LONGECITY

Start sending the amount not as gifts so nothing gets frozen.

Q did it!, how far are we from the amount needed, percentwise?

OK I got it Verified!

OK found what i need to fix (see below). If this is necessary i can call my bank tomorrow for the information seeing that I do not have checks on hand. But yes I do have my Debit card, visa, linked to the account. I am not out to scam anyone here. I am just collecting and wiring the funds. If you recall I was all pro (not to mention my suggestion) to have Longecity to handle this if possible. But seeing that that was not possible the job fell to me. So i will call my bank tomorrow for the necessary information.

I'm sorry I wasn't trying to suggest you were a scammer.

It is just that Unverified Accounts can wrongfully get FROZEN under Fraud Protection when lots of people start depositing large sums (see here PayPal has serious problems). Otherwise, usually your bank or credit card swoops in to save the day - its happened to me!

Just to be clear, I will be making payment soon.

OK.. here's the problem.

An account receiving 25 uniform $80 "gifts" in a short-span of time from different accounts located all over the world is guaranteed to set off a red flag for unusual activity.

Honestly, I am not too worried that Q will scam us (he seems like a nice boy from Missouri), I am MUCH more concerned that PayPal will freeze the account and screw us.

My account has been PayPal Verified since June 2003 and I still encounter problems from time to time so I can only imagine what might happen to Q's new, unverified account

I am not really a boy from Missouri (hate “misery”). I am from Arizona and moved here to be closer to family but will probably move west when I finish college. But yes I did not mean to let you think I was offended I had been awake for almost 24 hours (been very busy these last few days). Hope this all works out and the chemical actually works.

Start sending the amount not as gifts so nothing gets frozen.

Yes this should help with possible red flags. And I do plan to do the transfer through my bank so I can dispute the payment if we get screwed.

Q did it!, how far are we from the amount needed, percentwise?

We have had six deposit for a total of $480.00

I am not really a boy from Missouri (hate “misery”). I am from Arizona and moved here to be closer to family but will probably move west when I finish college. But yes I did not mean to let you think I was offended I had been awake for almost 24 hours (been very busy these last few days). Hope this all works out and the chemical actually works.

Misery State I reckon?

Anyway, great progress... keep us posted if PayPal gives you any problems

If somebody (especially from Bay Area) wants to split my 4g, you can PM me. It is a large dose....

I'm in....paypal sent.

Shoot -- I can't believed I missed out on this. Anyone want to split their dose with me? LOL

Sure, I'll be glad to. 800 doses are far more than enough for a trial run. Once we get the magic powder, I'll send you a PM, and we'll go from there. Please be free to remind me if i forget

Thanks for your offer -- I really appreciate it. I imagine this thread will continue on for a while, so I'll post here again when people start receiving their PLR-8-53.

I can split my 4gs with someone.

Wait a minute, so am I still included in the list of participants?

Wait a minute, so am I still included in the list of participants?

Did you get a PM from Q did it! (?)

I haven't talked with Q did it!; but, from what I gather on Sunday we will be adding new longecity users to the list. That is those who did not respond to Q did it! PM or did not post in the forum showing any interest will be crossed out.

Unfortunately no :-(. I've been away for the weekend, so I have evidently missed my opportunity! Aw well.

Unfortunately no :-(. I've been away for the weekend, so I have evidently missed my opportunity! Aw well.

No you are in. I just cant pm you tell midnight.

How far along are we on the funds for PRL-8-53?

For those of you have not yet sent your share of the funds please add a note along with our share that includes address and user name as well as replying by pm with the same information. This will make things a lot easier.

Actually, now that I think about it, I think I would prefer to split the dose and price with someone -- 400 doses would still be more than enough "smart drug" to carry me through the rest of my academic career, LOL. Several individuals here have kindly offered to split their doses with me, so I will be in touch with everyone in this thread as everything progresses.

So do we send the money through paypal as under for family and friends and take the extra cost?

So do we send the money through paypal as under for family and friends and take the extra cost?

Which ever one you want to pick. It is just with the family you do not get charged a fee.

We have nine persons who have paid there shares. I do not want to make it know who has and who has not but if you want to make it know you can.

I see you already find a supplier but if it turns out to be china scammer, try to use jera-lab they are EU based and provide many "grey-market" products, they also do custom synthesis, 99% legit.

I see you already find a supplier but if it turns out to be china scammer, try to use jera-lab they are EU based and provide many "grey-market" products, they also do custom synthesis, 99% legit.

Why do you think they are a scammer? I did some research and they seem okay but I guess I should do full due diligence on them.

BTW, Jera-Lab looks suspicious as fuck.
Edited by peakplasma, 31 March 2013 - 02:13 PM.

No way that Jera-Lab can synthesize something like PLR 8-53

I see you already find a supplier but if it turns out to be china scammer, try to use jera-lab they are EU based and provide many "grey-market" products, they also do custom synthesis, 99% legit.

Thank you! I'll be sure to reach them at jera-lab@gmail.com and make a $1600 order based on your comprehensive review.

I really hope this is not a dud and we all survive.

Hey so everyone happy about this? I mean a working memory with 21 digits... cmmon too good to be true, or not :D

Hey so everyone happy about this? I mean a working memory with 21 digits... cmmon too good to be true, or not :D

Thought we discovered that wasn't true at the start of the thread.

don't know if this was posted already, but here's one study on it that showed up to 150% in retention. what do you guys make of the note on the last page though?

Hey so everyone happy about this? I mean a working memory with 21 digits... cmmon too good to be true, or not :D

If true, wasn't that PLR 8-147? I thought you were going to order PRL-8-53 (which rather seems to focus on long term rather than short term).

Hey so everyone happy about this? I mean a working memory with 21 digits... cmmon too good to be true, or not :D

Thought we discovered that wasn't true at the start of the thread.

I haven't seen that claim dis-proven although the proof seems rather insufficient.

don't know if this was posted already, but here's one study on it that showed up to 150% in retention. what do you guys make of the note on the last page though?

Yeah the last quote look good:

Subjects over 30 years of age responded very well
as a group. Acquisition is improved by a full 31 ~.
Retention scores show a 108-152~ improvement
after drug. It would seem that our intellectual faculties,
as they begin to deteriorate with age, are still
amenable to at least a partial restoration through drug
action.
Two other areas of human performance were
investigated. Visual reaction time showed a very minor
improvement following drug, but it was not statistically
significance. Motor control was slightly superior
in the drug group, but this effect is also of no statistical
significance. This finding seems important because
of the absence of a negative response, the type of
adverse effect that might be expected for a phenethylamine-
related compound.
Side Effects. Inquiry was made of all subjects regarding
potential side effects. Not a single instance of an
adverse reaction was reported.
DISCUSSION
The title compound, PRL-8-53, has been reported
previously to improve acquisition and retention in the
experimental animal (Hansl, 1974a, 1975). These
positive effects on conditioned avoidance responses
in rats lend support to the original hypothesis that
links certain pharmacological activities to enhancement
of intellectual functions. The present clinical
study lends further credence to the concepts of optimal
balance of conductive systems in the CNS, and to the
projection that the existing balance in a given individual
can be successfully modulated. The fact that
a large proportion of the population responded
favorably to drug treatment may indicate that for the
majority of people a similar pattern of imbalance
develops. This correlation might be even more pronounced
for people advancing with age, if the test
results of this study with the population subgroup
over 30 years of age can be taken as an indicator.

don't know if this was posted already, but here's one study on it that showed up to 150% in retention. what do you guys make of the note on the last page though?

Not sure, we're focusing on PRL-8-53. PRL-8-147 hasn't been tested on humans yet.

Not sure, we're focusing on PRL-8-53. PRL-8-147 hasn't been tested on humans yet.

I am not sure what the reference to PRL 147 has to do with it, redan. I know we're talking re 53 and the study was re 53. The note i was referring to was at the bottom of the last page of the full text and reads:

"NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
Following completion of this study it was found that the particular
lot of PRL-8-53 that had been used contained a small amount of
the desmethyl compound as admixture, which may also have contributed
to the observed effects. However, since this compound is
considered a metabolite of the parent compound (8-53), its
presence should not detract from the findings."

what does this mean?