• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
* * * - - 9 votes

The Biggest Issues In The Presidential Election


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1 RighteousReason

  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 01 November 2008 - 03:23 PM


Dick Morris said this ad could defeat Obama


How could we elect this guy? Come on people, this is crazy!

Agreed.

Here are the three biggest issues in this presidential campaign over all the others.

1. Barack Obama's radical relationships... Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Tony Rezko, Raila Odinga, Rasheed Khalidi, Frank Marshall Davis, ACORN, etc, etc, etc, etc, and the rest of Barack Obama's anti-Americanism is the number one issue of this entire presidential campaign.

2. The number two issue of the entire presidential campagin is Barack Obama's socialism/marxism/communism... his very deeply held philosophy of redistribution of wealth, "spreading the wealth around".

Barack Obama had a strong affinity for Marxist ideology, marxist philosophy of government, marxist professors, marxist and communist student groups in college, attended socialist conferences, had close personal relationships with radical communists, subscribes to a marxist theology, and he has spoken his communist/marxist views in public in many instances


2006 (IRS figures):
Percentage of Federal Personal Income Tax Paid

Top 1% of income earners: 39.89%
Bottom 50% of income earners: 2.99%
The bottom 40% of income earners actually paid -3.8% of federal income taxes.

When Barack Obama talks about giving an "income tax credit" to 95% of people, he is talking about redistributing the wealth of "evil rich" people who already pay well more than their "fair share" and giving welfare checks to the bottom 40% of income earners who pay no income tax at all.

This is not a tax plan. It is a welfare plan.

It's NOT a lie!


3. The number three biggest issue of the entire presidential campaign is Barack Obama's extreme weakness on national defense and his anti-military attitude:

-Cut tens of billions in defense spending
-Slow missile defense and research of future combat systems
-Appeasing terrorists and dictators instead of defeating them
-Stating Iran, North Korea, and others are "tiny countries" and "not a threat"
-Accuse our troops of doing nothing but "air raiding villages and killing civilians"
-Being against the succeeding troop surge
-Refusing to criticize Democrat statements that the "surge failed" and the "war is lost"
-Ignoring Biden when he said that "cutting off funding to our troops will lead to thousands of US lives being lost" and voting to do so anyway.
-Saying he couln't find a single expert that thought the surge would work, followed by the surge achieving extraordinary success.
-Being against implementing the "surge" strategy used successfully in Iraq in Afghanistan
-and on, and on, and on...

Edited by Savage, 02 November 2008 - 05:44 PM.


#2 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 01 November 2008 - 03:35 PM

How can anybody support the most inexperienced, most radical, and most liberal member of the US senate for president?

You really have to come out screaming "I am a balls-to-the-wall radical left wing Democrat" to ever seriously consider voting for somebody like this for the highest office in country.

The level of insanity that has been reached in this election is completely unbelievable.

Edited by Savage, 01 November 2008 - 03:54 PM.


#3 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 01 November 2008 - 03:53 PM

Please also read To The Undecided Voter if you haven't already.

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 01 November 2008 - 09:15 PM

Posted Image

#5 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 01 November 2008 - 09:33 PM

hah.

Edited by Savage, 01 November 2008 - 09:34 PM.


#6 luv2increase

  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 01 November 2008 - 09:34 PM

I agree. The polls would be in McCain's favor by a 20 point margin at least, if all the media gave McCain the positive exposure and praised him like a god, and Obama got all the negative exposure and was treating with the least of respect along with his running mate.

Basically, the media has played a huge part in all this mirage. I can't wait when they find out it didn't work on election night (or weeks after).

#7 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 01 November 2008 - 09:40 PM

I agree. The polls would be in McCain's favor by a 20 point margin at least, if all the media gave McCain the positive exposure and praised him like a god, and Obama got all the negative exposure and was treating with the least of respect along with his running mate.

Basically, the media has played a huge part in all this mirage. I can't wait when they find out it didn't work on election night (or weeks after).

Like John McCain pointed out... "It's going to be a LONG night on MSNBC if I pull this off"

#8 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 02 November 2008 - 12:41 AM

Would you deliberately choose to live in this neighborhood?

Posted Image

Didn’t think so.

Well, what about this one?

Posted Image

#9 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 02 November 2008 - 03:39 AM

I'm wondering if anybody can argue that there are bigger issues in this election than character, economy, and national defense.

I'm open to debate here.

#10 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 02 November 2008 - 01:52 PM

Basically, the media has played a huge part in all this mirage.

It really is unbelievable that the entire mainstream media has given Barack Obama a complete pass on all of the biggest issues in the presidential election.

#11 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 03 November 2008 - 02:55 PM

The Republicans

One thing for sure - the Republicans deserve exactly what is happening to them in this election. It's just too bad the rest of the country has to suffer the lion's share of the punishment the Republicans so richly deserve. In 1994 the voters were fed up with Clinton and the Republicans swept to control of both houses of congress, largely on the strength of Newt's Contract with America. Do you remember some of the promises? One that sticks in my mind is their promise to dismantle the Department of Education. Republicans *in 1994* recognized that the quality of American education had been going steadily downhill since this government behemoth was formed. Well, that was then - this is now. The size of the Education Department, as well as the cost, has doubled. Republicans did this, not Democrats.

As a matter of fact, it's not just the Department of Education; it's our entire federal government. Spending has doubled. Size has doubled. All under the Republican watch inside the beltway. Pork barrel spending is completely out of control, and Republicans are behind the wheel. Education and pork spending aside, we have the Medicare prescription benefit, McCain-Feingold, Sarbanes-Oxley, a tepid response to Kelo vs. New London - all elements of a well-deserved Republican drubbing.

Well, he got that part right.

The very next sentence: The problem here is that the cure, that being Barack Obama, might well be much worse of than the disease.

I still simply cannot comprehend how you guys can agree with all of that, and then somehow just blindly ignore the conclusion.

If doubling the size of government, doubling government spending, pork barrel spending out of control, and so on are all the core of the so-called "failed Bush economic policies", what makes you guys think that Barack Obama is going to somehow be the cure to these problems when he has proposed a trillion dollars in new spending, including taxes for the purposes of wealth redistribution- a whole new form of increasing the size, spending, and pork of government on TOP of everything else.

It seems to me that Obama is taking the "failed Bush economic policies" over the top to a whole new extreme!

I have asked about this repeatedly and yet nobody has been able to give me a reasonable, direct response.

#12 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 03 November 2008 - 04:24 PM

Buck it up Savage. The issues you're concirened about are huge issues to everyone except the MSM, and mindless Obots.

This is Blue state Pennsylvania. Nobody is for McCain in Pa. right? Think again, this was even before big coal got dumped on them. Don't make me have to come over there and start slapin ya. lol ;)


#13 luv2increase

  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 03 November 2008 - 06:07 PM

I'm wondering if anybody can argue that there are bigger issues in this election than character, economy, and national defense.

I'm open to debate here.



You didn't get any bites because they know deep within their intellects that there certainly is not. Also, they know Obama fails miserably on all three of the aforementioned!

#14 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 03 November 2008 - 06:13 PM

Buck it up Savage. The issues you're concerned about are huge issues to everyone except the MSM, and mindless Obots.

This is Blue state Pennsylvania. Nobody is for McCain in Pa. right? Think again, this was even before big coal got dumped on them. Don't make me have to come over there and start slapin ya. lol ;)


I'm this will be repeated in Ohio.

Edited by biknut, 03 November 2008 - 06:17 PM.


#15 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 03 November 2008 - 10:39 PM

I'm wondering if anybody can argue that there are bigger issues in this election than character, economy, and national defense.

I'm open to debate here.



You didn't get any bites because they know deep within their intellects that there certainly is not. Also, they know Obama fails miserably on all three of the aforementioned!

Yeah this is just completely insane.

#16 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 03 November 2008 - 10:59 PM

The Republicans

One thing for sure - the Republicans deserve exactly what is happening to them in this election. It's just too bad the rest of the country has to suffer the lion's share of the punishment the Republicans so richly deserve. In 1994 the voters were fed up with Clinton and the Republicans swept to control of both houses of congress, largely on the strength of Newt's Contract with America. Do you remember some of the promises? One that sticks in my mind is their promise to dismantle the Department of Education. Republicans *in 1994* recognized that the quality of American education had been going steadily downhill since this government behemoth was formed. Well, that was then - this is now. The size of the Education Department, as well as the cost, has doubled. Republicans did this, not Democrats.

As a matter of fact, it's not just the Department of Education; it's our entire federal government. Spending has doubled. Size has doubled. All under the Republican watch inside the beltway. Pork barrel spending is completely out of control, and Republicans are behind the wheel. Education and pork spending aside, we have the Medicare prescription benefit, McCain-Feingold, Sarbanes-Oxley, a tepid response to Kelo vs. New London - all elements of a well-deserved Republican drubbing.

Well, he got that part right.

The very next sentence: The problem here is that the cure, that being Barack Obama, might well be much worse of than the disease.

I still simply cannot comprehend how you guys can agree with all of that, and then somehow just blindly ignore the conclusion.

If doubling the size of government, doubling government spending, pork barrel spending out of control, and so on are all the core of the so-called "failed Bush economic policies", what makes you guys think that Barack Obama is going to somehow be the cure to these problems when he has proposed a trillion dollars in new spending, including taxes for the purposes of wealth redistribution- a whole new form of increasing the size, spending, and pork of government on TOP of everything else.

It seems to me that Obama is taking the "failed Bush economic policies" over the top to a whole new extreme!

I have asked about this repeatedly and yet nobody has been able to give me a reasonable, direct response.

This is something I have been asking for weeks and still can't get any answer from any Obama supporter.

Taking into account their total blindness to the biggest issues in this election, it's as if nobody really cares about Obama's philosophy, policies, or any of the real consequences of putting him and the radical left wing Democrats in complete control of our government.

The consequences don't matter at all to the Obama supporters, in my estimation. It's virtually ALL a cult of personality, worship of celebrity, and in many cases outright racism.

Edited by Savage, 03 November 2008 - 11:00 PM.


#17 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 03 November 2008 - 11:07 PM

People hear the word "change" and it is acting as a mental stop sign.

That's all they want to know. They have a vague promise of the government giving them money, a young guy with a nice smile, and there is no reason to move past that mental stop sign -- they are ready to just go out and pull the lever for Obama without further consideration.

Edited by Savage, 03 November 2008 - 11:13 PM.


#18 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 03 November 2008 - 11:14 PM

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."

#19 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:16 AM

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."


This election will decide if we've arrived there or not. My McCain voting customers all feel the exact same. They are living in fear that Obama will be the end America. Genuine fear. Fear is a great motivator. All of them have already voted.

#20 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:17 AM

WHERE DO YOU START?

I chose that opening line rather than "what's the use." Election day is tomorrow, so there's definitely a chance here to prevent perhaps irreparable harm to our Republic ... maybe not a huge chance ... but a chance.

Never in the last 100 years has someone so completely inexperienced and so far to the left been so close to becoming our president. It is beyond imagination that we've come to this.

I really don't have the time before I go on the air to craft (if that's the word) a lengthy narrative on this campaign and the importance of our vote tomorrow ... so we go with bullet points. They don't necessarily flow together all that well ... but each gets a point across that is, I think, important.

Who knows ... maybe someone will read some of these points and tell themselves that they just can't pull the trigger for this dangerous leftist when they get into the voting booth. Others will read this and just have their feelings about how much trouble freedom and economic liberty in this country are in totally reinforced.

-One question about Obama that has never been satisfactorily answered is "What has he ever accomplished?" The best his supporters can come up with is "He was elected to the U.S. Senate." So was John McCain ... several times. Besides, take a look at his election. He had two opponents self-destruct with scandal. The GOP had to go to Maryland and talk Alan Keyes into moving to Illinois to run against Obama. Trust me, that win was no sterling accomplishment.

-Don't argue with me here. You'll lose. There is NO constitutional right to vote in a presidential election. We're going to learn in a few days just how smart our founding fathers were in this regard.

-Obama is a product of the Chicago political machine. Several times during his political career Obama had a chance to either cast a vote or make a statement against the corruption that permeates Chicago's machine. Never – not on one occasion – did he do so.

-The fact is, Obama has benefited from corruption (Tony Rezko?) but has never fought it.

-Do you know how Obama won his first election in Illinois? He had campaign operatives go to the voting office and work hundreds of hours pouring over petitions to have his opponents thrown off the ballot. I guess that means that this is the first real election battle he's ever been in!

-I guess it's just me, but all this time I thought that the government used its power to seize property ... i.e., to tax ... in order to fund the necessary and appropriate functions of government. Now, under Obama, we've learned that one of the appropriate functions of government is to take from those who have and give to those who have not. I prefer a different phraseology: Take from those who achieve, and give to those who achieve not. Karl Marx was of a like mind.

-Obama's "spread the wealth around" mantra means that he believes that we do not leave our homes every morning to work for ourselves and our families. We leave our homes to work for the government. We belong to government, not to ourselves. The government will determine how much of the money we earn we deserve to keep .. the rest goes to people the government believes to be even more deserving of the fruits of our labors.

-Obama's candidacy would have faltered before an educated electorate. Why do you think Democrats love government schools so much? Do you want examples? I've got examples.

-Obama says he's going to give tax cuts to 95% of Americans. Americans don't realize that over 40% of their numbers don't pay income taxes; and since they don't realize that, they aren't asking themselves how Obama can give a tax cut to someone who doesn't pay taxes.

-Obama has effectively change the definition of "tax cut." From now on any government handout to any worker is a tax cut. Changing this definition may well be one of their greatest accomplishments in this election and that new definition will cause us problems for decades.

-Obama constantly rants about those dirty corporations who shipped "our jobs overseas." An educated voter knows that those jobs belong to the employers, not the employees. Workers look for jobs. Employers with jobs look for workers. Pretty simple, really.

-Obama also tells us that 95% of small businesses out there will not have their taxes increased. The only reason this line works is because our government educated voters cannot grasp the idea that it isn't the percentage of small businesses hit with tax increases that counts; it's the percentage of small business employees represented by the unfortunate 5% that counts. Tomorrow thousands of workers – perhaps tens of thousands of workers – employed by what we call "small businesses" will cast a vote that, a year or so down the road, will cost them their jobs.

-Over the weekend Obama promised to bankrupt the coal industry if they tried to build any more coal-fired power plants. Can any of you think of a time when any president has ever made an overt threat to bankrupt a large American industry?

-Obama says that his "cap and trade" policy for controlling greenhouse gas emissions is going to cause electricity prices to "skyrocket." Oops ... there goes some of that middle class "tax cut." Guess he'll have to transfer some more wealth to help his constituents pay the increased price.

-There are literally millions of Obama supporters out there who think that once Obama becomes the president their lives are going to become sweetness, roses and light. One woman at an Obama rally ...

-Remember Obama's 30-minute infomercial? If a foreigner with no knowledge of our country or our people were to see that program they would think that America was a country mired in abject misery and depravation. Thanks, Obama, for the nice positive message.

-How long after the election, whether Obama wins or loses, do you think it will take for that America-hater Jeremiah Wright to surface?

-The top 10% of income earners in this country pay over 70% of all income taxes. The top 1% of income earners earn around 19% of all income, but they pay almost 39% of all income taxes. When these people don't want to give up a larger share of their earnings Obama call's them "selfish."

-When someone is content to sit on their butts and wait for Obama to transfer some wealth from someone else to their pockets they are not "selfish."

-Every one of the points I am bringing up here is "hate speech" to an Obamacon.

-The great Democrat goal is to have more than 50% of the voters living, at least in part, on the efforts of the minority of voters. When we pass that tipping point ... and we're nearly there ... game over.

-In every election since 1952 Democrats have told the voters "vote for the Republicans and they'll take your Social Security away." In every election after 2008 the Democrats will say "Vote for the Republicans and they're going to make you pay taxes." Then if Obama wins again, in every election after 2012 Democrats will say "Vote for the Republicans and they'll make you pay for your own Social Security and Medicare." How long before we hear: "Vote for the Republicans and they'll make you work for a living!"

-Obama will definitely destroy your right to be armed outside of your own home for your own protection. The question is whether we count the time until he accomplishes this in days, weeks, months or years.

-Do you see now why politicians, especially Democrats, aren't fond of the FairTax? Without playing his tax scam and wealth envy card Obama would have been toast by Super Tuesday.

-Surveys in Israel show that 76% of Israeli citizens want McCain to win. American Jews will vote for Obama by pretty much the same percentage. What do Jews in Israel know that Jews in America do not?

-Peter Nicholas is a reporter for the Los Angeles Times. He has been traveling with Obama for almost the entire campaign. Nicholas writes "After all this time with him, I still can't say with certainty who he is." Nicholas doesn't know him, but so many voters are so sure they do.

-Obama wants a national civilian security force that, in his words, is "just as strong as our military." Who would they serve under? What would their mandate be? Would they be unionized? (oh HELL yes!). Would this be like the Soviet Union under Communism where neighbors ratted on neighbors for anti-government statements? And what does he mean "as strong as our military?" Would this national civilian security force have nukes? Tanks? Fighter planes? Are we just talking about a glorified national police? (Show us your papers!)

-Obama has talked about reducing spending on our military. One leading Democrat Senator has suggested a 25% spending cut on defense. Do you feel comfortable with that? You do know that all of the savings would be spent on buying votes, don't you?

-Do you home school your children? Obama has called home schooling a fraud. Put him in office and you'll be putting your kids back in government schools for their indoctrination.

-Do you run a small business? If Obama wins start planning immediately to lower your work force. The best way to do this would be through efficiency measures and temporary staffing agencies. Not only is Obama going to make it easier for your workers to unionize ... he's going to expand onerous measures such as the Family Leave Act. You will end up paying your employees a good portion of their salary to lay out for weeks on end.

-Maybe you shop at Wal-Mart. Get ready for higher prices. Obama's instant unionization bill will surely result in the unionization of Wal-Mart's workforce. In fact, as much as Democrat politicians hate Wal-Mart, it's safe to say that Wal-Mart is target number one. The result? Higher prices for you. If Obama can call a government handout a tax cut, we can call higher prices a tax increase. This will be Obama's tax increase on the poor and the middle class.


--- Boortz


On the difference between "selfish" and "self-centered".

"self-centered" is a word used to represent an important dichotomy between a philosophy that is entrenched in pleasure and a philosophy based on righteousness and achievement.

"selfish" is a word used to bully someone by suggesting they are not sufficiently enslaved by a given social mob.

Edited by Savage, 04 November 2008 - 12:18 AM.


#21 nobama is teror

  • Guest
  • 6 posts
  • 0

Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:35 AM

high 5 savage

#22 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:40 AM

high 5 savage

I'm not really looking for an endorsement from someone with a username like that, but that's your opinion.

Frankly I think you are Ian Empathy using yet ANOTHER stupid cheap little tactic instead of actually engaging in a reasoned debate.

Have fun with this one, too.

#23 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:23 AM

On the difference between "selfish" and "self-centered".

"self-centered" is a word used to represent an important dichotomy between a philosophy that is entrenched in pleasure and a philosophy based on righteousness and achievement.

"selfish" is a word used to bully someone by suggesting they are not sufficiently enslaved by a given social mob.

THE LATEST LINE ... SELFISHNESS

Just days before the election, this is Obama's stump speech ... that John McCain and Sarah Palin have made a virtue out of "selfishness."

He comes up with this line: "John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic ... You know I don't know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness."

So there you go. Now, if you do not want the government to take your wealth and redistribute it to people who don't pay taxes, this makes you a selfish person. On the other hand, if you do not work and you want the government to take money from someone who does and give it to you, you are not selfish. Not even greedy -- whatever that is.

If you want to talk about selfish, why not take a look at statistics which clearly show that "Conservatives those who would most likely not support Obama's spread the wealth mentality" donate more to charity. Even though liberal households tend to have incomes, conservatives households give 30% more to charity than the average liberal household.

And guess what? It didn't take the force of government to do that.

--- Boortz

Edited by Savage, 04 November 2008 - 01:27 AM.


#24 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:31 AM

On Obama's inexperience...

Thomas Sowell compares Barack Obama to a sophomore in an Ivy League college – "very bright and articulate students, utterly untempered by experience in real world."

#25 Connor MacLeod

  • Guest
  • 619 posts
  • 46

Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:41 AM

Would you deliberately choose to live in this neighborhood?

Posted Image

Didn't think so.

Well, what about this one?

Posted Image


Skeletor...that is friggin' hillarious! :)

#26 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 02:00 AM

Read this thread- and vote for John McCain tomorrow!

#27 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:28 AM

Most science funding in the US is privately funded. If Barack Obama continues this insane massive expansion of government that Bush has started, it won't matter how much government science funding he adds, he will do far, far more damage to science than the government can correct from his attacks on the free market.

#28 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:52 AM

Most science funding in the US is privately funded. If Barack Obama continues this insane massive expansion of government that Bush has started, it won't matter how much government science funding he adds, he will do far, far more damage to science than the government can correct from his attacks on the free market.


This is directly related to:

The Republicans

One thing for sure - the Republicans deserve exactly what is happening to them in this election. It's just too bad the rest of the country has to suffer the lion's share of the punishment the Republicans so richly deserve. In 1994 the voters were fed up with Clinton and the Republicans swept to control of both houses of congress, largely on the strength of Newt's Contract with America. Do you remember some of the promises? One that sticks in my mind is their promise to dismantle the Department of Education. Republicans *in 1994* recognized that the quality of American education had been going steadily downhill since this government behemoth was formed. Well, that was then - this is now. The size of the Education Department, as well as the cost, has doubled. Republicans did this, not Democrats.

As a matter of fact, it's not just the Department of Education; it's our entire federal government. Spending has doubled. Size has doubled. All under the Republican watch inside the beltway. Pork barrel spending is completely out of control, and Republicans are behind the wheel. Education and pork spending aside, we have the Medicare prescription benefit, McCain-Feingold, Sarbanes-Oxley, a tepid response to Kelo vs. New London - all elements of a well-deserved Republican drubbing.

Well, he got that part right.

The very next sentence: The problem here is that the cure, that being Barack Obama, might well be much worse of than the disease.

I still simply cannot comprehend how you guys can agree with all of that, and then somehow just blindly ignore the conclusion.

If doubling the size of government, doubling government spending, pork barrel spending out of control, and so on are all the core of the so-called "failed Bush economic policies", what makes you guys think that Barack Obama is going to somehow be the cure to these problems when he has proposed a trillion dollars in new spending, including taxes for the purposes of wealth redistribution- a whole new form of increasing the size, spending, and pork of government on TOP of everything else.

It seems to me that Obama is taking the "failed Bush economic policies" over the top to a whole new extreme!

I have asked about this repeatedly and yet nobody has been able to give me a reasonable, direct response.

This is something I have been asking for weeks and still can't get any answer from any Obama supporter.

Taking into account their total blindness to the biggest issues in this election, it's as if nobody really cares about Obama's philosophy, policies, or any of the real consequences of putting him and the radical left wing Democrats in complete control of our government.

The consequences don't matter at all to the Obama supporters, in my estimation. It's virtually ALL a cult of personality, worship of celebrity, and in many cases outright racism.



#29 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:09 PM

bump

#30 RighteousReason

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 02:12 PM

2006 (IRS figures):
Percentage of Federal Personal Income Tax Paid

Top 1% of income earners: 39.89%
Bottom 50% of income earners: 2.99%
The bottom 40% of income earners actually paid -3.8% of federal income taxes.

When Barack Obama talks about giving an "income tax credit" to 95% of people, he is talking about redistributing the wealth of "evil rich" people who already pay well more than their "fair share" and giving welfare checks to the bottom 40% of income earners who pay no income tax at all.

This is not a tax plan. It is a welfare plan.

It's NOT a lie!

You should also remember that the top 1% only earn 19% of the income in the country.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users