There is an "anti-cryonics" website at http://www.saveted.net. This site has been up, in various forms, since around 2002, when the Ted Williams story became news.
The site makes the claim that funding cryonics through life insurance is possibly illegal:
Another issue concerns the promotion of life insurance for use by
cryonics clients to finance the treatment process. There appears to be
a potential conflict in purpose for such applications as outlined in the
article,"Vinny, Vidi, Vici," February 2005, posted on this website.
Investigation of this questionable insurance practice should be of interest
to national regulators and private policy providers.
In that regard, during April 2005, inquiry request memos were provided
to several federal agencies and a private regulatory group to determine
the validity of such practice.
In addition to enforcement of insurance regulations, Federal agencies can
utilize provisions of Ricco Statues. Prima facia evidence was submitted.
I'm not sure what the author means by "private regulatory group". It could just mean himself and a friend. LOL.
It might be a good idea if Alcor's website included a brief rebuttal to this. Perhaps another entry under the "Misinformed Questions" would be appropriate?
http://alcor.org/FAQs/faq07.html
-Bryan Hall