• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

Longevity Gene, CETP inhibitors and fenofibrate


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 22 November 2010 - 05:40 PM


I recently became aware of the Rs5882(G,G) SNP, sometimes called a longevity gene which is fairly common among Ashkenazic Jews, among whom it was discovered. From SNPedia:

Rs5882(G;G)
This SNP has been related to exceptional long life. A study in Ashkenazi Jews showed that individuals with this genotype have significantly longer lifespans, and better cognitive function [PMID 17190939])

Another study shows that this homozygote has and average 70% lower risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Associated with longer lifespan, 0.28x lower risk of dementia, 0.31x lower risk of Alzheimer's.


Even a single copy of the gene confers protection against dementia, and against heart disease. From Pubmed:

Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2170-5.
A genotype of exceptional longevity is associated with preservation of cognitive function.

Barzilai N, Atzmon G, Derby CA, Bauman JM, Lipton RB.

Institute for Aging Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. barzilai@aecom.yu.edu
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test whether cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) genotype (VV homozygosity for I405V) is associated with preservation of cognitive function in addition to its association with exceptional longevity.

METHODS: We studied Ashkenazi Jews with exceptional longevity (n = 158; age 99.2 +/- 0.3 years) for the associations of CETP VV genotype and lipoprotein phenotype, using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). To confirm the role of CETP in a younger cohort, we studied subjects from the Einstein Aging Study (EAS) for associations between CETP VV and cognitive impairment.

RESULTS: Subjects with MMSE > 25 were twice as likely to have the CETP VV genotype (29% vs 14%, p = 0.02), and those with the VV genotype were more likely (61% vs 30%, p = 0.02) to have MMSE > 25. Subjects with the VV genotype had lower levels of CETP (1.73 +/- 0.11 vs 2.12 +/- 0.10 mug/mL, p = 0.01), higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels (p = 0.02), and larger lipoprotein particles (p = 0.03). In the EAS cohort, an approximately fivefold increase in the VV genotype (21% vs 4%, p = 0.02), higher HDL levels, and larger lipoprotein particle sizes were associated with less dementia and improved memory.

CONCLUSIONS: Using two independent cohorts, we implicate the longevity CETP gene as a modulator of age-related cognitive function. A specific CETP genotype is associated with lower CETP levels and a favorable lipoprotein profile. It has not been determined whether modulation of this gene prevents age-related decline or AD.

PMID: 1719093


This gene functions as a CETP inhibitor. It increases the size of one's HDL lpoproteins, and also increases the size of VLDL lipoproteins. Apparently larger HDL particles are more efficient at clearing out ones arteries and capilaries, and larger VLDL particles do not form plaques that lead to heart disease, strokes and various dementias including Alzheimers.

Drug companies have been testing CETP inhibitors in the hope of replicating the effect for those without the lucky gene. The first of these CETP inhibotors, Torcetrapib (Pfizer), was associated with excessive all cause mortality in the treatment group receiving a combination of atorvastatin and Torcetrapib. Testing was discontinued. It looked like this approach to treating hypercholesterolemia might be a dead end, but a second CETP inhibitor Anacetrapib (Merck) apparently does not have adverse side effects. Recent publicity has suggested this may be a block-buster drug ofr Merck. Though intended to treat high cholesterol levels, the effects of the Rs5882suggest that even in people with normal cholesterol levels it may lengthen life and prevent dementia.

At this point, I wondered if any currently available supplements might function as CETP inhibitors. I found one, fenofibrate, which is prescribed alone or in combination with metformin (a putative CR mimetic) for diabetes. Apparently fenofibrate has a favorable effect on lipid profiles, as well as normalizing blood glucose, improving insulin sensitivity and generally reversing what is referred to as "metabolic syndrome."

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jun;15(2):196-202. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
Selective CETP inhibition and PPARalpha agonism increase HDL cholesterol and reduce LDL cholesterol in human ApoB100/human CETP transgenic mice.
Hansen MK, McVey MJ, White RF, Legos JJ, Brusq JM, Grillot DA, Issandou M, Barone FC.

Discovery Research, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA, USA. mkhansen99@yahoo.com
Abstract
Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays a key role in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol metabolism, but normal mice are deficient in CETP. In this study, transgenic mice expressing both human apolipoprotein B 100 (ApoB-100) and human CETP (hApoB100/hCETP) were used to characterize the effects of CETP inhibition and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) agonism on lipid profiles. Torcetrapib (3, 10, and 30 mg/kg), a CETP inhibitor, fenofibrate (30 mg/kg), a weak PPARalpha agonist, and GW590735 (3 and 10 mg/kg), a potent and selective PPARalpha agonist were given orally for 14 days to hApoB100/hCETP mice and lipid profiles were assessed. The average percentages of HDL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol fractions in hApoB100/hCETP mice were 34.8%, 61.6%, and 3.6%, respectively, which is similar to those of normolipidemic humans. Both torcetrapib and fenofibrate significantly increased HDL cholesterol and reduced LDL cholesterol, and there was a tendency for torcetrapib to reduce VLDL cholesterol and triglycerides. GW590735 significantly increased HDL cholesterol, decreased LDL and VLDL cholesterol, and significantly reduced triglycerides. Maximal increases in HDL cholesterol were 37%, 53%, and 84% with fenofibrate, torcetrapib, and GW590735, respectively. These results, in mice that exhibit a more human-like lipid profile, demonstrate an improved lipid profile with torcetrapib, fenofibrate, and GW590735, and support the use of selective PPARalpha agonism for the treatment of lipid disorders. In addition, these data demonstrate the use of hApoB100/hCETP transgenic mice to identify, characterize, and screen compounds that increase HDL cholesterol.

PMID: 20332533


At this point I am wondering if use of fenofibrate would be a viable strategy for prolonging one's life while waiting for other, more effective interventions?

#2 Skötkonung

  • Guest
  • 1,556 posts
  • 33
  • Location:Västergötland, SE

Posted 22 November 2010 - 08:02 PM

Well that's unfortunate, I'm Rs5882 (AA).

By the way, Dr Davis discusses this drug (and diet) in his recent post:
http://heartscanblog...tin-buster.html

Edited by Skötkonung, 22 November 2010 - 08:04 PM.


Click HERE to rent this BIOSCIENCE adspot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 AgeVivo

  • Guest, Engineer
  • 2,114 posts
  • 1,555

Posted 22 November 2010 - 09:53 PM

list of human SPNs known to be linked to longevity: http://www.snpedia.c...x.php/Longevity

· rs2802292, in the FOXO3 gene, associated with Japanese malecentarians
· rs1935949, only correlated in women withlongevity
· rs3758391, in the SIRT1 gene, associated withlongevity/cognitive health
· rs5882, in the CETP gene, associated withlongevity/cognitive health
· rs1042522, a SNP in the TP53 gene, associated with a lifespandifference of 3 years
· rs1800795, a SNP in the IL6 gene, seen in a study of ~100nonagenarians
· rs2811712, a SNP associated with risk forphysical impairment in the elderly (indirectly, longevity)
· rs34516635, a SNP in the IGF1R gene,claimed to be of significance based on a study of centenarian Ashkenazi females
· rs2542052, a SNP near the APOC3 gene, wasassociated with longevity in a study of Ashkenazi who lived to at least age 95 [PMID 16602826]
· rs3803304, a SNP in the AKT1 gene, correlating in 3 cohorts


Edited by AgeVivo, 22 November 2010 - 09:57 PM.


sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 maxwatt

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 23 November 2010 - 12:53 AM

AgeVivo - that's a nice list of potentially longevity conferring genes.

I'd like to refocus on CETP inhibitors, which duplicate the effect of one of these genes.

Skötkonung, it's interesting that a low-carb diet duplicates the effect, at least in some people. But not everyone able to benefit from a low-carb diet. Many do not, or even do worse on said diet. It depends on one's genetics.

However, in a specific application: fenofibrate is a low cost, available medication that seems to do what the CETP inhibitory genes do, and could be a way of conferring this benefit on a broader population than just those who are favorably endowed genetically.

#5 mwestbro

  • Guest
  • 81 posts
  • 22

Posted 23 November 2010 - 05:54 PM

I dunno, doesn't look that impressive to me.

1. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Mar 19;99(6A):3C-18C. Epub 2006 Dec 8.

Safety considerations with fibrate therapy.

Davidson MH, Armani A, McKenney JM, Jacobson TA.

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
michaeldavidson@radiantresearch.com

Fibrates are an important class of drugs for the management of dyslipidemia. This
class of drugs is generally well tolerated but is infrequently associated with
several safety issues. Fibrates, most likely by an effect mediated by peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor-alpha, may reversibly increase creatinine and
homocysteine but are not associated with an increased risk for renal failure in
clinical trials. Fibrates are associated with a slightly increased risk (<1.0%)
for myopathy, cholelithiasis, and venous thrombosis. In clinical trials, patients
without elevated triglycerides and/or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
(HDL) levels, fibrates are associated with an increase in noncardiovascular
mortality.
In combination with statins, gemfibrozil generally should be avoided.
The preferred option is fenofibrate, which is not associated with an inhibition
of statin metabolism. Clinicians are advised to measure serum creatinine before
fibrate use and adjust the dose accordingly for renal impairment. Routine
monitoring of creatinine is not required, but if a patient has a clinically
important increase in creatinine, and other potential causes of creatinine
increase have been excluded, consideration should be given to discontinuing
fibrate therapy or reducing the dose.


PMID: 17368275 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


2. N Z Med J. 2007 Sep 7;120(1261):U2706.

Is it time to stop treating dyslipidaemia with fibrates?

Benatar JR, Stewart RA.

Cardiovascular Research Unit, Green Lane Clinical Centre, Green Lane, Auckland.
JBenatar@adhb.govt.nz

AIM: To determine whether evidence from randomised clinical trials supports the
use of fibrates to reduce non-fatal and fatal cardiovascular events in patients
with dyslipidaemia. METHOD: Review of randomised clinical trials of fibrates that
assess clinical outcomes. RESULT: In clinical trials which have which have
included over 40,000 patients there was no difference in all cause mortality for
patients randomised to a fibrate compared to placebo.
Treatment with a fibrate
was associated with a small reduction in the risk of non-fatal cardiovascular
events. DISCUSSION: Current evidence does not support the use of fibrates to
reduce cardiovascular mortality. Other proven strategies including statins,
aspirin, angiotension converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, good blood pressure
control, and lifestyle interventions should be used to reduce cardiovascular
risk.


PMID: 17853928 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


3. Lancet. 2005 Nov 26;366(9500):1849-61.

Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people
with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial.

Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P, Best J, Scott R, Taskinen MR, Forder P, Pillai A,
Davis T, Glasziou P, Drury P, Kesäniemi YA, Sullivan D, Hunt D, Colman P, d'Emden
M, Whiting M, Ehnholm C, Laakso M; FIELD study investigators.

Erratum in:
Lancet. 2006 Oct 21;368(9545):1415.
Lancet. 2006 Oct 21;368(9545):1420.

Comment in:
Lancet. 2005 Nov 26;366(9500):1829-31.
ACP J Club. 2006 May-Jun;144(3):65.
Lancet. 2006 Apr 8;367(9517):1141; author reply 1142-3.
Lancet. 2006 Apr 8;367(9517):1141-2; author reply 1142-3.
Evid Based Med. 2006 Jun;11(3):86.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of
cardiovascular disease, partly owing to dyslipidaemia, which can be amenable to
fibrate therapy. We designed the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in
Diabetes (FIELD) study to assess the effect of fenofibrate on cardiovascular
disease events in these patients. METHODS: We did a multinational, randomised
controlled trial with 9795 participants aged 50-75 years, with type 2 diabetes
mellitus, and not taking statin therapy at study entry. After a placebo and a
fenofibrate run-in phase, we randomly assigned patients (2131 with previous
cardiovascular disease and 7664 without) with a total-cholesterol concentration
of 3.0-6.5 mmol/L and a total-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio of 4.0 or more or
plasma triglyceride of 1.0-5.0 mmol/L to micronised fenofibrate 200 mg daily
(n=4895) or matching placebo (n=4900). Our primary outcome was coronary events
(coronary heart disease death or non-fatal myocardial infarction); the outcome
for prespecified subgroup analyses was total cardiovascular events (the composite
of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary and carotid
revascularisation). Analysis was by intention to treat. The study was
prospectively registered (number ISRCTN 64783481). FINDINGS: Vital status was
confirmed on all but 22 patients. Averaged over the 5 years' study duration,
similar proportions in each group discontinued study medication (10% placebo vs
11% fenofibrate) and more patients allocated placebo (17%) than fenofibrate (8%;
p<0.0001) commenced other lipid treatments, predominantly statins. 5.9% (n=288)
of patients on placebo and 5.2% (n=256) of those on fenofibrate had a coronary
event (relative reduction of 11%; hazard ratio [H R] 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05;
p=0.16). This finding corresponds to a significant 24% reduction in non-fatal
myocardial infarction (0.76, 0.62-0.94; p=0.010) and a non-significant increase
in coronary heart disease mortality (1.19, 0.90-1.57; p=0.22). Total
cardiovascular disease events were significantly reduced from 13.9% to 12.5%
(0.89, 0.80-0.99; p=0.035). This finding included a 21% reduction in coronary
revascularisation (0.79, 0.68-0.93; p=0.003). Total mortality was 6.6% in the
placebo group and 7.3% in the fenofibrate group (p=0.18).
Fenofibrate was
associated with less albuminuria progression (p=0.002), and less retinopathy
needing laser treatment (5.2%vs 3.6%, p=0.0003). There was a slight increase in
pancreatitis (0.5%vs 0.8%, p=0.031) and pulmonary embolism (0.7%vs 1.1%,
p=0.022), but no other significant adverse effects. INTERPRETATION: Fenofibrate
did not significantly reduce the risk of the primary outcome of coronary events.
It did reduce total cardiovascular events, mainly due to fewer non-fatal
myocardial infarctions and revascularisations. The higher rate of starting statin
therapy in patients allocated placebo might have masked a moderately larger
treatment benefit.


PMID: 16310551 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Edited by mwestbro, 23 November 2010 - 06:01 PM.


#6 Marios Kyriazis

  • Guest
  • 466 posts
  • 255
  • Location:London UK

Posted 23 November 2010 - 08:29 PM

It is unlikely that a single gene will affect general aging. Even several genes such as those mentioned above (good list by the way) are unlikely to have appreciable effects on humans. The aging process is much more complicated than that and that's why there have been no real developments in fighting it todate (or in the near future). However, I cannot see the point of not trying.

Click HERE to rent this BIOSCIENCE adspot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#7 VidX

  • Guest
  • 865 posts
  • 137

Posted 23 November 2010 - 09:56 PM

It is unlikely that a single gene will affect general aging. Even several genes such as those mentioned above (good list by the way) are unlikely to have appreciable effects on humans. The aging process is much more complicated than that and that's why there have been no real developments in fighting it todate (or in the near future). However, I cannot see the point of not trying.


Well but at least we know that even just one gene can have a profound effect on other species..

#8 tunt01

  • Guest
  • 2,308 posts
  • 414
  • Location:NW

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:00 PM

Bioscience Question:

 

If CETP inhibition keeps cholesterol in HDL and prevents LDL from being atherogenic, then why did we evolve to have CETP in the first place?  Why does CETP even exist as a pathway in nature if it's inferior and should have been selected out?

 

Thanks.  I'm trying to understand lipid metabolism better.



Click HERE to rent this BIOSCIENCE adspot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#9 treonsverdery

  • Guest
  • 1,312 posts
  • 161
  • Location:where I am at

Posted 04 April 2015 - 09:50 PM

Here is an image of the first page of a patent search on CETP longevity

numerous patents mention the phrase longevity with CETP at patents

 

The graph from US patent US 8703496 B2 strongly suggests the greatest longevity variant of the CETP gene APOC 3 CC as a beneficial longevity gene to give your children.  This looks like a great gene therapy longevity gene to be researched as well.

 

https://www.google.c...=CETP longevity

 

Attached File  Untitled.jpg   116.17KB   1 downloads

Attached File  Untitled.jpg   97.99KB   1 downloads

 

 

 

 


Edited by treonsverdery, 04 April 2015 - 10:33 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users