• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

Is anybody here for Obama?


  • Please log in to reply
312 replies to this topic

#241 modelcadet

  • Guest
  • 443 posts
  • 7

Posted 06 March 2008 - 05:12 AM

and blacks who are voting race, which is only too human.


Most Hillary supporters I've come across are women. I ask them a simple question about her policies and they're clueless. Voting gender, which is only too human.


And most Obama supporters are niggers, or nigger lovers, or whiggers.


Ok, wow. I know you're being sarcastic. But if I get squelched on this board for much less, you should probably tone it down, dude. Talking like this and about assassination?!

Chill the fuck out. If for no other reason than that you're identity is easily traceable: http://www.google.co...amp;btnG=Search

I imagine you wouldn't want to speak this way at a job interview or in front of one of your professors. You'd rather strive to speak intelligently. Experiment with doing so here. You might actually find it more rewarding than your ceaseless trolling.

(yes, yes, I know, don't feed the trolls)

#242 missminni

  • Guest
  • 1,857 posts
  • 27
  • Location:NYC

Posted 06 March 2008 - 10:39 AM

Missminni, when they made biknut, they threw away the mold.

Suddenly biknut sounds like the voice of reason. Since I get email notices when comments are made in threads I've subscribed to I got to see the frightening ignorant racist remarks made by gashinshotan (a mold that should have never been cast)
that you since have wisely removed.
If that ever came to the attention of the Secret Service, he just might find himself under arrest.
I'm curious...does he live this country?



#243 william7

  • Guest
  • 1,779 posts
  • 17
  • Location:US

Posted 06 March 2008 - 11:42 AM

Chill the fuck out. If for no other reason than that you're identity is easily traceable: http://www.google.co...amp;btnG=Search

You mean they could find his address where he's living? How can they do that?

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#244 missminni

  • Guest
  • 1,857 posts
  • 27
  • Location:NYC

Posted 06 March 2008 - 02:30 PM

Chill the fuck out. If for no other reason than that you're identity is easily traceable: http://www.google.co...amp;btnG=Search

You mean they could find his address where he's living? How can they do that?

There are many ways that can be done. Often one can be found by a people search or by using
one of the online detective services. Law enforcement will often do it via your IP. If they get
a search warrant, they can find out your home or billing address from your service provider. Making threats on the internet is
very foolish. It is not anonymous. In fact it is your digital fingerprint.


#245 eternaltraveler

  • Guest, Guardian
  • 6,471 posts
  • 155
  • Location:Silicon Valley, CA

Posted 06 March 2008 - 02:43 PM

You mean they could find his address where he's living? How can they do that?


we'd be happy to provide any authorized investigating authority with his IP address, and all data relating to his account. With that it's a simple matter to find out where someone really lives, and who they really are.

imminst is not a haven for would be terrorists and assassins.

#246

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 06 March 2008 - 04:05 PM

And most Obama supporters are niggers, or nigger lovers, or whiggers.

A person who calls himself 'gashinshotan' is capable of more. You will never overcome if you can't adopt a shrewder mindset. Consider this constructive criticism.

#247 biknut

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 06 March 2008 - 04:08 PM

This is quite possible based on what I heard yesterday in the news. They said Obama carried North Texas and Clinton carried South Texas. I was thinking that would mean more delegates for Obama. It's kind of like gerry mandering, and Texas is famous for it. North Texas is more densely populated but South Texas is bigger in area but less densely popluated.

"The Obama campaign said Sen. Obama emerged from Texas's unique primary-and-caucus system with at least five more delegates than Sen. Clinton, even though she won the popular vote. That anomaly reflects the party's rules for allocating delegates proportionate to the candidates' votes in certain districts.

The fact that Tuesday's four-state, 370-delegate sweepstakes effectively yielded a draw underscored how difficult it will be for Sen. Clinton to catch Sen. Obama with just over 600 more pledged delegates to be won. That's why the biggest remaining contest is for superdelegates -- or automatic delegates, as the Clinton camp calls them."

http://online.wsj.co...3.html?mod=blog

#248 dannov

  • Guest
  • 317 posts
  • -1

Posted 06 March 2008 - 05:21 PM

You people that think popular vote wins matter don't understand the delegate process very well. Don't listen to mainstream media, hell, McCain doesn't even come close to having the nomination yet despite what they tell you.

As for the "old days" pre-corporation involvement, that was the pre-Nixon era Niner, and the modern era for doctors that don't sell out to accepting Medicare so that the government has a say in how they conduct their practices. Ron Paul is one such doctor as an OB-Gyn who has delivered 4000+ babies, many for free since the couples couldn't afford it, and he refused to accept a dime from any government program. There are other doctors around like this as well.

Barack Obama is nothing but a cult of personality disguising a communist agenda. He wants to enact a "Global Poverty Act" that would have us donate even billions more out of our country to other countries while we have the world's greatest debt of any country. He wants to build schools in Africa while children in our inner cities suffer from horrendous education. He is also more than willing to go to war with Pakistan, and gosh knows what else.

Hillary's agenda is virtually identical, including her labeling Iran's army as a terrorist organization as an excuse to go to war with Iran in the name of Israel. She's heartless and contrived, and I've never seen someone so naturally devoid of emotion. Her attempts at forcing tears out and faking sadness were "B" grade acting at best, and that's being generous. Neither one of these candidates know or care to know about economics, nor have they once acknowledged how they're going to pay for their healthcare plans when our country is not only bankrupt, but tens of trillions of dollars in debt. Oh ya, they'll just borrow more money or print it out of thin air and destroy the middle class even further.

#249 biknut

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 06 March 2008 - 05:57 PM

Barack Obama is nothing but a cult of personality disguising a communist agenda. He wants to enact a "Global Poverty Act" that would have us donate even billions more out of our country to other countries while we have the world's greatest debt of any country. He wants to build schools in Africa while children in our inner cities suffer from horrendous education. He is also more than willing to go to war with Pakistan, and gosh knows what else.

Hillary's agenda is virtually identical, including her labeling Iran's army as a terrorist organization as an excuse to go to war with Iran in the name of Israel. She's heartless and contrived, and I've never seen someone so naturally devoid of emotion. Her attempts at forcing tears out and faking sadness were "B" grade acting at best, and that's being generous. Neither one of these candidates know or care to know about economics, nor have they once acknowledged how they're going to pay for their healthcare plans when our country is not only bankrupt, but tens of trillions of dollars in debt. Oh ya, they'll just borrow more money or print it out of thin air and destroy the middle class even further.


The only exception I would take with this description is that it doesn't stop with Obama or Clinton, it pretty much nails the entire modern Democrat party. This is why they seldom tell you what they stand for, especially but not limited to Hillary. Most of the Democrats on the street don't realize how communist their leaders are.

#250 missminni

  • Guest
  • 1,857 posts
  • 27
  • Location:NYC

Posted 06 March 2008 - 05:59 PM

responding within your quote in red:

You people that think popular vote wins matter don't understand the delegate process very well. Don't listen to mainstream media, hell, McCain doesn't even come close to having the nomination yet despite what they tell you.

That might be the case as far as delegates go, but evidently he has the backing of the republican party, so the delegate process must be a farce.
Bush publicly endorsed him yesterday as the Republican presidential candidate.


As for the "old days" pre-corporation involvement, that was the pre-Nixon era Niner, and the modern era for doctors that don't sell out to accepting Medicare so that the government has a say in how they conduct their practices. Ron Paul is one such doctor as an OB-Gyn who has delivered 4000+ babies, many for free since the couples couldn't afford it, and he refused to accept a dime from any government program. There are other doctors around like this as well.
Please give us the list. They are few and far between.

Barack Obama is nothing but a cult of personality disguising a communist agenda. He wants to enact a "Global Poverty Act" that would have us donate even billions more out of our country to other countries while we have the world's greatest debt of any country. He wants to build schools in Africa while children in our inner cities suffer from horrendous education. He is also more than willing to go to war with Pakistan, and gosh knows what else.

Hillary's agenda is virtually identical, including her labeling Iran's army as a terrorist organization as an excuse to go to war with Iran in the name of Israel. She's heartless and contrived, and I've never seen someone so naturally devoid of emotion. Her attempts at forcing tears out and faking sadness were "B" grade acting at best, and that's being generous. Neither one of these candidates know or care to know about economics, nor have they once acknowledged how they're going to pay for their healthcare plans when our country is not only bankrupt, but tens of trillions of dollars in debt. Oh ya, they'll just borrow more money or print it out of thin air and destroy the middle class even further.
What economic plan do you see as viable? What do you suggest will get this country out of the economic horror show that
the Republicans got us into. They seem to be emerging unscathed with their pockets nicely lined. In fact, Bush and his "have mores" have more than ever before.


Edited by missminni, 06 March 2008 - 06:00 PM.


#251

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 06 March 2008 - 06:14 PM

Most of the Democrats on the street don't realize how communist their leaders are.

Communism is the logical extreme of the Democratic Party's political platform. Most Democrats recognize that their policies are socialistic; they just don't associate it with that word.

#252 missminni

  • Guest
  • 1,857 posts
  • 27
  • Location:NYC

Posted 06 March 2008 - 08:23 PM

And most Obama supporters are niggers, or nigger lovers, or whiggers.

A person who calls himself 'gashinshotan' is capable of more. You will never overcome if you can't adopt a shrewder mindset. Consider this constructive criticism.

Adopt a shrewder mindset? What disturbing advice. Are you American?

#253 dannov

  • Guest
  • 317 posts
  • -1

Posted 06 March 2008 - 09:14 PM

Missmini, what you see in the white house and congress by and large are not Republicans. Those are corporate fascist neoconservatives that hijacked the party. Ron Paul is a true, traditional Republican. Reagan before the assassination attempt scared him from following through on his ideals was a true Republican. Barry Goldwater, Robert Taft...anti-war, limited government, respect the Constitution. True Republicans are true Americans, faithful to the ideals that our founders built this country upon, and that our country has been driven by the power elite far, far from.

#1 - You reduce the size of government. You get rid of all of the worthless departments such as Dept. of Education and Energy, and replace them with nothing. You allow the states to have many of the powers that the government has usurped from the states over the last century. The more local government is, the more voice and control that the people have.

#2 - You end all foreign military involvement, and strengthen the national borders instead. Policing the world is incredibly expensive and only maintainable due to constant borrowing from China and Japan (at high interest rates mind you).

#3 - With unnecessary big government and military conflicts gone, you end the income tax. The more money that Americans have in their hands, the more that gets invested back into the economy, and the more that it grows. The more that's given to a concentrated few (the government), the higher the likelihood of greed and corruption in the usage of that money. And greed and corruption there be plenty of...

#4 - You legalize gold and silver, as the Constitution MANDATES, to be used as a competing currency. This will force the Federal Reserve to be fiscally responsible, and stop destroying our savings by printing more and more money out of thin air. Do you know what the purpose of the gold standard was by the way? To chain the government down so that it couldn't spend outside of its means by printing money out of thin air, thus protecting the citizens from inflation and fiscal irresponsibility. You can't just print gold and silver out of thin air.

And, it doesn't matter who Bush endorses, nor any other Republican. It's the delegates at the convention that determine the nominee, and if McCain doesn't have 1191 delegates that are committed to vote for him on the first round, then he doesn't have the nomination in the bag. The "backing of the Republican Party" is the farce, the delegate process is how it really works.

As far as a list, you're damned right they're few and far between. That's a direct result of our government and Nixon, and the incredible amount of power that our government has allowed the medical establishment and big pharma to wield over doctors. It takes one heluva doctor of integrity to refuse the funding that comes with going along with big brother, but they're out there. Wish I had this article on this one doc still, read it a few months ago think he had a clinic out in TN.

Edited by dannov, 06 March 2008 - 09:20 PM.


#254

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 06 March 2008 - 09:28 PM

And most Obama supporters are niggers, or nigger lovers, or whiggers.

A person who calls himself 'gashinshotan' is capable of more. You will never overcome if you can't adopt a shrewder mindset. Consider this constructive criticism.

Adopt a shrewder mindset? What disturbing advice. Are you American?

I'm an American, but I was originally Iranian.

#255 biknut

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 06 March 2008 - 09:38 PM

gashinshotan sounds like xanadu.

#256 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 06 March 2008 - 10:44 PM

Most of the Democrats on the street don't realize how communist their leaders are.

Communism is the logical extreme of the Democratic Party's political platform. Most Democrats recognize that their policies are socialistic; they just don't associate it with that word.

And Fascism is the logical extreme of the Rebublican Party's political platform. So what? I would venture that modern day democrats are a lot farther from Communism than modern day republicans are from Fascism. I wish some of you guys would stop living in the past. LBJ has been dead for 40 freakin' years!

#257 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 06 March 2008 - 10:52 PM

Missmini, what you see in the white house and congress by and large are not Republicans. Those are corporate fascist neoconservatives that hijacked the party. Ron Paul is a true, traditional Republican. Reagan before the assassination attempt scared him from following through on his ideals was a true Republican. Barry Goldwater, Robert Taft...anti-war, limited government, respect the Constitution. True Republicans are true Americans, faithful to the ideals that our founders built this country upon, and that our country has been driven by the power elite far, far from.

In other words, for all intents and purposes, true Republicans don't exist. I think it would be more accurate to say true Conservatives, since the GOP was long ago hijacked by radicals. I think that you are mistaken about the lack of foreign interventionist leanings in the people you mention though. One of the many reasons Goldwater had his ass handed to him was his proposal to use nukes in IndoChina. And when was Reagan ever not a warmonger? "The bombing starts in five minutes", remember?

#258 gashinshotan

  • Guest
  • 443 posts
  • -2

Posted 06 March 2008 - 11:02 PM

and blacks who are voting race, which is only too human.


Most Hillary supporters I've come across are women. I ask them a simple question about her policies and they're clueless. Voting gender, which is only too human.


And most Obama supporters are niggers, or nigger lovers, or whiggers.


Ok, wow. I know you're being sarcastic. But if I get squelched on this board for much less, you should probably tone it down, dude. Talking like this and about assassination?!

Chill the fuck out. If for no other reason than that you're identity is easily traceable: http://www.google.co...amp;btnG=Search

I imagine you wouldn't want to speak this way at a job interview or in front of one of your professors. You'd rather strive to speak intelligently. Experiment with doing so here. You might actually find it more rewarding than your ceaseless trolling.

(yes, yes, I know, don't feed the trolls)

I never said I would do it. Is hoping for someones death a crime?

#259 gashinshotan

  • Guest
  • 443 posts
  • -2

Posted 06 March 2008 - 11:03 PM

You mean they could find his address where he's living? How can they do that?


we'd be happy to provide any authorized investigating authority with his IP address, and all data relating to his account. With that it's a simple matter to find out where someone really lives, and who they really are.

imminst is not a haven for would be terrorists and assassins.


And what have I done that's illegal? And in any case, the people Obama is going to hurt the most are the intelligence and military communities.

#260 gashinshotan

  • Guest
  • 443 posts
  • -2

Posted 06 March 2008 - 11:04 PM

Chill the fuck out. If for no other reason than that you're identity is easily traceable: http://www.google.co...amp;btnG=Search

You mean they could find his address where he's living? How can they do that?

There are many ways that can be done. Often one can be found by a people search or by using
one of the online detective services. Law enforcement will often do it via your IP. If they get
a search warrant, they can find out your home or billing address from your service provider. Making threats on the internet is
very foolish. It is not anonymous. In fact it is your digital fingerprint.


Wow so praying for someone's assasination is the same as actually doing it? How retarded is that? What the hell is wrong with people? You want someone dead and they automatically assume you're going to do it.

#261 dannov

  • Guest
  • 317 posts
  • -1

Posted 06 March 2008 - 11:30 PM

You are, unfortunately, right about Goldwater Niner. However, LBJ *did* blow Goldwater's views out of proportion (the infamous "daisy" propaganda ad), and refused to engage him a debate as he knew he'd only stand to lose popularity from it. As for Reagan, it's the platform that he ran on that I'm referring to. The Hinckley and Bush families are very closely connected, and I have no doubt in my mind that it was an attempt by Bush to snatch the presidency (the attempted assassination). From there, I feel that Reagan simply lent lipservice to his platform, while Bush played president behind the scenes similar to Cheney's current role. I could be wrong of course, but the Bush family's corruption goes way back and Bush *was* the head of the CIA for some time. The guy knows how to do people in.

#262 missminni

  • Guest
  • 1,857 posts
  • 27
  • Location:NYC

Posted 07 March 2008 - 12:22 AM

Missmini, what you see in the white house and congress by and large are not Republicans. Those are corporate fascist neoconservatives that hijacked the party. Ron Paul is a true, traditional Republican. Reagan before the assassination attempt scared him from following through on his ideals was a true Republican. Barry Goldwater, Robert Taft...anti-war, limited government, respect the Constitution. True Republicans are true Americans, faithful to the ideals that our founders built this country upon, and that our country has been driven by the power elite far, far from.

#1 - You reduce the size of government. You get rid of all of the worthless departments such as Dept. of Education and Energy, and replace them with nothing. You allow the states to have many of the powers that the government has usurped from the states over the last century. The more local government is, the more voice and control that the people have.

#2 - You end all foreign military involvement, and strengthen the national borders instead. Policing the world is incredibly expensive and only maintainable due to constant borrowing from China and Japan (at high interest rates mind you).

#3 - With unnecessary big government and military conflicts gone, you end the income tax. The more money that Americans have in their hands, the more that gets invested back into the economy, and the more that it grows. The more that's given to a concentrated few (the government), the higher the likelihood of greed and corruption in the usage of that money. And greed and corruption there be plenty of...

#4 - You legalize gold and silver, as the Constitution MANDATES, to be used as a competing currency. This will force the Federal Reserve to be fiscally responsible, and stop destroying our savings by printing more and more money out of thin air. Do you know what the purpose of the gold standard was by the way? To chain the government down so that it couldn't spend outside of its means by printing money out of thin air, thus protecting the citizens from inflation and fiscal irresponsibility. You can't just print gold and silver out of thin air.

And, it doesn't matter who Bush endorses, nor any other Republican. It's the delegates at the convention that determine the nominee, and if McCain doesn't have 1191 delegates that are committed to vote for him on the first round, then he doesn't have the nomination in the bag. The "backing of the Republican Party" is the farce, the delegate process is how it really works.

As far as a list, you're damned right they're few and far between. That's a direct result of our government and Nixon, and the incredible amount of power that our government has allowed the medical establishment and big pharma to wield over doctors. It takes one heluva doctor of integrity to refuse the funding that comes with going along with big brother, but they're out there. Wish I had this article on this one doc still, read it a few months ago think he had a clinic out in TN.


Thanks for your answer. I agree with you about the medical establishment and corporate fascism for sure,but I just don't see us going back to less control when in fact the thrust is for world government. Whether thats good or bad is irrelevant at this point in time. There is no other way to go. Backwards is really not an option.
Einstein saw the importance and necessity of world government because of the atom bomb. The ability to annihilate another nation is not going to go away because we become isolationists and go back to an earlier, friendlier more localized form of government. The issues we have to deal with on a international level have to be dealt with by an international authority and like it or not, the global economy is here to stay.
Although the United Nations is far from perfect, the recognition of the need for an international authority goes back to 1920 and the League of Nations and today that need is even greater. I believe what we've been experiencing throughout the world over the past century is the death throws of nationalism.
I know all the dangers of big government and I too long for less government in my life, but I will achieve that by moving to a rural area and designing my life to be like that. We can do that on an individual basis and make that a lifestyle choice. But as the internet so well illustrates, we are just one big dysfunctional family called the human race, and we must breakdown borders, boundaries and prejudices to work together to save our planet and it's inhabitants from extinction. We can only do that together.
Ultimately, we will have to leave nationalism and racism behind and embrace the earth as one country with one race called the human race. Granted this is a lofty goal and might appear naive on my part to think it possible, but it is no less naive then thinking we can return to a bygone day. There's a Bob Marley song that has the only other option being total destruction. I hope that is not the one we choose.
Check out the real situation:
Nation war against nation.
Where did it all begin?
When will it end?
Well, it seems like: total destruction the only solution,
And there ain't no use: no one can stop them now.


#263 missminni

  • Guest
  • 1,857 posts
  • 27
  • Location:NYC

Posted 07 March 2008 - 12:35 AM

Chill the fuck out. If for no other reason than that you're identity is easily traceable: http://www.google.co...amp;btnG=Search

You mean they could find his address where he's living? How can they do that?

There are many ways that can be done. Often one can be found by a people search or by using
one of the online detective services. Law enforcement will often do it via your IP. If they get
a search warrant, they can find out your home or billing address from your service provider. Making threats on the internet is
very foolish. It is not anonymous. In fact it is your digital fingerprint.


Wow so praying for someone's assasination is the same as actually doing it? How retarded is that? What the hell is wrong with people? You want someone dead and they automatically assume you're going to do it.

I am saying that the internet is not anonymous so one must always keep that in mind when making inflammatory remarks. If in fact you said that about George Bush, you just might have the secret service knocking on your door. They monitor the internet for threats.

#264 gashinshotan

  • Guest
  • 443 posts
  • -2

Posted 07 March 2008 - 12:49 AM

Chill the fuck out. If for no other reason than that you're identity is easily traceable: http://www.google.co...amp;btnG=Search

You mean they could find his address where he's living? How can they do that?

There are many ways that can be done. Often one can be found by a people search or by using
one of the online detective services. Law enforcement will often do it via your IP. If they get
a search warrant, they can find out your home or billing address from your service provider. Making threats on the internet is
very foolish. It is not anonymous. In fact it is your digital fingerprint.


Wow so praying for someone's assasination is the same as actually doing it? How retarded is that? What the hell is wrong with people? You want someone dead and they automatically assume you're going to do it.

I am saying that the internet is not anonymous so one must always keep that in mind when making inflammatory remarks. If in fact you said that about George Bush, you just might have the secret service knocking on your door. They monitor the internet for threats.


I know it's not anonymous and I never make any threats. But then again, since the military-industrial complex and big business hate Obama, I doubt they would even prosecute or stop any attempt if Obama came remotely close to power, on the internet or off.

#265 missminni

  • Guest
  • 1,857 posts
  • 27
  • Location:NYC

Posted 07 March 2008 - 01:21 AM

I know it's not anonymous and I never make any threats. But then again, since the military-industrial complex and big business hate Obama, I doubt they would even prosecute or stop any attempt if Obama came remotely close to power, on the internet or off.

Well you might be right, as they certainly didn't stop Kennedy's assassination, or Kings, or Bobby's. In fact
IMHO they more than likely were behind them.
But "praying for somebody's death" seems like an oxymoron. Do you actually believe in prayer? Is their some god that specializes in answering assassination prayers? Why not pray that he doesn't win? Why do you have to kill him? You are sounding very much like a Muslim fundamentalist.
Kill the infidels! Off with their heads.
As for your own vulnerability on the internet, it is far reaching and can come back to haunt you when you least expect it.
Words you are proud of today might come back to bite you in the butt tomorrow.
For your sake, I hope you outgrow your
anger, hatred and racism. Try praying for that instead of someone's assassination.


#266 gashinshotan

  • Guest
  • 443 posts
  • -2

Posted 07 March 2008 - 01:34 AM

I know it's not anonymous and I never make any threats. But then again, since the military-industrial complex and big business hate Obama, I doubt they would even prosecute or stop any attempt if Obama came remotely close to power, on the internet or off.

Well you might be right, as they certainly didn't stop Kennedy's assassination, or Kings, or Bobby's. In fact
IMHO they more than likely were behind them.
But "praying for somebody's death" seems like an oxymoron. Do you actually believe in prayer? Is their some god that specializes in answering assassination prayers? Why not pray that he doesn't win? Why do you have to kill him? You are sounding very much like a Muslim fundamentalist.
Kill the infidels! Off with their heads.
As for your own vulnerability on the internet, it is far reaching and can come back to haunt you when you least expect it.
Words you are proud of today might come back to bite you in the butt tomorrow.
For your sake, I hope you outgrow your
anger, hatred and racism. Try praying for that instead of someone's assassination.


His death would have profounding effects on American morale. Not only would the people lose hope, they would be instilled with fear and distrust. He is similar to MLK in stirring up dissent and anti-government feelings and his continued existence will legitimize far-left politics which is a far greater threat to America than terrorism. He has openly said he will negotiation with our enemies - what kind of loyalties does he have when he will openly deal with people are who want us dead? His views warrant his death.

#267 biknut

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 07 March 2008 - 02:07 AM

So gashinshotan, I get the feeling you'll not be supporting Obama. What candidate if any do you favor?

#268 aim1

  • Guest
  • 102 posts
  • 8

Posted 07 March 2008 - 02:18 AM

Missmini, what you see in the white house and congress by and large are not Republicans. Those are corporate fascist neoconservatives that hijacked the party. Ron Paul is a true, traditional Republican. Reagan before the assassination attempt scared him from following through on his ideals was a true Republican. Barry Goldwater, Robert Taft...anti-war, limited government, respect the Constitution. True Republicans are true Americans, faithful to the ideals that our founders built this country upon, and that our country has been driven by the power elite far, far from.

In other words, for all intents and purposes, true Republicans don't exist. I think it would be more accurate to say true Conservatives, since the GOP was long ago hijacked by radicals. I think that you are mistaken about the lack of foreign interventionist leanings in the people you mention though. One of the many reasons Goldwater had his ass handed to him was his proposal to use nukes in IndoChina. And when was Reagan ever not a warmonger? "The bombing starts in five minutes", remember?


Your blind hatred for Republicans/Conservatives makes you look silly. Coming from Philadelphia, a city ruled by democrats for so long, and a city that at times is as dangerous as Baghdad, I am not surprised. Also, if you look at WW1, WW2, Korean conflict and Viet Nam, I think the democrats were in office.

#269 air90

  • Guest, F@H
  • 82 posts
  • 1

Posted 07 March 2008 - 02:26 AM

I'm for Obama only because the first Clinton is a war criminal responsible for the deaths of over a million people and is yet to be tried. A vote for Hillary is a slap in the face to the relatives and the dignity of the dead. And if you don't know what I'm talking about add the corpses up.

Sudan 200,000 dead (mostly children) when the pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum was bombed against CIA advice. It is widely considered a "wag the dog" move by Clinton as he was being investigated for purgery at the time.

Iraq 1,000,000-2,200,000 dead (depending on variables you use) disproportionately children, died as a result of the sanctions. Madeleine Albright was confronted with statistics of half a million children under five having died as a result of the sanctions. She replied "we think the price is worth it".

We could go on to talk about support for massacres in East Timor which killed another 200,000, or the indiscriminate bombings in Kosovo, or the indifference to the Rwandan Genocide ect. But I think a million murder victims is enough to hang a man. If we were to hold ourselves to the standards we hold others, Al Gore, Madeleine Albright, Bill Clinton and many others in the upper echelons of his administration would all be either severing life sentences or be executed for war crimes. Hundreds of international lawyers, Denis Halliday and Noam Chomsky share this view. As a social democrat, the Clinton fetish that is seen on the left is revolting to me. Its similar to that of Ronald Regan on the right. Clinton destroyed the welfare state and was the largest proponent of a free trade system that has destroyed the income of millions in the 3rd world.

Edited by air90, 07 March 2008 - 02:27 AM.


#270 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 07 March 2008 - 02:27 AM

I know it's not anonymous and I never make any threats. But then again, since the military-industrial complex and big business hate Obama, I doubt they would even prosecute or stop any attempt if Obama came remotely close to power, on the internet or off.

Well you might be right, as they certainly didn't stop Kennedy's assassination, or Kings, or Bobby's. In fact
IMHO they more than likely were behind them.
But "praying for somebody's death" seems like an oxymoron. Do you actually believe in prayer? Is their some god that specializes in answering assassination prayers? Why not pray that he doesn't win? Why do you have to kill him? You are sounding very much like a Muslim fundamentalist.
Kill the infidels! Off with their heads.
As for your own vulnerability on the internet, it is far reaching and can come back to haunt you when you least expect it.
Words you are proud of today might come back to bite you in the butt tomorrow.
For your sake, I hope you outgrow your
anger, hatred and racism. Try praying for that instead of someone's assassination.


His death would have profounding effects on American morale. Not only would the people lose hope, they would be instilled with fear and distrust. He is similar to MLK in stirring up dissent and anti-government feelings and his continued existence will legitimize far-left politics which is a far greater threat to America than terrorism. He has openly said he will negotiation with our enemies - what kind of loyalties does he have when he will openly deal with people are who want us dead? His views warrant his death.

Gashinshotan, first of all, this is so wrong as to be ludicrous. Second, Sen. Obama already has a security detail that is near to that of a sitting president. Finally, statements like this may very well be taken seriously by any number of federal, state, and local agencies. Please don't talk like this around here.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users