___________________________________________________________________________________________-=PROGRESS IN NEURON PRODUCTION=-Mon June 30, 2003 05:32 PM ET
By Todd ZwillichWASHINGTON (Reuters Health) -
National Institutes of Health researchers have transformed human embryonic stem cells into cells that function like those lost in patients with Parkinson's disease, an official said Monday.The official told an NIH panel that the research, which has yet to be published, has produced cells resembling human neurons "in every way.""There has been some rather notable progress made," Dr. James Battey, chair of NIH's stem cell research task force, told members of an advisory panel to NIH director Dr. Elias Zerhouni.
It is still too early to tell whether the cells will be able to function normally if implanted into a patient's brain, Battey said in a later interview. But so far the cells "look great in the lab."
Battey told the panel that an NIH research team led by Dr. Ronald D.G. McKay used a five-step process to transform human embryonic stem cells into cells that can produce dopamine, the neurochemical lost in patients with Parkinson's disease.
The cells are able to fire the electrical impulses, or action potentials, that normal cells use to communicate with one another, he said.
"These are cells that resemble in every way a dopamine-producing mid-brain cell," said Battey, who also directs NIH's Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD).McKay, who is chief of laboratory and molecular biology at the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, did not respond to a request for an interview.
But Battey told NIH officials and advisors that the finding shows that basic research is moving forward under a controversial two-year-old White House directive that limited federal funding for embryonic stem research.
The decision, issued by President Bush on Aug 9, 2001, confined federal funding to embryonic stem cell "lines" that had already been derived by the time of the announcement.
"Many of the studies that are begging to be done can be done right now," Battey said
Bush suggested at the time that the limits would prevent public money from being used to destroy human embryos in order to harvest their stem cells. The decision was controversial, with some scientists and research advocates worrying that the limits would stifle the basic research needed to find new disease cures.
Dr. J. Michael Bishop, an advisory board member and chancellor of the University of California at San Francisco, warned that the limits will keep scientists from working with immunologically diverse cells that will be needed for human implantation.
"We can't keep our head in the sand about the need to develop additional lines," he said. "I just don't want anyone to leave this room thinking that the difficulties ... can be discounted."
Former Sen. Connie Mack, R-Fla., a member of the advisory panel, questioned whether the 71 separate groups of embryos eligible for government-funded research under the rules are enough for long-term research. Only 12 stem cell lines from the 71 separate groups are currently available for researchers to use.
Battey said that McKay's finding, along with another that isolated a chemical factor allowing stem cells to freely differentiate into many cell types, showed that basic research is advancing even with limits set by Bush.
However, he also cautioned that the usefulness of the lines for later clinical research "remains a huge question mark."
___________________________________________________________________________________________-=Embryo Cell Research Legal In Australia’s NSW=-Wednesday 2 July 2003, 10:05 AM
NSW parliament has passed historic legislation to govern the use of human embryonic stem cells in medical research.The legislation brings NSW in line with national laws.
In a conscience vote, members of the Legislative Council voted down an amendment which would have banned embryo use by a margin of 22 to 15.
The amendment was proposed by the Reverend Fred Nile.
Science and Medical Research Minister Frank Sartor said the government would monitor the controversial practice.
"This bill creates a strict regulatory framework that will set the rules for embryonic stem cell research," Mr Sartor said.
"NSW has now adopted a position that is nationally consistent and gives certainty to researchers striving for new therapies and cures in the fields of diabetes, spinal cord injury and Alzheimer's disease.
"The new laws also set down strict rules that restrict embryo utilisation to bona fide IVF practices and that would otherwise be destroyed."
©2003 AAP
___________________________________________________________________________________________-=Funding of embryo cell research in EU is a GO!=-The Commission is expected today, Tuesday 1 July, to agree on guidelines that will allow the funding of research involving the use of embryonic stem cells, despite strong moral objections.The decision comes against a background of division in European countries over the ethics of taking and manipulating cells from an embryo - a practice which results in the death of what some consider to be a human life - and the scientific and life saving benefits which the practice may yield.
The UK has long carried out stem cell research while Ireland, Portugal, Germany – the biggest contributor to the EU budget and Italy – current holders of the EU presidency – all oppose the practice.
Critics have argued medical tests show adult stem cell research and umbilical cord blood transplants work just as well, but supporters say adult cells are not as malleable and insufficient work has yet been done to say if adult cells are as useful.Balancing act
Across the Atlantic, US president George W Bush has placed stringent controls on the use of the federal budget to fund such research but has stopped short of an outright ban.
The Commission is expected to give the go-ahead to fund research with stems left over from, or extracted but not suitable, for fertility treatment. The decision is likely to cause consternation in the European Parliament, which voted in April to ban the practice. This blanket ban however was not accepted by member states who asked the Commission to simply regulate its funding of such projects.
Under the Commission's guidelines, money from Italy or Germany, for example could not be used to fund research in those countries, however as contributors to a collective EU budget they may be funding research in other counties.
Written by Andrew Beatty
Edited by Honor Mahony ___________________________________________________________________________________________-=COMMENTARY=-Well AU and Eu are doing the right thing by funding and allowing ESCs to be researched and understood because we all know epigentics are everything when it comes to this
field of research.
As for the "fully functional" neurons, that gives a good feeling to know there are researchers out there making sure we get what we want.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Edited by XxDoubleHelixX, 24 July 2003 - 12:11 AM.