• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

The Bible Commands Us to Raise the Dead


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#31 TianZi

  • Guest
  • 519 posts
  • -0

Posted 04 April 2009 - 11:14 AM

I think the key to not antagonizing religious folks is being more careful in the words we use to describe this movement. If we say our goal is "healthy life extension" rather than "becoming immortal", you'll find few of the religiously devout who'll be offended.

Really, I think the name of this website, and of the organization itself, is a self-inflicted wound.

#32 Guacamolium

  • Guest
  • 747 posts
  • 30
  • Location:Tahoe

Posted 05 April 2009 - 06:43 AM

Immortality is not against christianity. And why should god care if we die of aging rather than in an accident being 1000000 years old :~


Yet christians should behave unlike immortalists... you know, because the greater life is one existence away....

#33 cryofan

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 136 posts
  • 0

Posted 05 April 2009 - 04:25 PM

I think the key to not antagonizing religious folks is being more careful in the words we use to describe this movement. If we say our goal is "healthy life extension" rather than "becoming immortal", you'll find few of the religiously devout who'll be offended.

Really, I think the name of this website, and of the organization itself, is a self-inflicted wound.



I strongly disagree. I am simply using the words of the bible and interpreting them in a very straightforward way. I do not think they will be offended. And I don't really care. If you want converts to cryonics who are christian, I think that worrying about offending is going to be counterproductive. I thinkt that cryonics is supported by the bible, and so every good christian must be a good cryonicist.

#34 klatu

  • Guest
  • 4 posts
  • 0

Posted 08 April 2009 - 07:29 PM

The concept of raising the dead or Resurrection has taken on radical new meaning by a wholly new interpretation of the moral teachings of Christ. Redefining Faith, the Word and the Resurrection, this new interpretation questions the validity and origins of all Christian traditions. As this teaching spreads on the web, a religious, cultural and scientific furore looks imminent.

Using a synthesis of scriptural material from the Old and New Testaments, the Apocrypha , The Dead Sea Scrolls, The Nag Hammadi Library, and some of the worlds great poetry, it describes and teaches a single moral LAW, a single moral principle offering the promise of its own proof; one in which the reality of God responds to an act of perfect faith with a direct, individual intervention into the natural world; correcting human nature by a change in natural law, altering biology, consciousness and human ethical perception beyond all natural evolutionary boundaries. Intended to be understood metaphorically, where 'death' is ignorance and 'Life' is knowledge, this experience, personal encounter and liberation by transcendent power and moral purpose is the 'Resurrection', the justification of faith.

It is often stated that extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence and rightly so. Here then is the first ever viable religious conception capable of leading reason, by faith, to observable consequences which can be tested and judged. This new teaching delivers the first ever religious claim of insight into the human condition, that meets the Enlightenment criteria of verifiable, evidence based truth embodied in action. For the first time in history, a moral tenet exists, offering access by faith, to absolute proof for its belief. In religious terms, revolutionary stuff.

Trials of this new teaching are under way in several countries. Anyone for a shot at immortality should check the link: http://www.energon.org.uk

#35 TianZi

  • Guest
  • 519 posts
  • -0

Posted 09 April 2009 - 07:47 AM

I think the key to not antagonizing religious folks is being more careful in the words we use to describe this movement. If we say our goal is "healthy life extension" rather than "becoming immortal", you'll find few of the religiously devout who'll be offended.

Really, I think the name of this website, and of the organization itself, is a self-inflicted wound.



I strongly disagree. I am simply using the words of the bible and interpreting them in a very straightforward way. I do not think they will be offended. And I don't really care. If you want converts to cryonics who are christian, I think that worrying about offending is going to be counterproductive. I thinkt that cryonics is supported by the bible, and so every good christian must be a good cryonicist.


I was making a larger point that is only tangentially related to cryonics. I personally am not interested in cryonics, as I do not live in a country in which this kind of service is available, and am unconvinced by the science underlying it in any event. I understand why others are keenly interested in it, and so it is unsurprising the organization provides a forum for it. That said, this organization is primarily devoted to the pursuit and advocacy of healthy human life extension, and that is where my interest in ImmInst.org begins and ends. The more time that is spent publicly advocating that goal, and the less time spent talking about "immortality", the better the organization's goal of advocacy will be served.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users