1. "we need to offer those who are willing to make amends a pathway to citizenship"
2. "I strongly support making sure folks who are here legally have access to affordable, quality health insurance under this plan, just like everybody else."
1 + 2 = 3, health care for illegal immigrants.
Is that really "full of shit" or "spin"? Logic is not spin.
Uh, yeah. Won't comment on the "full of shit" or "spin" part, but that argument is not logical. At best the conclusion would be "health care for illegal immigrants if and when their residency is legal" or "health care for previously illegal immigrants who have since made amends" (whatever "making amends" might entail). But then they would no longer be illegal immigrants. I don't see any logical way to draw your conclusion from those premises.
