..and I am getting tired of people around here just reporting subjective experiences (reporting their placebo effects, essentially).
Before and after, I am going to get a blood test. So here is your challenge:
I don't want to spend "hundreds" on a full spectrum aging bio-markers test.
Don't know what specific would be appropriate to track quercetine effects. But you don't have to spent 'hundreds' on the most basic lab tests - which usually are covered by insurance - and which should show some effects (if you had health conditions to begin with):
CBC, electrolytes, thyroid, kidney and liver function markers, basic cholesterol panel, fasting and postprandial glucose, blood pressure, HbA1c, CRP, homocysteine, cortisol, testosterone, iron markers, copper are the most basic. The most important would be having such tested before, and a couple of months after commencing supplementation of a particular compound.
In a world where a substance has to be patentable to be proven effective all we have is subjective experience, and which is also all what you'll ever get from your trial. And to be honest, subjectively being healed by non-patentable compounds is what I never would become tired of. Especially with a condition otherwise not reversible by patentable pharmaceuticals, as in my case.
Long live the placebo effect!
Edited by pamojja, 16 May 2016 - 08:35 PM.