
Which Epigenetic Clock Is Best For Evaluating Death Risk?
#1
Posted 14 May 2025 - 11:27 AM
#2
Posted 31 May 2025 - 07:27 PM
OK it is N=1 experiment (from an expert: Matt Kaeberlein), but result is definitely not good! Use all these clocks with caution!
min 14:09 on ..https://www.youtube....h?v=hySlWn0f9m8 ...
Screenshot 2025-05-31 212133.png 604.62KB
0 downloads
Edited by albedo, 31 May 2025 - 08:14 PM.
#3
Posted 31 May 2025 - 07:34 PM
OK it is N=1 (from an expert: Matt Kaeberlein) experiment, but definitely not good! Use all these clocks with caution!
min 14:09 on ..https://www.youtube....h?v=hySlWn0f9m8 ...
As shown in the video, all epigenetic clocks are not the same for their association with all-cause mortality risk. Some of the clocks that Matt discussed haven't been compared like that
Even with his criticism, I prefer to measure the actual biomarkers underlying the epigenetic clocks, which is discussed in the video, too...
#4
Posted 01 June 2025 - 10:22 AM
As shown in the video, all epigenetic clocks are not the same for their association with all-cause mortality risk. Some of the clocks that Matt discussed haven't been compared like that
Even with his criticism, I prefer to measure the actual biomarkers underlying the epigenetic clocks, which is discussed in the video, too...
"...prefer to measure the actual biomarkers underlying the epigenetic clocks..." fair point, thank you.
#5
Posted Yesterday, 06:31 AM
From Gladyschev's team. Still in preprint. I think it is an important way forward technically and might be a tip for one of your next nice videos to consider. I expect you have seen this already, sorry ... ;-)
High-dimensional Ageome Representations of Biological Aging across Functional Modules
https://www.biorxiv.....09.17.613599v1
"...When applied to human cohorts, Ageome demonstrated het32erogeneity in predictive power for mortality risk, and some modules showed better performance 33 in predicting the onset of age-related diseases, especially cancer, compared to existing clocks..."
(BTW, will you happen to be in a coming aging conference when one can meet?)
Edited by albedo, Yesterday, 06:35 AM.
#6
Posted Yesterday, 11:52 AM
From Gladyschev's team. Still in preprint. I think it is an important way forward technically and might be a tip for one of your next nice videos to consider. I expect you have seen this already, sorry ... ;-)
High-dimensional Ageome Representations of Biological Aging across Functional Modules
https://www.biorxiv.....09.17.613599v1
"...When applied to human cohorts, Ageome demonstrated het32erogeneity in predictive power for mortality risk, and some modules showed better performance 33 in predicting the onset of age-related diseases, especially cancer, compared to existing clocks..."
(BTW, will you happen to be in a coming aging conference when one can meet?)
My take-home message:
"Ageome consistently matched the predictive power of GrimAgeV2 and PhenoAge across the examined disease categories."
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: blood testing
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users