http://www.aftonblad...ticle4209703.ab
This woman is 72 years old, looks 50 and makes 55 push-ups...
I am amazed.
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:09 PM
Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:17 AM
Posted 21 January 2009 - 03:19 AM
Edited by Ben - Aus, 21 January 2009 - 03:23 AM.
Posted 26 January 2009 - 04:19 PM
She definitely is taking some kinds of hormones including testosterone. But if it can make her look like that @ 72...Woah, that has seriously shocked me. No way she is 72.
She does very good dips. She's 72 and she is much, much stronger than I am. I'm not on roids, but still, she's 72 and I'm 25.
Posted 26 January 2009 - 04:31 PM
Posted 26 January 2009 - 06:01 PM
Posted 26 January 2009 - 06:19 PM
Posted 26 January 2009 - 06:25 PM
Posted 26 January 2009 - 06:28 PM
Drugs.
Posted 26 January 2009 - 06:38 PM
Posted 26 January 2009 - 08:38 PM
Edited by marqueemoon, 26 January 2009 - 08:45 PM.
Posted 26 January 2009 - 08:46 PM
if she did something about her facial wrinkles she could possibly pass for late 30s.
Posted 26 January 2009 - 08:57 PM
Posted 26 January 2009 - 09:32 PM
Posted 26 January 2009 - 09:45 PM
Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:14 PM
I agree with Shepard. She must be doing roids or something. The other explanation is that she has some unique genetic difference, like no myostatin blocker, or something.
But hey, I am all for people using whatever means possible to stay healthy, feel good, and live life the way they want to. Go for it girl!
I think if she got some cosmetic surgery she might pass for upper 40s, around 50.
Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:49 PM
Posted 27 January 2009 - 02:24 PM
Posted 08 February 2009 - 12:46 AM
She looks like she is in her later 50's to me, but yeah could look younger with surgery. She very well may be on hormones or steroids, probably someone that speaks the language would have to research that a bit
Edited by Bodhi, 08 February 2009 - 12:48 AM.
Posted 22 March 2009 - 12:31 PM
She looks like she is in her later 50's to me, but yeah could look younger with surgery. She very well may be on hormones or steroids, probably someone that speaks the language would have to research that a bit
My 2 cents.
Steroids are relatively safe, but not very effective. HGH is extremely effective, and makes anabolic steroids a bit more worthwhile, but HGH costs much money.
HGH is anti-aging, anabolic steroids, not so much.
I don't know but I'm sure it is possible to look like that and have that kind of strength without hormones at her age.... but, females are much more sensitive to anabolics, and the guys in the pic, well at least one are obviously using steroids & or HGH & insulin. Insulin and steroids are not really very healthy but they can help you to gain lean muscle mass if you know hoe to use them. HGH works much better in many ways but more subtly for a much higher financial price, but in the net cost/benefit ratio if you want to live a long time HGH would probably be the only one of the three you would want to use, unless you are a make over 40 in which case a weak non aromatizing steroid like primobolan or deca durabolin probably won't hurt you as long as you use them in theraputic doses.....There is no substitute for exercise, exercise alone will work miracles and once you get used to it it's not something that you can't enjoy.....sometimes what appears to be the easiest path is the most difficult when you look back from the end of it...If that makes any sense.
Posted 22 March 2009 - 12:49 PM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 05:28 AM
also think she's on HGH or some kind of roid. the stuff is not safe and not worth the cancer risk.
i'd be more impressed to see her run a marathon (endurance) than squat 260 or do 55 pushups. she looks good, but looks alone can be deceiving and not always representative of fundamental health...
Edited by TianZi, 23 March 2009 - 05:48 AM.
Posted 24 March 2009 - 11:47 PM
For anyone interested in their long-term health, running marathons regularly is a pretty bad idea. Particularly at age 72.
Further, who do you think is more likely to shatter their hip and shoulder if they slip and fall in the shower? This woman, or the typical 72 year old woman?
Posted 25 March 2009 - 12:49 AM
Posted 25 March 2009 - 02:13 AM
who cares if she is protecting her hips/shoulders/bones if she is risking cancer by bulking with a steroid of some kind?
Posted 25 March 2009 - 02:15 AM
the human body was meant to run, not bench press.
Posted 25 March 2009 - 03:08 AM
She looks astonishing for a 72 year old (actually a bit attractive, to be honest).
the human body was meant to run, not bench press.
Actually, the human body has evolved to be able to do lots of things: sprint, walk for tremendous distances, throw, carry odd objects, pick things up, drag heavy things, etc.
Posted 25 March 2009 - 03:22 AM
True, but I'd also make the qualification that evolved characteristics don't necessarily represent optimal solutions. Preexisting organic design imposes contraints which often result in a local maximum. Human bipedalism and our (obviously inadequate) spine is a good example of this.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users