What I would like to emphasize again is that I, on an individual level, would need to make my own choices, even the choice to expose myself to bad driving habits or challenging road configurations.
But is it really worth the risk? To me, life is too valuable to risk unnecessarily. The law of God I mentioned at the beginning of the thread does permit individual choices to be made. You can choose to obey the law and either reduce or eliminate the risk of harm or disobey it and increase the risk of harm.
The pictures are meant to emphasize that there is a fun and challenging side to every risk as well, which is forgotten if you decide to discuss these issues at a meta-level.
The fun or thrill experienced when engaging in risky behaviors is a psychological condition of mind that can be modified. Humans can learn to be happy engaging in behaviors that do not entail serious risks.
No central authority has the right to limit any kind of individual choices.
If you're talking about human government administering man made laws, I must wholeheartedly agree with you. History shows how badly government by man over man has mismanaged affairs horribly. We need a system much different from anything in the past to be successful.
But it is the way this central guidance is implemented that is my great concern. It should be biased towards education instead of limitation, since education is the only way to strengthen the "weak". And this is exactly the error made by most central guided religious organisations. To impose their way of life and dealing with risks to all people, regardless the individual choices these people would have taken themselves. As if we are not capable of taking these decisions ourselves. Central banning or limiting of human behavioural aspects is not the way to go. This will have the net effect of additional weakening of the "weak" instead of providing an environment where individual growth is enabled.
I wholeheartedly agree with you again. The right type of education starting in early childhood should do it. The strengthening of the weak is important to God. Notice how He condemned the rulers (shepherds) over Israel for, inter alia, failing to strengthen the weak.
Ezekiel 34:1-4.
And as a side-note, I don't think there are intrinsic weak individuals. There is difference in IQ, EQ and whatever other measurements are invented to fulfill the statistical modeling needs of humanity. People are encouraged to stay or even become "weak" due to the wrong type of central guided interventions.
You're always going to have this problem whenever you have hierarchical forms of government. This is why I'm for communal living where all things are shared. The weak can be strengthened under these conditions much better.