• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

Are Godly ethics pro or anti Immortalism?


  • Please log in to reply
74 replies to this topic

Poll: Are the Ten Commandments evil? (22 member(s) have cast votes)

Are the Ten Commandments evil?

  1. We're all bettter off supporting God's Ten Commandments. (6 votes [46.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.15%

  2. We're all better off suppressing God's Ten Commandments. (7 votes [53.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.85%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#61 thefirstimmortal

  • Life Member The First Immortal
  • 6,912 posts
  • 31

Posted 17 November 2003 - 04:54 AM

Hey Bush,
I spent a little time with your Bible. Perhaps you could answer a few questions about this book. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. How should I deal with this?

If I had a daughter and I sold my daughter into slavery, as it suggests in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

Lev. 25:44 states that I may buy slaves from the nations that are around us. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans but not Canadians. Can you clarify?

I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states she should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill her myself?

Lev. 20:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I see a little blurry these days. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
Rev.William O'Rights
"Born Again Skeptic"

#62 MichaelAnissimov

  • Guest
  • 905 posts
  • 1
  • Location:San Francisco, CA

Posted 18 November 2003 - 01:19 AM

Vote_for_bush; I don't get "offended" at stuff in the sense of feeling a flood of emotion when I read it, thinking extremely loudly, in exclamation marks, "this person is wrong!", or wanting to retaliate in any way. I don't even get offended by swear words, such as those in the very short post of yours that was deleted, but ImmInst is a swear word-free forum. We don't want to make new posters or casual surfers feel uncomfortable or get the idea that this is a low-quality forum.

Vote_for_bush, as a side note, if you're not interested in attaining an extremely extended lifespan through the agency of technology, then I don't see why you would be especially interested in conversing with us on these forums. If you're interested in saving souls, (as you should be, based on your stated beliefs) then you should be communicating with those people where the cost-benefit ratio is highest in terms of new converts vs. hours of time expended in arguing. ImmInst.org is a very pro-technological, atheistic forum, a poor place to do this. So I get the feeling you're just doing this for the fun of arguing, rather than sincere service for God.

#63 bacopa

  • Validating/Suspended
  • 2,223 posts
  • 159
  • Location:Boston

Posted 18 November 2003 - 01:43 AM

First Immortal you make some excellent points and funny ones too...but could you please use fewer cells? For the love of no God! And Vote for Bush clearly you are not particulary serving the "word of God" by attacking us.

#64 Bruce Klein

  • Guardian Founder
  • 8,794 posts
  • 242
  • Location:United States

Posted 18 November 2003 - 01:47 AM

If I could add a little to Mike's post.. members are encouraged not to swear at each other... as swearing per say is not necessarily to be sanitized.. unless as Mike has alluded, the wording is derogatory and hostile.. rather than constructive.

This is all grey area.. or course.. mainly because ImmInst doesn't yet have a moderation guideline policy in place for leadership.. soon to be rectified, however.

#65 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:14 AM

Ah, V4B, didn't Jesus knock the 10 commandmants on the head an replace them with an overall 'rule of thumb', that of treat your neighbor as you would have them treat you? Perhaps I have misread...

David

#66 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:23 AM

As for the other questions, these laws (stoning, killing, slavery) were repealed when Jesus came out and said his bit. V4B, there is even a word in your bible for the process of repealing these laws, something to do with them having been "used up". I'm sure you will be able to find it.

I am the little agnostic source of info, arn't I? See what suday school did to me?

David

#67 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:29 AM

You think God can be summed up with due respect?

Sorry buddy, you got me there, I use christianity as a base for my conduct and behaviour, I'm not even sure about the existance of your god. See "agnostic". Can't sum up something you aint sure about.

And in my defence, just in case there is a god, the omnipotent nature of the one you believe you serve suggests I feel and think this way because he/she has decided I should. Who knows, perhaps I have been sent as a test of your faith? Am I doing a good job by the way? Or are you unwavering in your beliefs? If so, good on you! Power to the bushy fella!

Dave

#68 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:30 AM

That's the one!

Dave

#69 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:35 AM

I'm not sure I follow, I am a heathen non American after all...

#70 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:37 AM

Mate, you gotta not go back changing your posts afterwards if you want me to keep track of what is going on.

#71 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:44 AM

No, I don't think anybody should commit suicide. My problem with rules overall is that people, as you say, look for ways to corrupt them. Like, instead of not killing people, dropping large metal containers full of explosives on them in the name of something or another.

It would probably be a better strategy to invite anybody who wants to leave a country (because of the state of that country) to live with you. It's hard to be a despot if everybody has left...

You used the strategy on the USSR, if I remember, lots of them took you up on the offer, and the country collapsed, if I remember rightly.

Be nice to people, eventually they'll be nice back. That's what turn the other cheek means, me thinks.

Dave.

#72 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:47 AM

Hmm, that sounds like a fairly sweeping commnent on Democrats. Which side of politics is that, left or right? Our democrats (a fairly minor party) are fairly flexable and vote with which ever party best fits their agenda.

So do you prefer the practicing Jews or the non practicing kind? And do you want to convert them to christianity?

#73 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:48 AM

I sponsor a child in Palestine, by the way. Poor little bugger needs to be sponsored on account of the wall between his home and his fathers place of work.

Dave

#74 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 19 November 2003 - 05:55 AM

You changed another one, you bad boy you! This insignificant country (Australia) tends to follow you wherever you go, by the way. Unfortunately. Still, if we didn't, I would be a buddist, and speak Japanese, and own a honda and a wide screened TV. Gotta take the good with the bad I spose.

Was I right in my interpretation of the fullfillment of the law?

#75 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 20 November 2003 - 06:10 AM

Well done V4B, extremely good effort. Are you a real minister? (If thgere is such a thing?) I don't mind you disagreeing with me, the fact you have the courage to do so speaks tons on the quality of the democracies we live in.

BTW, the senators who were screaming at Bush in our parliment are the Greens, (Conservation oriented party) They were screaming at your president because we have a couple of citizens in your "prisoner of war camps" who have had their natural rights bypassed, and our Prime minister can't get his tongue out of Georges butt crack long enough to ask they be allowed to speak to legal representation or their families. Good Ole Boy George did say something that impressed me as they were being escorted from the chamber by armed guards, and that was, and I quote, "I love free speech!" For once I agree with him. If only he was an elected official, instead of one who won his office through the courts.... (G'wan, Put em up!)

Killing is bad. Full stop. People are shaped by their environment. Killing breeds killing which breeds more killing. Turning the other cheek however..... 7X7X7 times, you should know that! Or have I got that wrong?

The only way to stop the cycle is for the more poweful in a killing spree cycle to state their intentions to do so, and put up with a little crap until it eventually stops. It isn't easy. The other alternative is for both sides to enter into a task in which they both rely on each other, and in doing the task, identify and understand each others point of view.

We need to respect each other. The reason I can have a conversation with you over the internet is because I respect your right to be different. You in turn respect mine. In fact, I love the fact that you are different, and want to know as much about you and your countrymen and women as I can.

If we, the West, treated our Muslim brothers and sisters the same way, with respect, stopped trying to force our way of life, our television, our art, our pornography, our values, our biases, our acceptance of divorce, our acceptance of loveless sex, our determination to change the way they dress, how much they charge for their oil, and got to know them, cherish them, love them, accept and value them, they might just do the same. It takes a bigger person to open their arms than it does to put up their dukes.

When Jesus went to a new town, he WASHED HIS HOSTS FEET before he did anything else. And when he was asked to leave, he left, and shook the dust from his feet. Its all about service brother, lay down your sword, and pick up the bowl and soap. The cross is a symbol of sacrifice, not something to be rooted out of the ground, sharpened to a point and shoved in the heart of your neighbor. You start doing that you might as well build your own woodpile, hop on and flick the match, 'cos you've missed the point.

True, the USSR did fail for the reasons you mention. Being isolated economically didn't help much either.

My Palestinian sponsorite is one small attempt to make the world a better place. When I finish my degree I will be sponsoring more. In fact, as many as I can afford in my 'great plan of life'. His dad wouldn't be on welfare if the wall wasn't there, by the way. I envite you to do the same, any region you please. One of the things we know does get bought by our offerings is ambulances for the Israeli tanks to squash. Good on you fellas!

Before you go thinking I have a bias here, I worked as a barman in Bondi Beach for a couple of years, and there wasn't a native Israeli I didn't get along with. (Lots of them in Eastern Sydney!) Happy, smiling, friendly and carefree people. I had to teach them how to say please though, they assured me there was no equivalent word in their culture. Perhaps they were having me on, I don't know. The closest is a word they told me one uses when dealing with ones mother. Go figure?

What were you before you became a Baptist? Is Babtisism a Prodestant offshoot?

David.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users