• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

Brain-Limb Prothesis


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 ocsrazor

  • Guest OcsRazor
  • 461 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 10 May 2005 - 11:58 PM


Miguel Nicolelis continues his streak of cutting edge papers in neuroprosthetics. He finds that the monkey motor cortex rewires to reflect the presence of the robotic arm it has control of in his experiments. This is not suprising considering other people have shown previously that the motor cortex re-maps to reflect any tool that is used frequently, but it does very much strengthen the argument that the primate neocortex is for all intensive purposes "plug and play".

The news story follows:

Monkey brain rewires to use robotic arm

By STEVE MITCHELL
WASHINGTON, May 10 (UPI) -- The brains of monkeys who learned to control robotic arms rewired themselves to treat the arms as if they were real -- a finding scientists say has implications for developing limbs to assist handicapped humans.

The findings build upon a 2003 study that found monkeys were able to control robotic arms using only signals from their brains and without moving their own arms.

Miguel Nicolelis and colleagues at Duke University's Center for Neuroengineering analyzed the data to see what was happening to the primates' brain cells as they learned to use the robotic arm to position a cursor on a video screen.

"The monkey's brain incorporates properties of the robotic arm as if it was another arm and changes to adapt to those properties," Nicolelis, a neurobiologist, told United Press International. "Basically, the brain extends the representation of the animal's body and enhances the sense of self. The animal can function using two arms but also can function as if he has a third arm."

This not only expands the limit of the brain's ability to adapt itself to new situations, it also "opens new venues for how to design prosthetics that can be more readily incorporated by the brain," he said.

Such prosthetics, dubbed "neuroprosthetics" by Nicolelis, could give those needing artificial limbs the ability to control them as if they were the real thing.

Experiments in Nicolelis' lab already are building on the neuroprosthetic concept. His team is developing ways patients can receive feedback sensation, either visually or by touch, from neuroprosthetic devices via electrodes running from the limb to the brain. This would make the appendages function more like real limbs by providing a perceptual image in the patients' minds, he said.

Although neuroprosthetics probably are five years away at least, Nicolelis said, "It's becoming rapidly a new area of clinical research."

He also noted studies conducted last year in his own lab have shown this principle can work.

Research in other labs also has advanced this concept. In February, a team from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine reported a monkey fitted with a robotic arm controlled by only its brain signals was able to feed itself using the arm. Tiny electrodes implanted in the brain translated the brain signals into movement of the robotic arm.

In Nicolelis' study, which appears in the May 11 issue of the Journal of Neuroscience, the monkey's brain was able to adapt to the robotic arm by shifting some of its neurons that previously were used to control its own arms to become more attuned to the function of the robotic arm.

When the researchers analyzed the brain signals collected during the experiment, they found the monkey simultaneously carrying out an activity with its own arm while performing another with the robotic arm.

Jack Uellendahl, a clinical specialist in prosthetics at Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics in Phoenix, Ariz., called the findings "fascinating" but believes the application to artificial limbs is a long way off.

The greater potential might be for quadriplegics rather than for amputees, said Uellendahl, who has more than 25 years of experience in the prosthetics field.

Recent advances in enabling amputees to control prostheses using their residual muscles already have allowed patients to exceed the dexterity of current artificial limbs and devices, such as hands, wrists, elbows and shoulders, he said. Rather than developing better ways to control prostheses, there might be a greater need to develop better prosthetic joints, he added.

Developing better control methods based on findings from the monkey research may have a spillover benefit.

"Perhaps this method of controlling the full variety of prosthetic joints possible will encourage more development of more sophisticated prosthetic joints," Uellendahl said.

The findings challenge some experts' views of the brain's plasticity, Nicolelis said. Although it has long been accepted the human brain is uniquely adaptable to functioning in novel situations and learning to use new tools, Nicolelis and his colleagues believe their results push the boundaries of that concept.

They propose the human brain has the unique ability to change its concept of self and this extends to the tools humans use. This is not too surprising since the brain routinely incorporates tools in everyday use into its perception of who people are.

"Everything from cars to clothing that we use in our lives becomes incorporated into our sense of self," Nicolelis said. "So, our species is capable of 'evolving' the perception of what we are."

Steve Mitchell is UPI's medical correspondent. E-mail sciencedesk@upi.com.

#2 kevin

  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 11 May 2005 - 12:35 AM

Although neuroprosthetics probably are five years away at least, Nicolelis said


[:o] Five Years?!.. that's like tomorrow in terms of application!

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#3 ocsrazor

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest OcsRazor
  • 461 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 11 May 2005 - 01:02 AM

Things are beginning to pick up speed Kevin - Neuorengineering is beginning to find its feet (and arms :) ) as a field.

The dark side of this is that DARPA is throwing a ton of money at prosthetics right now - for two horribly obvious reasons - wounded vets and neurally controlled weapon systems. Nicolelis is a DARPA funded group btw. I struggle with the ethics of this frequently - I'm extremely excited by the possibilities and funding for research, but at the same time repelled by the possible abuses.

#4 Lazarus Long

  • Life Member, Guardian
  • 8,116 posts
  • 242
  • Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York

Posted 11 May 2005 - 01:47 PM

Here is a link to Science Daily that recapitulates the article you provide Peter.

Monkey brain rewires to use robotic arm By STEVE MITCHELL

Would it be possible for someone to upload the study from the Journal of Neuroscience?

In Nicolelis' study, which appears in the May 11 issue of the Journal of Neuroscience,



#5 ocsrazor

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest OcsRazor
  • 461 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 11 May 2005 - 06:29 PM

Unfortunately as far as I am aware it is illegal for us to upload journal articles Laz :( Anyone know for sure on this? I have a pdf copy already

#6 Lazarus Long

  • Life Member, Guardian
  • 8,116 posts
  • 242
  • Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York

Posted 11 May 2005 - 06:59 PM

Go take a look at the Science Corner.

This is educational material being used for educational purposes and falls into fair use category IMHO but the decision is yours Peter. We have been sharing a lot of this kind of information for genetics and biological research already.

#7 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 13 July 2006 - 05:22 AM

Brains can now control prosthetics, with the assistance of computers:

http://www.physorg.c...ws71942020.html

http://www.nature.co...l/060710-8.html

What does this mean in the long term? Rugged artificial body-shells that can house our brains and be controlled by them? Then maybe we wouldn't have to worry as much about aging.

#8 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 17 October 2007 - 04:02 AM

If you watch the video, you'll see it's quite agile:

http://www.engadget....tic-arm-demoed/

Seems to be capable of a full range of motion comparable to a natural arm, and at the same speed.

Gee, would this mean the end of manual labor as well?
Robotics can keep improving, unlike our natural limbs which are what they are.
An amputee could keep upgrading, as the technology gets better.

#9 Ghostrider

  • Guest
  • 1,996 posts
  • 56
  • Location:USA

Posted 17 October 2007 - 04:25 AM

...software is the limitation, not the hardware. Same issue with the automated driver project, also run by Darpa, the cars drive just fine, just not so well when the driver is a computer.

#10 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 17 October 2007 - 05:05 AM

Well, I'm imagining that prosthetics will increasingly be directly controlled by our own brain, with minimal software re-interpretation.

Right now, servo-motors are being used, but eventually these could be replaced with electropolymer materials (even nanotubes?) that would more directly mimic the behavior of our own natural muscle actuators and sensors.

#11 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 17 October 2007 - 05:07 AM

Still some work to do on it it appears. It couldn't get the shaking correct when the guy first tried to shake its hand (although it got it on the second time when he "shook correctly" which would not be what most people did the first time) and it dropped the slick object because of not enough grip. I expect there are some more things that need to be worked out, but if they can get it done by 2009 (Darpa's goal) then that would be spectacular! So many soldiers (and just people in the general public) could benefit from this technology.

#12 mike250

  • Guest
  • 981 posts
  • 9

Posted 17 October 2007 - 05:21 AM

and maybe add to it a more ''cosmetic'' touch.

#13 Ghostrider

  • Guest
  • 1,996 posts
  • 56
  • Location:USA

Posted 17 October 2007 - 06:19 AM

Well, I'm imagining that prosthetics will increasingly be directly controlled by our own brain, with minimal software re-interpretation.


Yes, I think that will be the case, however, it will not be the end of manual labor. I don't really like the prosthetic idea, not bad, but not ideal. If I lost an arm, I would rather have a human arm transplanted back onto me. I wonder how far off this really is...

#14 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,082 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 14 October 2008 - 08:11 PM

New prosthetic arm has more natural movement.

The neuro-controlled bionic arm technology, developed at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, allows an amputee to move their prosthetic arm as if it were a real limb, allowing patients to use their prosthetic arm with more natural motion through thought-controlled movement. Rob Anderson, 31, from Grande Prairie and Larry Hayes-Richards, 62, from Edmonton are the first two patients in Canada to undergo this procedure.

"This world-class surgery and prosthetic technology opens a whole new world of possibilities to patients," said Jackie Hebert, clinical director of the Adult Amputee program at the Glenrose and professor in the U of A Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry. "The ultimate goal for any prosthetic is to enhance outcome from limb loss; to bridge the wide gap between the actual loss of function and prosthetic replacement. The bionic arm is the future of prosthetics, and it's here today."

To provide the thought-controlled movement, nerves located in the amputee's shoulder, once terminated in the amputated arm, are re-routed and connected to healthy muscle in the chest and surrounding muscles through a surgical process called targeted muscle reinnervation.

This procedure allows the re-routed nerves to grow into the appropriate muscle and direct the signals they once sent to the amputated arm instead to the prosthetic arm. When the patient thinks about moving his or her arm, the action is carried out as voluntarily as it would be in a healthy arm, allowing for smoother, more controlled movement of the prosthetic device.



sponsored ad

  • Advert

#15 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,082 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 09 January 2009 - 12:39 AM

We have the technology to rebuild ourselves.

Great 3 page article from newscientist about all the rapid advances in prosthesis.

Emerging prosthetic technologies promise not only greater power and flexibility but also pressure-sensitive artificial skin, and even limbs that are bonded to the body and controlled by the mind - and much of this within five years. Rebuilding amputees to be faster and stronger than before is rapidly becoming a realistic possibility. With experimental prosthetics increasingly able to integrate with flesh, bone and the nervous system, the very idea of "losing a limb" may one day become obsolete.


So refreshing to read the following quote:

Far-fetched as it may seem now, what if cosmetic surgery was to one day extend to replacing perfectly good arms and legs with more beautiful or powerful ones in the hope of producing another Michael Phelps or Victoria's Secret model? "Then we will have to evolve as a society a new morality, new ethics and codes of conduct, won't we?" says Gow.


For years all we have heard is how enhancement is bad - natural is good. Perhaps the tide is turning.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users