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users