• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Should Site Be Limited to Posts About Life Extension?

site

  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

Poll: Poll (28 member(s) have cast votes)

Should this site be limited to posts about Artificial Life Extension and Cryonics?

  1. No (22 votes [78.57%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 78.57%

  2. Yes (6 votes [21.43%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#31 Antonio2014

  • Guest
  • 634 posts
  • 52
  • Location:Spain
  • NO

Posted 24 October 2014 - 11:33 AM

Definitely yes! I'm tired of seeing all the "Introduce Yourself" posts talking about nootropics instead of immortalism. The header of this web says:

 

Longecity

Advocay & Research for unlimited Lifespans

 

Nootropics has nothing to do with that. Nor dietary supplements, calorie restriction, exercise, ... At most, they can give you negligible life extension. With them, you still will probably die at around 80 years old, and for sure at less than 120 years old. That's not "unlimited lifespan"!

 

 

I think that many fear that we would lose direction and just become a cash cow site for supplement advice.

 

I think we actually are a cash cow site for supplement advice with a life extension subforum.

 

It's nice to have higher traffic and SEO but, if your site is 95 % nootropics and 5 % LE, then you aren't promoting LE, you are promoting nootropics. I think this site is now atracting a lot more nootropists than immortalists. Maybe some nootropists can become interested in LE by reading this site, but the opposite can also be true: some immortalists can leave the site (or post only rarely) because it's mostly a nootropics site.


Edited by Antonio2014, 24 October 2014 - 12:28 PM.

  • like x 2





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: site

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users