11 replies to this topic

[zorba990]

From the Journal of Medical Ethics:
COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities
https://jme.bmj.com/...jme-2022-108449

As a forward thinking scientific forum,
let's be properly curious of this new experimental injection, before continuing to recommend it's use, especially in the young and healthy.
Let's not throw around hate speech and needless ad-hominem attacks and labeling, but rather look at the data.

"Conclusion
Based on public data provided by the CDC,19 we estimate that in the fall of 2022 at least 31 207–42 836 young adults aged 18–29 years must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one Omicron-related COVID-19 hospitalisation over 6 months. Given the fact that this estimate does not take into account the protection conferred by prior infection or a risk adjustment for comorbidity status, this should be considered a conservative and optimistic assessment of benefit. Our estimate shows that university COVID-19 vaccine mandates are likely to cause net expected harms to young healthy adults—for each hospitalisation averted we estimate approximately 18.5 SAEs and 1430–4626 disruptions of daily activities—that is not outweighed by a proportionate public health benefit. Serious COVID-19 vaccine-associated harms are not adequately compensated for by current US vaccine injury systems. As such, these severe infringements of individual liberty and human rights are ethically unjustifiable.

Mandates are also associated with wider social harms. The fact that such policies were implemented despite controversy among experts and without updating the sole publicly available risk-benefit analysis19 to the current Omicron variants nor submitting the methods to public scrutiny suggests a profound lack of transparency in scientific and regulatory policy making. These findings have implications for mandates in other settings such as schools, corporations, healthcare systems and the military. Policymakers should repeal COVID-19 vaccine mandates for young adults immediately and ensure pathways to compensation to those who have suffered negative consequences from these policies. Regulatory agencies should facilitate independent scientific analysis through open access to participant-level clinical trial data to allow risk-stratified and age-stratified risk-benefit analyses of any new vaccines prior to issuing recommendations.125 This is needed to begin what will be a long process of rebuilding trust in public health."

[Mr Serendipity]

yes

[zorba990]

Unethical & unscientific trials exposed by court ordered released data showing that 3k of the 4500 babies did not finish the trials & Pfizer neglected to list why.
The trials also show increased covid after vax, & no reduction in transmission!

https://twitter.com/...610561832017922

Edited by zorba990, 20 December 2022 - 12:50 AM.

[Dorian Grey]

OpenVAERS

 

https://openvaers.com/

 

is the most enlightening source I've seen regarding harm from the mRNA jabs.  

 

The Horror...  The Horror!  

Edited by Dorian Grey, 20 December 2022 - 02:17 AM.

[zorba990]

Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons
After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna

https://ijvtpr.com/i...cle/view/47/123

Many case studies in there. Certainly sets a precedent for anyone symptomatic and suspecting mRNAids to get their blood checked out.

"In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documentedin the peripheral bloodprofileof 948 patients havenever been observed after inoculation by any vaccinesin the past according to our clinical experience."

Edited by zorba990, 24 December 2022 - 01:39 AM.

[zorba990]

Now that Twitter is less Censored, more information is coming out about possible side effects from mRNA injections.
Some examples:


"1. The DAM is breaking in Japan, two more professors speaking out against the vaccine
Prof. Masanaka Nagao from Hiroshima University School of Medicine
“We believe the vax is related to immune abnormalities”
https://twitter.com/...008929430769665

"2. and Prof Shigetoshi Sano from Kochi University School Of Medicine demonstrating mechanism of action of adverse reaction caused by vaccination"
https://twitter.com/...008954844078080

[Mind]

To answer the question in the title of this thread, if the Pfizer trial data is any guide, then we are talking about hundreds of millions people being harmed or killed by the COVID injections, perhaps over billion.

 

Recall that in the Pfizer trial that nearly 3% of the participants died. There were tens of thousands of adverse events reported among a sample size of 42,000. At the time, some commentators said "people die", it happens all the time. However, I have never seen a drug ever being approved when 3% of the participants die or when nearly all of them suffered an adverse event. Usually 1 person dies in a trial and everything is stopped immediately.

 

Also, a lot of the data in this thread is similar to this longer discussion which also tracks concerns about the COVID injections based upon peer-reviewed research around the world.

Edited by Mind, 28 December 2022 - 06:53 PM.

[zorba990]

Booster Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines and Myocarditis Risk in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Nordic Cohort Study of 8.9 Million Residents
https://www.medrxiv....2.16.22283603v1

"Results A total of 8.9 million residents were followed for 12,271,861 person-years. We identified 1533 cases of myocarditis. In 12-to-39-year-old males, the 28-day acute risk period following the third dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 was associated with an increased incidence rate of myocarditis compared to the post-acute risk period 28 days or more after a second homologous dose (IRR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.31 to 3.33] and 8.89 [95% CI, 2.26 to 35.03], respectively). The corresponding incidence rates following the third dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were 0.86 and 1.95, respectively, within 28 days of follow-up among 100,000 individuals.

Conclusions and Relevance Our results suggest that a booster dose is associated with increased myocarditis risk in male adolescents and young male adults.

Question Is a first booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine associated with increased risk of myocarditis in male adolescents and young male adults?

Findings In a cohort study of 8.9 million residents in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, a booster dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine was associated with increased risk of myocarditis in 12-to-39-year-old males, with incidence rates 0.86 and 1.95, respectively, within 28 days of follow-up per 100,000 vaccinated individuals.

Meaning A booster dose with a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine is associated with increased myocarditis risk in male adolescents and young male adults. Compared to after a primary course, the risk appears attenuated."

[zorba990]

From : https://twitter.com/...930051166208000

NY State Supreme Court reinstates all fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay, says the state violated rights,
acted arbitrary & capricious, notes:“Being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting Covid-19.”
https://iapps.courts...2bbe2602301fc36

Things rebalancing hopefully

[Mind]

It is a growing tsunami of doctors and epidemiologists recommending against the COVID injections for younger people. This expert was once for injecting everyone all the time, now recommends against the practice, saying it is negligent to continue recommending the COVID injections for healthy adults. I would say criminally negligent.

 

Another MIT professor is sounding the alarm about the COVID injections as well.

 

Even Professor Bridle says there is at best - no benefit - in getting the COVID injections for most people.

 

About the only country-level organizations in the world that continue to push for COVID injection for everyone all the time - EVEN TODDLERS, are the CDC and the FDA. Even the UK is no longer recommending the COVID injections for heathy people under 50. If the COVID injections were 100% safe and effective - there would be NO reason, ABSOLUTELY ZERO reason, to recommend against COVID injections. This is the UK's way of saying the negatives outweigh the positives, without admitting their mistake.

 

A New Zealand study has found a 60% increase in kidney disease after the COVID injection roll-out.

 

The massive drop in birth rates in the most-injected countries is also tightly temporally correlated with the roll-out of the injections.

 

A recent survey (peer-reviewed), suggests that around 290,000 deaths were caused by the COVID injections in the U.S. alone. This is actually a low estimate when compared to the V-safe data released from the CDC,v VAERS, and from many other data sources. Remember the days when 1 death was enough to stop a trial or remove a product from the market? That was before the FDA became a wholly-owned subsidiary of big pharma.

 

 

[zorba990]

Dr. Drew, once a mRNA pusher gets halfway there :
https://twitter.com/...082647746867202

Now all he needs to do is preface "spike protein" with "artificial spike protein" (the one with pseudouridine and other modifications).
So close but still room for denial of this sad state of affairs. Sigh. Better than nothing.

[zorba990]

This seems potentially worse than the non identical, fortified, pseudo-uridine spike toxin. Interested in opinions on this.

Follow up on DNA contamination of COVID-19 injectable products.

"Take Home Message: The left-over expression vectors used to manufacture the mRNAs are at contamination
levels 100-fold higher than originally proposed and imply trillions of DNA molecules per dose.
This has implications for integration into our genome."

https://jessicar.sub...ontamination-of

"Kevin’s team originally used a technique called RNA-seq to investigate whether or not there was contamination in the Pfizer and Moderna products and found high levels of kanamycin/neomycin/spike-containing expression plasmids - ‘levels that exceeded the EMA specified dsDNA limits for these COVID-19 injectable products in the case of the Pfizer products’. Concerning. Very concerning. But listen to this. As part of the RNA-seq process, an additive called called actinomycin D (like Furious D) is used, and it can function to suppress DNA amplification by suppressing DNA dependent RNA polymerase activity.1 Hmm. So doesn’t that mean that there might be even more DNA than originally thought?

To check this, and to get around the potential problem of actinomycin D activities associated with RNA-seq, they decided use quantitative PCR (qPCR) and gel visualization (eletrophoresis) to get a better idea of just how much DNA contamination they were dealing with. They got rid of the mRNA from the Pfizer and Moderna samples altogether, purified the existing DNA, and used it in follow-up assays. Doing this allowed them to answer questions relating to whether or not the DNA contaminating the samples were circular or linear: ie - replication competent or not, and to assess the ratio of circular to linear DNA contaminants.

The initial sequencing of the mRNA vaccines did not sequence deeply enough to ascertain the completeness of the linearization reaction.

This was a very important issue to address since the knee-jerk reaction to their original findings was that the DNA was linear(ized) and thus not replication competent. So, no problem! But, even if we are looking at linear plasmids (as opposed to circular), and even though the former might not be replication competent (or less than their circular mates), Kevin’s team’s previous estimate of billions of potentially contaminating DNA molecules is still super concerning. Why? Because the linearization reactions are likely not 100% efficient. For example, if the reactions are 99% efficient, there would still potentially be millions of replication competent plasmids present. Can you see the problem?"