14 replies to this topic

[ADVANCESSSS]

I'v figured out that if you stay looking at something with your eyes and then try and focus on something in the side sight, even very at the side, you can, without pointing your eyes at it~

 

My guess then is that the certain signals going to the consciousness section go in and your conscious of it, and can then control which signals you want to multiply more to focus on-be conscious of more, right?

[platypus]

I believe that is called attention. 

[ADVANCESSSS]

???...

 

This explains though that you can, pick which signals and have them multiplied and or come in more and be conscious of those ones therefore more, right?

Edited by ADVANCE, 27 June 2014 - 04:58 PM.

[Tom_]

You can't. Eye physiology doesn't allow for that. In part because of the blind spot (http://en.wikipedia....d_spot_(vision) has a test to show you it, its pretty cool). Then there is the fact there are less colour cones and to a less extent less 'picture' cones in the futher reaches of the eye and as such we can only focus on what we look at.

[ADVANCESSSS]

But I can do what I said, I can face toward a wall and look directly at the letter y with my eyes pointing right at it...and then I can focus more on anything else one at a time like the clock to the right or oven to the left and then I don't really see really the vision going in the middle anymore and just the clock or oven~ I can do this anywhere around the vision circle and even at extreme sides of course~ III can, we can right? Try it, ya I'm sure then it's correct what I said we can do and how it works too...

[Tom_]

Your eyes are moving or I'm misunderstanding what you are saying.

[YOLF]

Nope, doesn't work for me... maybe I have tunnel vision?

[ADVANCESSSS]

No they arn't moving lol, I can look at my bed right now from the very side while my eyes are looking pointed out of face at console cables, then lets say at the very right my screen, and then as I actually turn my eyes to the left to point them at the bed it's such a turn to get them to it and the moving of them is definitely tell able and I know yes they arn't moving when I pick what to focus on, so what I said is right? Also you don't focus it as much as middle of vision going in the eye, but good enough to know you don't see anything but "this to left" or "above" and are conscious of it more and ya it's true~ So I'm right? about both it and how?

[YOLF]

Sometimes you have good grammar, and sometimes you have bad grammar that is virtually incomprehensible... You really need to make a habit of getting the grammar right every time. It gets easier the more you do it.

[Clacksberg]

Treble LOL, What have you been drinking Lad?

[ADVANCESSSS]

None, I don't drink or smoke or do drugs, and stop doing that to all my threads, stop it!...anyhow back to the topic, so everyone understand I and (should be everyone else) can look and travel all around with some good focus, without looking all around with your eyes, all agree? And that how it works as I explained above is right?

Edited by ADVANCE, 27 June 2014 - 09:27 PM.

[Clacksberg]

I can get the gist that you've got some really interesting philosophy arguments in your posts - but the english is not making it clear, for me..

Edited by cactus fast back, 27 June 2014 - 10:03 PM.

[ADVANCESSSS]

So everyone try it and agree we can look and travel all around with some good focus, without even moving your eyes, all agree? And that how it works as I explained above is right?

[scitris]

I think you mean attention. Physically your focus is pointing toward something with great detail, but mentally you can concentrate on something else that is in your span but where your eyes arnt looking at directly. The part that you are concentrating at is in peripheral vision, not in the middle. Do you mean this?

 

Or do you mean you can focus your vision on something with great detail thats not in the middle of your vision?

It isnt possible to do it in such a great detail like in the middle of the vision, but i think your brain can make it to an illusion.

Its not about seeing its about recognising. When do you concentrate on something at the peripheral vision you could think you would better see it, you would get an focus. But that isnt real its only because you are concentrating mentally on it and you begin recognising things that arnt well seen. Because of recognition you are now seeing things at this object, your brain now fills your "picture" with details,

because it knows that they are logically a part of it. It reconstructs your vision and fills the blind spots with known components that are logically a part of that object, the big picture. I could imagine it would give you the feeling of sharpness.

 

 

 

Normally its the other way around, but i think with the most things in reality its bidirectional.

 

 

Edited by scitris, 30 June 2014 - 11:57 AM.

[ADVANCESSSS]

Yes the further from the middle the less detail, and is being focused as something on the side how ever far you picked, and so can pick where to only focus on more and then middle gets abolished a lot and obviously everywhere else is not as seen as much either, and just the spot your choosing now because your focusing on this one spot only the most and see it only the most~ Also each quick moment image is each coming in all together, all thousands of signals into the consciousness at the same time, and that you can pick which ones to multiply to only focus them more, the signals then still stay on side, but you see that spot more and because why I said~ Also another way to understand it is music, you can choose which instrument to hear the most more, and is because more signals of it are going in and the only way to multiply those certain signals is to have them go in and be conscious of them andd thenn choose which signals to focus on and they get multiplied~ This has great value knowing this, such as thousands of signals go in at the same time, and can choose after first conscious of them which ones to then multiply to be more conscious of.

 

 

To my post right above, #15, so, ?

Edited by ADVANCE, 30 June 2014 - 10:42 PM.