• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

Astragaloside 4 or Cycloastragenol

astragaloside cycloastragenol vimmortal 2.0

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
8 replies to this topic

Poll: Cycloastragenol or Astragaoside 4 (17 member(s) have cast votes)

Cycloastragenol or Astragaoside 4?

  1. Yes (9 votes [52.94%])

    Percentage of vote: 52.94%

  2. No (8 votes [47.06%])

    Percentage of vote: 47.06%

Vote

#1 Mind

  • Life Member, Moderator, Secretary
  • 17,418 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 26 September 2012 - 12:50 AM


We are getting closer to finalizing the product and Revgenetics is again pledging to assist in manufacturing Vimmortal 2.0.

One ingredient(s) that Anthony suggested for inclusion in Vimmortal 2.0 is Cycloastragenol or Astragaoside 4.

This has never been voted on properly. Please vote and give a rationale.

#2 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 26 September 2012 - 02:11 AM

I voted no because these compounds don't fit the criteria that we set out for the project. There are some people who would be distinctly opposed to taking these, which I think would shrink the potential market.

#3 Picard

  • Guest
  • 41 posts
  • 15
  • Location:USA

Posted 04 November 2012 - 06:24 PM

I voted no because I suspect the price increase would be astronomical. If this is demonstrably false, I'm glad to retract it.

#4 Anthony_Loera

  • Life Member
  • 3,130 posts
  • 714
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 04 November 2012 - 06:58 PM


Actually the idea of making almost nothing on the cyclo, to boost sales was the objective.

However there is a contract item that i am not real happy about, so Vimmortal is not a priority.

Cheers
A



#5 Picard

  • Guest
  • 41 posts
  • 15
  • Location:USA

Posted 04 November 2012 - 07:10 PM

Sorry about the mistaken assumption. I can see how adding it would increase the appeal for some, but whether that's enough to mitigate any potential losses from its inclusion is a different matter. I'd guess the addition would substantially increase sales on whole.

It's disappointing to hear about a disagreement on the contract. I've been aching for a decent multivitamin and hoped to have my hands on Vimmortal 2.0 by the end of the year. Can I ask if the contract dispute is related to ImmInst's non-profit status again?

#6 Anthony_Loera

  • Life Member
  • 3,130 posts
  • 714
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 04 November 2012 - 08:11 PM

No, i think their non-profit status is fine.

A



#7 exigentsky

  • Guest
  • 262 posts
  • -2

Posted 20 November 2012 - 10:42 AM

I support this addition since the goal of taking a supplement is to extend healthy life and recent studies are suggesting that telomerase activity is important in the aging mechanism.

#8 Logic

  • Guest
  • 2,655 posts
  • 581
  • Location:Kimberley, South Africa
  • NO

Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:17 PM

As Jim Green's results were best with Solgar's Astragalus root and extract mixture; why go this route?

#9 hallucinogen

  • Guest
  • 359 posts
  • -47
  • Location:Atlantic Ocean

Posted 18 January 2013 - 08:38 PM

What is the current approximate date of Vimmortal 2.0 release ?





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: astragaloside, cycloastragenol, vimmortal 2.0

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users