Melatonin...is it really a good idea?
whateve214 06 Oct 2006
I ask this because I have trouble getting to sleep most nights, but I don't want to make my problem even worse in the long run.
DukeNukem 06 Oct 2006
http://www.antiaging...t/melatonin.htm
Athanasios 06 Oct 2006
Athanasios 06 Oct 2006
zoolander 06 Oct 2006
Provide the references!! It's so annoying when people who don't really know what they are talking about critisize supplements with goobledegook heresay bullshit! Provide some peer reviewed references!
I totally agree with Duke in that Melatonin is one of the most underrated supplements on the market (period). It's definately in my top 3. I'm currently taking 5mg per night of a timed release formula (Natural Sleep by LEF).
I have been looking into the possible side-effects of long-term melatonin supplementation (eg. receptor downregulation/desensitisation, pineal gland atrophy, endogenous melatonin depletion and so on) for sometime now but have not found any solid, conclusive research that would suggest stopping my current regime.
If you want to have a read of my previous threads about melatonin use the search function
zoolander 07 Oct 2006
To not provide a reference is just plain lazy in my opinion. At least make an effort.
The following is a link where I discussed melatonin
http://www.imminst.o...hl=melatonin&s=
doug123 07 Oct 2006
To not provide a reference is just plain lazy in my opinion. At least make an effort.
Don't take Graeme's comments personally Martin. He's just trying to raise the level of discussion.
kottke 07 Oct 2006
When is the best time to take melatonin? (how many hours before bed)
What about people with semi-immune disorders? (i.e. allergies)
zoolander 07 Oct 2006
Ok, well what about time-released vs regular melatonin?
When is the best time to take melatonin? (how many hours before bed)
What about people with semi-immune disorders? (i.e. allergies)
let's try and answer the original question first
If I took Melatonin most nights out of the week (or even 3), would my body eventually lose its ability to fall asleep for good, on its own?
From what I have read (see above link) it is unlikely. IMHO, the benefits of melatonin far outweight any suggested risks
kottke 07 Oct 2006
Ok, well what about time-released vs regular melatonin?
When is the best time to take melatonin? (how many hours before bed)
What about people with semi-immune disorders? (i.e. allergies)
let's try and answer the original question first
From what I have read (see above link) it is unlikely. IMHO, the benefits of melatonin far outweight any suggested risks
So the answer is its inconclusive leaning towards probably a good idea; stemming from lots of research done by very creditable (and bright i might add) imminst members.
From here we could ask what the exceptions may be and what is the best method of usage such as: Time-Released vs non TR, best time of night to take before onset of sleep, and contradictions.
zoolander 07 Oct 2006
Time-Released vs non TR
The differences are pretty straight forward. Timed release=either released gradually over time or an a timed release (i.e at 0 hours then at 4 hours). So what are the benefits? Well from personal experiance I find that I wake up in the middle of the night. I am not 100% sure why this may occur. If I take timed release it keeps me asleep. My mother takes non TR and she sleeps well with it. So it comes down to preference and what works better for you I guess
best time of night before onset of sleep
read the label. It is usually anywhere between 15-45 minutes
contraindications
operating machinery.
xanadu 07 Oct 2006
Just my opinion.
whateve214 17 Oct 2006
I am 25 and take 3mg three times a week. It is easily apparent that I get much better sleep. Not only do I get better sleep the days that I take it, but the days in between I get much better sleep as well. In fact, on off days, it feels as if I had taken it. The first week I took it, it felt like I had not had a proper circadian rhythm since I was 9 years old.
I'm 25 too, and it's good to see that you're using it successfully... do you feel that it's lost any of its effectiveness over time? For some reason, I'm still scared of taking it A) for fear that I'm too young and B) my body will stop creating enough of its own and I'm almost better off using Ambien as needed until that stops working. But hopefully they're just irrational fears.
Athanasios 17 Oct 2006
For me, melatonin knocks me out like the first day I have taken it. I sometimes get labeled lame for being tired the next day at the same time I took it the night before. I can fight it, but it is a fight.
meatwad 22 Oct 2006
syr_ 22 Oct 2006
I tried to meet zoolanders challenges, by finding reference that melatonin would be bad for us youngins, but I did not find it.
But since the natural levels are still high under 30 there is no reason to take it, period.
Athanasios 22 Oct 2006
From http://www.benbest.c.../melatonin.html
zoolander 22 Oct 2006
So Syr, going from the above graph it seems that your bold statement is not exactly accurate
syr_ 22 Oct 2006
If the graph abore is true, I would start using it at 21.
Athanasios 22 Oct 2006
syr_ 23 Oct 2006
Anyway, my opinion about melatonin is the same, I would consider only as a part of HRT, not as sleep aid (unless taken very very occasionally). And before starting HRT testing accurately your baseline is fundamental.
nicholandrew 25 Nov 2006
Removed commercial links. -Funk
Edited by FunkOdyssey, 08 January 2007 - 03:01 PM.
Athanasios 25 Nov 2006
The concern presented by others is if supplementing with melatonin will reduce the amount of melatonin your body normally makes. If it did, supplementing would not be the good idea it seems after all.
maestro949 25 Nov 2006
My main concern is that the body may be down-regulating melatonin for a specific reason. Artificially adjusting melatonin (or any other hormone) without adjusting other related parameters could easily cause just as much harm as good in the long-term. The notion of restoring hormone levels to a youthful level of expression is indeed attactive but it ends up being a game of playing with dials hoping to get the optimal settings for all. Get one wrong and oops! The problem is that there are 1000s of dials and getting them all "right" would take several generations of long-term trials.
There are quite a few people taking melatonin so it's apparently safe for short-term usage but the long-term affects will remain unknown and taking it effectively becomes a trial of sorts. It would be great if we could somehow collectively gather this data without costly double-blind clinical trials. If nothing else, future generations can learn from us tinkering with our endocrine systems and metabolic pathways.
zoolander 25 Nov 2006
The concern presented by others is if supplementing with melatonin will reduce the amount of melatonin your body normally makes. If it did, supplementing would not be the good idea it seems after all.
That's one angle and I cannot find any published evidence that supports the above.
Another possibility that has been put forward is that supplementation with melatonin may lead to a downregulation/desensitization of melatonin receptors over time thus reducing the effects of both endogenous and exogenous melatonin.
The only thing that I have found that may support this argument is
FASEB J. 2004 Nov;18(14):1646-56.
Melatonin desensitizes endogenous MT2 melatonin receptors in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: relevance for defining the periods of sensitivity of the mammalian circadian clock to melatonin.
* Gerdin MJ,
* Masana MI,
* Rivera-Bermudez MA,
* Hudson RL,
* Earnest DJ,
* Gillette MU,
* Dubocovich ML.
Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611-3008, USA.
The hormone melatonin phase shifts circadian rhythms generated by the mammalian biological clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, through activation of G protein-coupled MT2 melatonin receptors. This study demonstrated that pretreatment with physiological concentrations of melatonin (30-300 pM or 7-70 pg/mL) decreased the number of hMT2 melatonin receptors heterologously expressed in mammalian cells in a time and concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, hMT2-GFP melatonin receptors heterologously expressed in immortalized SCN2.2 cells or in non-neuronal mammalian cells were internalized upon pretreatment with both physiological (300 pM or 70 pg/mL) and supraphysiological (10 nM or 2.3 ng/mL) concentrations of melatonin. The decrease in MT2 melatonin receptor number induced by melatonin (300 pM for 1 h) was reversible and reached almost full recovery after 8 h; however, after treatment with 10 nM melatonin full recovery was not attained even after 24 h. This recovery process was partially protein synthesis dependent. Furthermore, exposure to physiological concentrations of melatonin (300 pM) for a time mimicking the nocturnal surge (8 h) desensitized functional responses mediated through melatonin activation of endogenous MT2 receptors, i.e., stimulation of protein kinase C (PKC) in immortalized SCN2.2 cells and phase shifts of circadian rhythms of neuronal firing in the rat SCN brain slice. We conclude that in vivo the nightly secretion of melatonin desensitizes endogenous MT2 melatonin receptors in the mammalian SCN thereby providing a temporally integrated profile of sensitivity of the mammalian biological clock to a melatonin signal.
PMID: 15522910 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Note that they refer to in vivo endogenous i.e. your own, nightly secretion of melatonin desensitizing MT2 melatonin receptors and not melatonin supplementation
For me the evidence regarding the benefits of melatonin as an potent anti-aging/anti-carcinogenic supplement far outweighs what seems to be only a suggested risk of desenstizing your own sleep-wake cycles.
I'm 35 years old and take 5mg each night.
maestro949 25 Nov 2006
Light, melatonin and aging
Russel J. Reiter
Department of Cellular and Structural Biology; University of Texas Health Science Center, San
Antonio, TX, USA; E -mail: reiter@uthscsa.edu
The suppressive effect of light on the synthesis and secretion of melatonin from the pineal gland is
well documented. The mechanisms of light suppression involve retinal photopigment activation,
inhibition of the electrical activity of the biological clock (the suprachiasmatic nuclei or SCN) and
reduced neural activity in the cephalic division of the peripheral sympathetic nervous system. This
leads to the diminished release of norepinephrine from postganglionic neurons that end in the
vicinity of the melatonin-producing cells in the pineal gland. As a consequence, the enzymes that
mediate darkness-induced stimulation of melatonin production are shut down and the levels of
melatonin in the blood are diminished. Imposition of light, when sufficiently intense and of the
proper wavelength, during darkness even if of very short duration, suppresses the production of
melatonin. Melatonin levels also are diminished in the elderly due to destruction of ? -adrenergic
receptors on the pinealocyte membranes and a result of an attenuated neural message from the SCN
as a consequence of destruction of the neurons in this nuclear group. One factor which significantly
reduces the degenerative signs of aging in old animals, i.e., food restriction, also curtails the loss of
endogenous melatonin production. A number of studies have suggested that the loss of melatonin
may be consequential in the processes of aging or in the frequency/severity of age-related diseases.
Thus, melatonin has been used, primarily in experimental animals but also in some human studies, to
reduce the onset and progression of neuronal loss and the behavioral consequences of tissue
destruction. Furthermore, the primary theory of aging implicates free radicals as a major cause of
molecular damage in the aged. Antioxidants, such as melatonin, prevent free radical-mediated
damage and preserve tissue integrity and function. Any factor that suppresses endogenous melatonin synthesis may be consequential in terms of the aging process. Thus, the loss of melatonin due to light exposure may contribute to free radical-induced mitochondrial damage, reduced ATP production, and organ deterioration. Indeed, supplementing mice during the latter half of their life with physiological levels of melatonin, maintains more optimal mitochondrial physiology and reduces oxidative damage, both of which could be significant in deferring processes of aging. Light exposure during the normal dark period inhibits melatonin production and the loss of this antioxidant may be consequential free radical-mediated, age-associated diseases.
Source