• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

two new studies: 300 minutes of jogging per week will protect both hea


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 baden-baden

  • Guest
  • 32 posts
  • 42
  • Location:Paris

Posted 02 August 2011 - 11:00 PM


"It’s no secret that exercise is good for the heart, but also for the brain. A new review reported in Circulation, journal of the American Heart Association, which focus on the precise amount of physical activity, states that practicing physical exercice (probably moderately) at least for 2 hours and 30 minutes throughout the week, and better yet, 5 hours, has very interesting effects on heart health. In the first case, the participants had a 14 percent lower risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) compared those who don’t exercise. In the second case, the risk was 20% lower than the non-physical. In a study printed in the August 2, 2011, issue of Neurology — American Academy of Neurology, researchers show that smoking, obesity, high blood pressure and diabete may cause brain lowering and rapidly involve cognitive problems that remains. This study was conduct with 1352 participants with an average age of 54. “These factors appeared to cause the brain to lose volume, to develop lesions secondary to presumed vascular injury, and also appeared to affect its ability to plan and make decisions as quickly as 10 years later”, said study author C. DeCarli, MD. “In the middle age” (so that’s biologically relevant for everybody) high blood pressure, diabete, obesity, overweight and smoking lead people to have worse results in tests of decision making, planning, executive functions. Damage occur in the brain and its volume decrease. So, 300 minutes physical training per week would be a good start to avoid those problems and protect the heart — but don’t force too much."
http://singularityne...eart-and-brain/

#2 1kgcoffee

  • Guest
  • 737 posts
  • 254

Posted 03 August 2011 - 12:44 AM

Exercise is good for you? Preposterous!

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for EXERCISE to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 03 August 2011 - 01:47 AM

Five hours of jogging? Umm, something tells me that is not the way to go. Need some lifts, maybe some sprints.
  • like x 1

#4 Ellipticality

  • Guest
  • 43 posts
  • 12
  • Location:Canada

Posted 18 October 2011 - 11:26 PM

niner, as far as longevity goes, is there any evidence that intense workouts like sprinting and heavy weight lifting is beneficial?

To me its seems that more relaxed exercise like jogging and some moderate weight lifting would be the way to go, varying intensity, sure, but not trying to push your maximum.

I just think that our body would be able to handle much more than is actually good for it (in the long run). And lets face it, even if we do workout hard and keep pushing our maximum, tryingt to get stronger and faster, most people wont be able, or wont bother to maintain that level of fitness and just go back to normal eventually anyways.

#5 Mike C

  • Guest
  • 84 posts
  • 12

Posted 24 March 2012 - 09:01 PM

ken Cooper once remarked that 'if your jogging more than 15 miles a week your doing for something other than health." Cooper the father of Aerobics and his institute have done more scientifically than any other institution to advance the understanding of the benefits and the amount needed to optimize benefits of aerobic exercise. I have a couple of his books and he breaks it all down to a point system. 50 pts. a week will give one excellent results health wise-thats about 20 minutes of jogging at 5 mph a day or a very brisk 45 minute walk a day, about 4 mph for most people. healthwise there is no point in doing more-unless you enjoy it or you are a competetive athlete. Of course that is the aerobic side-Cooper and his son in their latest book emphasize weight training along with aerobics and consider this especially important as we get older.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for EXERCISE to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#6 buckwheats

  • Guest
  • 38 posts
  • 19
  • Location:san francisco

Posted 24 March 2012 - 10:00 PM

you get a more intense physiological response when you do high intensity exercise, which is probably a good thing if you believe in hormesis..

here's a study form 2011 on cyclists
http://www.scienceda...10829070507.htm


A study conducted among cyclists in Copenhagen, Denmark showed that it is the relative intensity and not the duration of cycling which is of most importance in relation to all-cause mortality and even more pronounced for coronary heart disease mortality

The study, presented at the ESC Congress 2011, concluded that men with fast intensity cycling survived 5.3 years longer, and men with average intensity 2.9 years longer than men with slow cycling intensity. For women the figures were 3.9 and 2.2 years longer, respectively (see Figures below). The groups were adjusted for differences in age and conventional risk factor levels.


Edited by buckwheats, 24 March 2012 - 10:01 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users