Posted 20 November 2005 - 07:36 PM
Let me quote prometheus "This suggests that SIRT1 could be a DNA damage response regulator."
So in subjects without the SIRT1 gene, their bodies would not respond to DNA damage in the same way or at all.
If this was implemented in humans, the gene taken away... then DNA damage could perhaps happen without response. Could this lead to a painfull an agonizing death?
Another quote from prometh "Paradoxically, when this gene is overexpressed in yeast and C. elegans it extends lifespan."
I think I have a general idea of how it extends the lifespan. When it is overexpressed perhaps it allows better response to DNA damage, thus extending life.
Complete lack of it allows much longer life extention. Why? Perhaps it just allows a certain ignorance about cell damage occuring. The cells can continue to replicate in an infinite matter. Perhaps the death is when the cells are so badly damaged that they can no longer continue to work.
This is just a shot in the air, but it sounds pretty sweet to the ears. So, perhaps a genetically engineered gene that allows infinite cell replication while maintaining those cells is in order for the ingredients of the fountain of youth.
I need to know more about the condition of the yeast cells which were removed.
If you are confused by this, you haven't read the article on yeast living 6x longer.