Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.
The Futurologist In The Nehru Jacket
#31
Posted 12 October 2002 - 04:34 AM
#32
Posted 12 October 2002 - 04:36 AM
#33
Posted 12 October 2002 - 04:37 AM
sponsored ad
#34
Posted 12 October 2002 - 04:39 AM
“I was just straightening his collar and he collapsed.”
I think the only thing that keeps most people from randomly killing other citizens is the bloody mess it makes and the high likelihood of getting caught. With the Vulcan Death Grip, it would be clean and virtually undetectable. Everybody would be killing people left and right. You wouldn’t be able to have a decent conversation at the office over the sound of dead co-workers hitting the carpet. The most common sounds in corporate America would be, “I’m sorry I couldn’t give you a bigger raise, but... end”
And that’s why the future won’t be like Star Trek.
#35
Posted 12 October 2002 - 01:24 PM
#36
Posted 12 October 2002 - 01:26 PM
that help workers goof off and still get paid.
Naturally, most of the new goofing off technology will be disguised as productivity tools, just as the current ones are. Employees today goof off with the telephone, e-mail, Internet connections, and their computers. It all looks like work to the unsuspecting employer.
#37
Posted 12 October 2002 - 01:29 PM
I want transmitters in my clothes to tell my house what room I’m in at all times. I will walk from room to room like Moses parting the Red Sea, the lighting and temperature adjusting to suit my personal preferences. The people who are already in those rooms won’t like it one bit, but Fm sure Moses had his critics, too. You can’t let the opinions of other people get to you.
I want my clothes to have a fake Batman-like muscular torso and head coven. That way I’ll look more like a superhero.
And I want a cellular phone built into the head cover so I have yet another way to insult gullible Induhviduals to their faces without fear of retribution.
Me: You’re the most gullible imbecile I’ve ever met.
Induhvidual: What did you call me?
Me: Shhh! I’m on the phone.
Induhvidual: Oh, sorry.
#38
Posted 12 October 2002 - 01:31 PM
#39
Posted 12 October 2002 - 01:34 PM
from communicating with us.
The Bozo Filter would be software that checks incoming e-mail and weeds out the ones that are worthless. The worthless ones always have tell-tale signs. The filter would easily find them.
For example, when I get an e-mail message that has fifty other addressees and the phrase “I thought you might be interested in this,” I want my software to delete that message immediately. And I want the originator of that message to be added to my list of people who are forever banned from my electronic kingdom.
#40
Posted 12 October 2002 - 01:35 PM
many of us will be delighted about it
I love computers. To me, computers are like tangerines, in the sense that I can’t make a good analogy about either one of them right now. But if I could, it would involve a clever point about how computers are fun even though they create a lot of work.
#41
Posted 12 October 2002 - 02:36 PM
stupidity into clean fuel.
Scientists will eventually stop flailing around with solar power and focus their efforts on harnessing the only truly unlimited source of energy on the planet: stupidity.
The challenge will be in figuring out how to control this bountiful resource. I predict that the energy companies will place huge hamster wheels outside of convenience stores and offer free lottery tickets to people who spend five minutes running in them. The hamster wheels will be connected to power generators. This plan will produce an unlimited supply of cheap power.
#42
Posted 12 October 2002 - 02:39 PM
All that’s needed to harness this wind is a critical mass of people and a controversial topic. I predict you’ll see windmills near Macintosh-user group meetings.
#43
Posted 12 October 2002 - 02:42 PM
But it’s not a perfect world, and fish don’t own all the technology. Humans do. That’s bad, because technology magnifies the ability of one person to have a big impact on other people. If that doesn’t scare you, then the next time you see professional wrestling on television, look at the crowd shots and ask yourself if you’d like those people to have a bigger impact on your life.
There’s no required safety testing for technology. I think that’s because the danger doesn’t seem obvious to the casual observer. That’s what futurists like myself are for-to scare the bejeezus out of you for no useful purpose whatsoever.
Now let me get on with that important work.
#44
Posted 12 October 2002 - 02:44 PM
It’s awfully hard to get naked in front of someone who has just watched Body Shaping on ESPN ... especially if your partner points the remote control at you and starts clicking it desperately. Nobody needs that.
#45
Posted 12 October 2002 - 02:46 PM
#46
Posted 12 October 2002 - 02:49 PM
We all know that big companies make economic decisions about the trade-offs between price and safety. That’s understandable. It only gets scary when you realize that engineers are the ones who are making those calculations. And engineers don’t like people. In my nightmares, just before I wake up screaming, I hear the engineers talking:
Engineer #1: This solution will work, but it will be more dangerous.
Enginee #2: How much more dangerous?
Engineer #1: I figure a thousand people would die. And most of them would be strangers.
Enginee #2: Is there any way we could modify it ... you know, to kill more strangers?
Engineer #1: Wow, you hate strangers, too?
Enginee #2: Who doesn’t? Plus, I figure there’s a good chance that you’d be killed doing the modifications.
#47
Posted 12 October 2002 - 02:52 PM
So one day I’ll find myself in a heated argument with a banking representative in which I try to explain that I really am stupid enough to forget all of my secret codes. I won’t know whether I should make an eloquent argument, thus jeopardizing my claim of stupidity, or a really stupid argument, thus proving that I’m correct about how stupid I am. It will all be terribly confusing and frustrating.
Eventually, I’ll become a pathetic homeless guy, wandering around muttering, “Was it gb7k99 or was it gB7k99. I’m sure the ‘B’ is capitalized!”
#48
Posted 12 October 2002 - 02:54 PM
#49
Posted 12 October 2002 - 02:57 PM
There are people like me . . . and then there are people who can beat the crap out of people like me. The latter have always been bullies. As children, it was their responsibility to administer the wedgies and noogies to all of the other children. This taught the bullies responsibility. They learned to control their power.
Those of us who were on the receiving end of the wedgies and noogies never learned to control our power, because we didn’t have any. Until now. E-mail allows us to lash out at the people we consider stupid while leaving plenty of time to run away if things get out of hand.
#50
Posted 12 October 2002 - 03:00 PM
I think it’s a Darwinian thing. We’re attracted to the people who have the best ability to survive and thrive. In the old days, it was important to be able to run down an antelope and kill it with a single blow to the forehead. But that skill is becoming less important every year.
Now it only matters if you can install your own Ethernet card without having to confess your inadequacies to a disgruntled tech
support person.
It’s obvious that the world has three distinct classes of people, each with its own evolutionary destiny:
1. Knowledgeable computer users who will eventually evolve into godlike non-corporeal beings who rule the Universe.
2. Computer owners who try to “pass” as knowledgeable but secretly use a hand calculator to add totals for their Excel spreadsheets. This group will gravitate toward jobs as high school principals and operators of pet crematoriums. Eventually, they will become extinct.
3. Non-computer users who will eventually grow tails, sit in zoos, and fling dung at tourists.
#51
Posted 12 October 2002 - 03:03 PM
And women prefer men who are good listeners. Computer users are excellent listeners, because they can look at you for long periods of time without saying anything. Granted, early on in a relationship it’s better if the guy actually talks, but men are not deep. We use up all the stories we’ll ever have after six months. If a woman marries a guy who’s in, let’s say, a retail sales career, she’ll get repeat stories starting in the seventh month and lasting forever. But if she marries an engineer, she gets a great listener for the next seventy years.
#52
Posted 12 October 2002 - 03:04 PM
#53
Posted 12 October 2002 - 03:08 PM
If there’s still any doubt in your mind about male computer users being sexier, consider their hair. Male computer users tend to have two kinds of hair:
1. Male pattern baldness-a sign of elevated testosterone.
2. Unkempt jungle hair-the kind you only see on people who have just finished a frenzied bout of lovemaking.
If this were a trial, I think we could reach a verdict on the strong circumstantial evidence alone.
I realize there are a lot of skeptics out there. They’ll delight in pointing out the number of computer users who wear wrist braces, and they’ll suggest it isn’t the repetitive use of the keyboard that causes the problem. That’s okay. Someday those skeptics will be flinging dung at tourists. Then who’s laughing? (Answer to rhetorical question: everybody but the tourists.)
Henry Kissinger said power is the ultimate aphrodisiac. (This was much catchier than his original motto: “Thick glasses are the ultimate aphrodisiac.”) And Bill Clinton once said that knowledge is power. Therefore, logically, according to the government of the United States, knowledge of computers is the ultimate aphrodisiac. You could argue with me but it’s hard to argue with the government. Remember, they run the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, so they must know a thing or two about satisfying women.
#54
Posted 12 October 2002 - 03:12 PM
The popular view is that the strange creatures travel from a distant planet. This assumes three things about these creatures:
1. They are capable of intergalactic travel.
2. They are capable of finding us in the vastness of space.
3. Their stealth technology makes video images of their ships look like grainy pictures of ashtrays and garbage pail lids.
This seems plausible to me, but you must compare this theory to the only logical alternative: The strange creatures live on Earth, but they are hiding most of the time.
Ask yourself this: Is it easier to build a spaceship capable of intergalactic travel or hide behind some trees? I think you can see where I’m heading with this. If not, let me back up and put it all together for you.
You might have noticed that the world is full of people who are much smarter than other people. For example, the average IQ in the general population is 100. If you remove from the sample all of the people reading this post, the average drops to maybe 40 or 45, tops.
#55
Posted 12 October 2002 - 03:15 PM
The “have-nots” won’t spend hours a day trying to keep their stuff working. They’ll be sitting on the porch sipping lemonade and whittling little animals to give away as gifts. Meanwhile, I’ll be trying to figure out why I can’t get five peripherals to work on my SCSI chain. And I’ll be doing it in the dark.
We techno-buried people will envy the rocking chairs of the simple people. We’ll thirst for their lemonade. And we’ll hate the little carved animals they keep giving us on special occasions (although I won’t mind them too much if I can burn them for heat and light).
#56
Posted 12 October 2002 - 03:26 PM
In the future, scientists will create a powerful and legal aphrodisiac. I base this prediction on the fact that most scientists are horny, hetero-sexual men. What do you think they’re working on?
#57
Posted 12 October 2002 - 03:36 PM
The scientists will be clever enough to disguise their discovery so it can be approved by the FDA and become widely available. I predict that the new aphrodisiac will be marketed as an antidepressant. That’s not too much of a stretch, because it’s difficult to be horny and sad at the same time.
The beauty of calling the aphrodisiac drug an antidepressant is that anyone can act depressed, thus qualifying for the drug. It’s not as if your doctor is going to tickle you to see if you’re lying. And if she does, you might want to see if her diploma is signed.
The warning on the antidepressant drug’s label will say something like, “Might cause amazingly high levels of arousal. Avoid alcohol, vacuum cleaners, and farm animals.”
No other marketing will be necessary. Unfortunately, new sexually transmitted diseases will keep springing up every year. We’ll have a population of incredibly horny people who are afraid to have sex with one another.
The solution is virtual reality.
#58
Posted 22 October 2002 - 03:14 AM
#59
Posted 22 October 2002 - 03:15 AM
You can also watch sports from all over the country, with the exception of your local teams, which are blacked out. This is handy if you’re traveling, but only if you’re willing to take your dish with you and install it in your hotel room. That’s the only way you’re going to see your favorite team, no matter where you are.
You can’t beat the picture clarity on a satellite system. It won’t help you with any of the network television shows, because you can’t get those on the dish, for some legal reason, unless you live in the wilderness. But you can watch the Howard Stern radio show on F! channel. I think it’s important to have full digital clarity when you’re watching a radio show I already forget how I lived without it.
#60
Posted 22 October 2002 - 03:21 AM
males. You might notice a pattern in these technical developments.
Historically, the true purpose of every invention is disguised.
Fire
Seduce women
Stay warm while seducing women
Printing press
Print Bibles in order to
impress women
Virtual reality
REAL PURPOSE
Go on dates with women
Look at women who are prettier than the ones in your house
Watch other people seduce women
Imagine what it’s like to seduce women
Women are largely oblivious to this scientific motivation, and that’s probably a good thing. It gives women more time to run the world.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users