• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

* * - - - 3 votes

5G will be making us ALL Sick & Killing us and your Pets!

sick killing aging deadly

  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic
⌛⇒ MITOMOUSE has been fully funded!

#31 Hip

  • Guest
  • 534 posts
  • 219
  • Location:X

Posted 22 May 2019 - 04:02 AM

One difference between 2G/3G/4G and 5G is that 5G is directed into a beam which points at the mobile phone in contact with the 5G base station. I presume this will result in less electromagnetic radiation in the environment. 


At present with 2G, 3G and 4G, if you are making a telephone call, the base station which sends the electromagnetic signal to your phone actually radiates that signal in all directions, ie, in 360º. So everyone around the base station gets irradiated as a result of you telephone call. But with 5G the signal is confined to a beam around 60º to 120º pointing in the direction of the mobile phone. So in that respect 5G may reduce electromagnetic radiation exposure compared to 2G, 3G and 4G.



Another difference is that the higher frequencies of 5G mean the electromagnetic signal only penetrates only the outer layer of the skin, unlike 2G, 3G and 4G technology which pass through the body. So 5G is not going to get deep into the body. However, it might damage surface areas such as eyes, skin and sperm.


Ref: here.





#32 ceridwen

  • Guest
  • 1,289 posts
  • 94

Member Away
  • Location:UK

Posted 24 May 2019 - 08:21 PM

LED street lights on the other hand can cause disruption to the body's nitrogen monoxide system that keeps genes healthy can control gene expression. Any ideas anyone as to how this could be protected?
  • Needs references x 1

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Advertisements help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. [] To go ad-free join as a Member.

#33 Hip

  • Guest
  • 534 posts
  • 219
  • Location:X

Posted 24 May 2019 - 08:24 PM

LED street lights on the other hand can cause disruption to the body's nitrogen monoxide system that keeps genes healthy can control gene expression. 


Sounds very improbable. Where did you read that? 

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Advertisements help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. [] To go ad-free join as a Member.

#34 Mind

  • Life Member, Moderator, Secretary
  • 16,425 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 19 October 2019 - 11:02 AM

Here, a scientist states what everyone is talking about, that no one knows for sure if there are risks associated with 5G: https://blogs.scient...eve-5g-is-safe/


Here is a list of studies on radiation exposure: https://drive.google...sAdYl3Eur3/view


If cellphone radiation (and all other sorts of EMFs) were definitively "cancer-causing", it would have shown up in the data by now. It could be contributing to the rise in cancer incidence, but it would be hard to tell for sure because there are so many other factors in modern life that could be causing cancer. Your age is still the primary driver of your cancer risk.

#35 Vitalist

  • Guest
  • 25 posts
  • 5
  • Location:Canada

Posted 19 October 2019 - 09:49 PM

Bees dying under 5G poles

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Advertisements help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. [] To go ad-free join as a Member.

#36 zorba990

  • Guest
  • 1,392 posts
  • 211

Posted 20 October 2019 - 12:00 AM

(Old man shakes fist at the sky -- get off my lawn!)

There is no consciousness wrt testing this kind of thing. Just more and more zombies staring at their devices and ordering things from online vendors.
People will become lost in the noise with less and less downtime. Subjectively, the under 30's I work with have much less productivity than the older folks -- they cannot break from their devices.
They complain of not sleeping, they and their kids get sick often. Their focus and concentration is obviously lacking.

High tech schools are failing : https://www.business...y-booker-2018-5

Enter into the next phase of modern life with your eyes open and look up once in a while. Tech leaders are sending their kids to tech-free schools -- ask yourself why?

It's not just the direct (and real) potential of frequency and energy to alter biological systems. We are losing touch with the part of the brain that created all this in the first place.

The interaction between electromagnetic fields at megahertz, gigahertz and terahertz frequencies with cells, tissues and organisms: risks and potential

Some in vivo studies have also been performed on animals [141]; fruit flies were exposed to 2.5 and 6.69 THz with power in the range of 1–10 mW for about 2 h; this resulted in alterations in gene expression [141,142]. Simulations predicted a total temperature increase of just 0.5°C, not a dramatic thermal shock, especially considering that during flying the active heat production of muscles may cause an increase in body temperature of 10°C or more. Terahertz radiation also affects warm-blooded animals who have body temperature control. In experiments conducted on mice exposed briefly to terahertz (3.6 THz, λ = 81.5 µm, 15 mW, 15 min) behavioural alterations were observed, especially in anxiety states [141,143]. In the same fashion, exposure of rats to 150.176–150.664 GHz at radiation power 4 mW and power flow 3 mW cm−2 for durations of up to 1 h demonstrated the development of depression in the tested animals [141,144]. The same group later designed more complex experiments and used experimental animals with induced hypokinetic stress, after conditioning animals were subjected to the same terahertz radiation protocol but of a lower intensity. Tests showed changes in blood antioxidant activity with respect to the control group, and the authors hypothesized a key role for nitric oxide (NO) molecules as an intermediator of biological effects [145]. Utilization of label-free detection of NO in injured neurons has been done by Abbas et al. [146]. In the study, the medicinal leech nervous cord was slightly damaged, and change in the formation of NO was monitored by observing the changes in sample's transmission in the range of 140–220 GHz. Introduction of the nerve lesion resulted into decreased in transmission coefficient 0.8 dB comparatively with the intact tissue and along all tested frequency range. Within 15 min after the injury, some slow recovery towards initial values appeared, probably due to degradation on NO in the test chamber. An additional test with the addition of NO production blocker (L-NAME) demonstrated no significant change in transmission spectra when compared with controls.

Edited by zorba990, 20 October 2019 - 12:02 AM.

Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: sick, killing, aging, deadly

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users