6 replies to this topic

[A941]

What do you think about this article:

http://transhumanity...rrect-the-dead/

[Danail Bulgaria]

I think, that Quantum Archeology is quite possible. The bad another thing is that the resurrected you will not be you, but a copy of you. 

 

If you are interested in that, you may find @the hanged man He seems to know a lot about the Quantum Archeology. 

Two of his interesting topics are here:

http://www.longecity...quantum-theory/

http://www.longecity...um-archaeology/

 

In order to reqriut more people the site, which you show, has to explain at the beginning in simple words and in brief what is it all about for Quantum Archeology. 

[Julia36]

I think, that Quantum Archeology is quite possible. The bad another thing is that the resurrected you will not be you, but a copy of you. 

 

If you are interested in that, you may find @the hanged man He seems to know a lot about the Quantum Archeology. 

Two of his interesting topics are here:

http://www.longecity...quantum-theory/

http://www.longecity...um-archaeology/

 

In order to reqriut more people the site, which you show, has to explain at the beginning in simple words and in brief what is it all about for Quantum Archeology. 

 

 

 

It is possible to have 2 copies of a thing without either losing its identity.

 

For that to be false , you would have to show how 2 individuals are different in other than timespace, which is impossible. 

 

For the purposes of Quantum Archaeology information is key to definition, since micro assembly robots are anticipated to be enough to reconstruct from recipies drawn from the Quantum Archaeology Grid, anyone who has lived....or could have lived.

 

 

 

eg printed books are regarded as identical copies. So are atoms.

 

The Many Worlds Theory show zillions of yous exist.

They only become different as different history modifies them.

 

http://www.hedweb.co...tm#relativistic

 

Your argument, which you have raised before, seems to be an argument to an unknown.

That was also Robert Ettinger's objection to Quantum Archaeology, but doesn't seem to be science?

 

We are already constructing resurrections.

 

"

Ancestral gene resurrection

We have played an important role in developing a new strategy for studying protein evolution called ancestral gene resurrection. We use computational phylogenetic methods to infer ancestral sequences, followed by gene synthesis to synthesize them and experimental techniques to characterize them. We use cell biological, biochemical, and biophysical methods, as well as (by collaboration) X-ray crystallography and molecular dynamics approaches, to elucidate the functions, structures, and biophysical properties of ancestral proteins. With ancient proteins in hand, we can also introduce the mutations that occurred during crucial evolutionary periods to test hypotheses about the the specific effects caused by each historical genetic change.

Molecular evolution of hormones and their receptors

How did hormones and their diverse functions in humans and other animals evolve? We study the evolution of vertebrate steroid hormones -- such as estrogen, testosterone, and the stress hormone cortisol -- and the receptor proteins that mediate these hormones' effects on the body's cells. Our goal is to reveal the specific molecular events by which hormones, receptors, and their DNA targets evolved their specific partnerships during the last 600 million years or so. We are characterizing receptor biodiversity across the animal kingdom, testing hypotheses about the functions of ancient proteins, and determining the specific mutations and changes in protein structure by which new receptor functions evolved hundreds of millions of years ago."

http://genes.uchicag...ornton-joe.html

 

 

 

 

The principle of interchangeability states that if a thing is identical in every respect it must be assumed to be that thing.

 

Why shouldn't there be many of you at any moment?

 

QA has made predictions which have already succeeded. Things long extinct have been constructed by statistics

and tested inside living organisms; extinct unit species are being brought back and calculation power will  at some point be big enough to reconfigure then reconstruct extinct unit people.

 

It is illogical to argue an extinct species can be reconfigured and resurrected but an extinct person cannot.

 

The issue is size of calculation.

 

Your argument on function is better  ie function is irrelevant to identity.

But that is irrelevant to QA since human resurrections and not digital resurrection are discussed.

 

You have to show HOW 2 things are different in order to argue they are not interchangeable. Interchangeability is not equality.

Edited by the hanged man, 26 September 2015 - 05:47 PM.

[platypus]

Perhaps you have already been copied and simulated. Do you feel a benefit?

[ceridwen]

If I have been simulated they need to redesign my Avatar and fast if they want me to stay in the game. They probably don't

[Multivitz]

I am my Avatar, I am honest and as true as my environment allows. I don't need someone elses machine to have a say in where my self goes, I can make my own way thanks, my self exists as an infinate possibility of potentials(I can't see anything better than that, trying to help others realise this is extremely easy for me). Quantum Physics shows there is an infinate nature to matter, it made a bigger faster Hadron Collider to see this infinate nature(over and over it sees this infinite nature, it will only have voids to fool the foolish, then it carries on and on forever and ever, over and over again, radiating, diserpaiting, combining, transmuting before time has seen a sign). Personally I think the latest one is not teaching anyone anything, and that the main theory used is about to change it's tune, as it can not survive, in it's idiocy, without corrections. This dark matter scoff has got to stop, you won't find it, it does not exist so you won't be able to bottle it and use it as an advanced weapon. Such a greedy waste in the name of a god particle lol. The greedy nuclearphiles should be looking at Thorium, the East is well on it's way to Thorium instead of weapons grade rubbish.

Our own personal collection of consciouses are the echo of their potentials shining through ourselves. Yeah, it would be a tricky experiment to do, unless you asked for some familiarity.

Millions of years lol, what does that mean? Our genes are reflections of our environments, yet some think there is a key to a greater knowledge from their study lol. The crystaline folding is intresting, it is heavily influenced by the diet/enviroment, we know that already, we as a specie have a chequed past. Maybe answer OUR planets past history, before going all paleotonic on us? No offence intended.
Intention and beliefs are never given the importance they deserve, but when focused can give the student great insight to their endeavours.

Edited by Multivitz, 13 January 2016 - 05:17 PM.

[Multivitz]

http://ssnaturalheal...isease.html?m=1
The above is an example of the kind of thing that works when the other thing is: https://en.m.wikiped...tionary_baggage

We evolve through our environment, not through time. Measuring the time between events is heresay as there are many factors that culminate change (in many systems).