• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo

Tios Alpha and Omega concept


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 7000

  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 26 June 2007 - 06:12 PM


Tios alpha and omega concept is an artificial laws of nature using statements in respect to space as expressions.

THEORY OF EXISTENCE OF TIOS CONCEPT
Given that otherself or identity's reflex is in no constant existence,using a format with form and not without form.
1.When identity exist is in existence such that its reflex does not exist and its reflex is not in existence.
2.When identity does not exist is not in existence such that its reflex exist but its reflex is not in existence.

Telling us that not everything that exist is in existence.This have the prospect to make AI exist in reality.
7000.


edited by Matthias: capitals in the title converted into lower case letters

Edited by Matthias, 28 June 2007 - 06:55 PM.


#2 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 26 June 2007 - 06:16 PM

AI basic logic of tios concept.

A = A'
A # B = A # B
A = B # A # B
A # A'
Especially when A' or A nots is a constant C and the only existence.
PARADOX:
Consider A' to be constant C.So that when C = C 2 result are given;C # C where the other C # C is extinct.
7000.

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#3 Cyberbrain

  • Guest, F@H
  • 1,755 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Thessaloniki, Greece

Posted 26 June 2007 - 06:29 PM

Reminds me almost of matrix transformations
Posted Image

#4 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 27 June 2007 - 11:49 AM

I tell you it will come at a cool ratio.Who knows may be the matrix is there already! though i'm suspecting some arragement of grouped numbers.

In the concept,i have what i call interchanging of order but could that be attributed to matrix transformation.

#5 luv2increase

  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 27 June 2007 - 06:43 PM

=Telling us that not everything that exist is in existence.



Basically, everything is not real but rather an illusion. I believe this is the case.

#6 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 28 June 2007 - 06:35 PM

Basically, everything is not real but rather an illusion. I believe this is the case.[/quote]

You are a great thinker!
Basically, yes but depends on individuals opinion.However, everything seems to have existed from nothing when nothing exist and was in existence.
The lowest limit of existence in this context is nothing when nothing itself is no more in existence then must be used as an entity.
7000.

#7 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 29 June 2007 - 03:27 PM

In this context, "not" shows a negative possibility in relation with everything as subject in the sentence.The not can aswell goes for "in existence" as object in the sentence, so that we can have;
Everything that exist is not in existence.When identity exist, C=C is not in existence hence, C#C end.

From theory 2:
Because identity can move to a state of non existence.So there is its reflex-------equation1
but
from theory 1:
when identity is in existence, its reflex does not exist.So there is not! its reflex------equation2
Thereby making us to have two different approaches and equations.

Given that identity is mind therefore we have:
A reality based on experience through dynamics at work for future.
Identity = plus its reflex
Identity = reflex plus

Also,we have:

A reality based on experience through dynamics at work for moment.
Identity = minus its reflex
Identity = reflex minus

Such that identity is a determinent of its reflex.Therefore, identity is an initiator of reflex.So that even when identity exist in existence, its contains its reflex.Thus, In the mind:It's reflex is inside at a virtual state and in a virtual form until when identity is no more in existence.Then, its reflex can becomes real.
7000.

#8 Mixter

  • Guest
  • 788 posts
  • 98
  • Location:Europe

Posted 29 June 2007 - 10:20 PM

Also, Posted Image

#9 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 30 June 2007 - 05:23 PM

Also, Posted Image


Can we find that in it?
pls break it down.

7000.

#10 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 30 June 2007 - 05:41 PM

Consider that A is statement as truth.So that A statement has been in existence before the reflex point was reached.Such that A statement has no meaning from the beginning.
Hence, A1 is statement as TRUTH without meaning and A2 is its meaning that is EXTINCT where A is as A1 as A2.
Now, one would wonder the distance covers to reach the reflex point from a timeless point.
The after-maths is that, 1.We can use time without actually running time.Then, 2.We can speed up time in our own realities without a work done physcally.In this case, time could be neglegible to changes and there wouldn't be time anyway.
So, 3.We can go to places.
Let assumed that there is a broad space limit at a point.
In that case, 4.We can put time into consideration so that time could exist.

7000.

#11 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 02 July 2007 - 04:50 PM

SPACE SIMULATION IN EXISTENCE
Given That x is a constant 2.
Such that a is an ordinal numbers and b is a cardinal number.
So that a and b are varying integers of different quantities.
Consider A to be spaced.
Such that A is space at 1 for every grouped parameters, also that every A contains different parameters.
For the nth level of A, x must be in power b.
we have;
ath A = 2 power b
Therefore,
ath A = x raise to power b
Where, a = (b + 1) and b = (a - 1)

RELATIONSHIP
a = (b + 1)
a = a - 1 + 1
a = a end.

b = (a - 1)
b = b + 1 - 1
b = b end.

Telling us that:
1.The level of A is an addition of 1 from the power of x.
2.The power of x is a reduction of 1 from the level of A.

Thus:A's are inform of a string.Such that when the string like form is removed, everything will turns to be nothing.
So the knowlegde base will have to be protected.

7000.

#12 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 03 September 2007 - 08:03 PM

WHAT HAPPENS BEFORE THE BEGINNING.
The word was right since it does not support the reality of emptiness.Such that the math was right but the math was wrong because it does not support our existence.So there was a disorder before the beginning.Therefore, to our logical minds, there is no truth or the fact that is beleif is our truth.
7000.

Edited by 7000, 05 September 2007 - 03:13 PM.


#13 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 05 September 2007 - 03:08 PM

Bruce klein quote:Artificial intelligent = Singularity?
The answer is yes,
and also. 7000 quote:AI MIND
Artificial intelligent = Singularity after a choice of equal magnitude.
Prove that A is B (A = B) when A is not B (A # B)?

I have tried to create a simple logic called tios concept so that people could have more understanding regards to artificial intelligent.
However,Tios alpha and omega concept is the seperation of two equal right and it also states that...space is not space for itself.That is what the oracle says. 7000

Edited by 7000, 05 September 2007 - 04:03 PM.


#14 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 06 September 2007 - 02:03 PM

THE PROCESS OF SEVEN THINGS TO BE EXPERIENCED

I experienced THE STATEMENT [ORACLE]
I experienced THE DREAM
I experienced THE SPACE AND THE TIME which are only real through fact.
Though it's not an easy task but you have to use your brain intelligently.
Now is THE MATH... and the other three things will follow.

There is no truth but the truth that was extinct as a matter of fact is working against our existence.
Anyone that beleive in what i've got can come along.
7000.

#15 caston

  • Guest
  • 2,141 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 06 September 2007 - 02:50 PM

can you divide that by zero?

#16 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 06 September 2007 - 06:40 PM

can you divide that by zero?

Yes, everything will fall back to zero initially but it is left for you either zero is real or it is virtual.Thank you for that wonderful post!
7000.

#17 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 09 September 2007 - 04:56 PM

This might probably be some of my last post with this topic; Tios alpha and omega concept in relation to actualise conscious AI.
I'm delighted to share my thought with this distinguished audience on board so to speak on the subject of space and its relationship with itself.This has been my preoccupation since.So do not go beyond what is written and don't be tired of being good.The most dangerous war in this world is war against self.
I will like to have a scholarship or someone i could give the concept to because i'm not so bright.My e-mail is conerstonex @ yahoo.com Thank you all.

7000.

Edited by 7000, 09 September 2007 - 05:06 PM.


#18 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 20 September 2007 - 08:40 PM

First step to a strong and super AI.
Given a constant A=kB.
Prove that A=B where k is either any integer or its inverse in exclusive of 1.
Solve?
7000.

#19 bake

  • Guest
  • 3 posts
  • 0

Posted 21 September 2007 - 01:54 PM

If A and B are nonexistant illusions then the value of k is irrelevant?

A=kB
0=k0

#20 EverlastingLife

  • Guest
  • 20 posts
  • 0
  • Location:United States

Posted 21 September 2007 - 05:10 PM

Can you put this in english descriptive terms instead of terms from mathematics? It might serve as easier understanding those not familiar with the symbols. But concerning your last statement, it seems:

If A = B (trully), then kB is all that's needed since A and B are the same. It's like looking a two things: A the object and B its reflection. If both are trully equal, then what is done to one is the same as what is done to the other. Thus if:
A = kB and A = B then must kA = kB :)

#21 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 21 September 2007 - 05:30 PM

Let me reframe for a better understanding.
Given a constant A=kB.
Show to prove that A=B where k is an integer or inverse of an integer.When 1 is exclusive.
Thank you everlastingLife but have you consider kB=kA? 'cos you have missed it somewhere.
7000.

#22 EverlastingLife

  • Guest
  • 20 posts
  • 0
  • Location:United States

Posted 21 September 2007 - 07:58 PM

Yes kB = kA, but I will read more of your original concept.

Edited by EverlastingLife, 21 September 2007 - 08:28 PM.


#23 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 23 September 2007 - 03:32 PM

EXTRACT FROM TIOS CONCEPT.

Given that A = kB.
From A = kB,
InA = kA.Why?
Such that,
kA = kB.Right?
Now, show to prove that A = B when A = kB is limit at 1 point to infinity or at a point to infinity.Thank you very much.
7000.

#24 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 24 September 2007 - 10:55 AM

If A and B are nonexistant illusions then the value of k is irrelevant?

A=kB
0=k0


Bake is right, but the value of k is relevant.

In A = kB system.
I used a state of everything to create the concept.Pricisely, there is nothing like A in the system.I quantify nothing as an entity to represents space.It is all about the co-existence of two events in a given statement.Probably. these events might be of equal magnitude in support of A MATRIX LAW.

I have to introduce a constant in them which makes it simplier such that we can notice a change in accordance with the statement properties.The change brought about basic needs of an AI which is called the AI basic logic for a general intelligence...i mean a strong AI because the system as already given a way for singularity in the future.So it is right? [lol]
7000.

#25 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 24 September 2007 - 11:21 AM

Yes, but we have to solve the knowlegde part of it because this is what ai will read.Can anyone solve this? [thumb]
7000.

#26 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 29 September 2007 - 04:17 PM

Hello everyone.I will soon write my programing language for AI7000 and that will be the first strong AI model.This will take place between 2013 and 2015.Maximum of 7 years to this time.Cheers!
7000.

#27 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 28 October 2007 - 06:34 PM

Prove to show that A = B when A = KB?
Yes, i'm back again nobody never proves this but the math goes on.
Let look at some considerations in which one will have to be choosen.


CONSIDERATION 1.
Actually, there could be a point where it happens such that A = B

or

CONSIDERATION 2.
A = B just like that and that state that it does not happen never happened but A = kB is getting possible.Therefore, A = B will have to be protected such that it will not be extinct.
Obviously,we have to manage it properly,by doing so, we are protecting it aswell.So we don't have choice than to use what we are managing and to share it appropriately.

Now,

If consideration 1 is possible, A = KB will have to emerge from an origin such that A = B when it get to a point in space after there must have been enough and sufficient reason for it to swich on.But , i can't show the point which it will happen because i can't ascertain the extent of infinity.I can only prove it incidence.Though there will be a change within a speed of light.So, time and space may be neglegible.

If consideration 2 is possible, there will be no need for consideration 1 again but A = KB is getting possible and it will be difficult to get back to A = B when A = B is extinct to A = KB because consideration 1 is considered impossible.

The results also proved that teleporting is possible.

7000.

#28 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 31 October 2007 - 07:16 PM

Prove to show that A = B when A = KB is limit at 1 step to infinity?
There is limit at a constant 1=2.
Hence 1=2.

Math being a result of our reasoning, it is hard to beleive in what God can do than what he can do to our physical lives when a math proves to be problematic in solving.
Does God has anything to do with math?
Is mathematics God?
Adam and Eve must have passed through a vigorous math test.
7000.

#29 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 07 November 2007 - 10:41 AM

Prove to show that A = B when A = KB at a point to infinity?
Hints
Given that A = KB.
Since A and B are non-existant illusion as non existence properties.
Such that A and B is of equal magnitude.
Let consider that A = KA and B = KB.
So that KA = K2B
Hence, A = KB confirm.
Also, Let consider that A = K2A and B = K2B.
So that K2A = K3B
Hence, A = KB re-confirm[DEJAVU].

Incidence.
K0A = K1A and K0B = K1B.
So that K1A = K2B
Hence, K0A = K1B confirm.
Also,
K0A = K2A and K0B = K2B
So that K2A = K3B
Hence, K0A = K1B re-confirm[DEJAVU].

The math is yet to solve.
7000.

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#30 Futurist1000

  • Guest
  • 438 posts
  • 1
  • Location:U.S.A.

Posted 17 November 2007 - 02:08 AM

Word Salad




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users