If we had a spirit we wouldn't need cryonics. I believe that once the cryonics patient's stem cells are regrown that their consciousness would be able to return. It would have to be the patient's own stem cells though
My baffling question why Cryonics may not work
#61
Posted 26 June 2014 - 04:49 PM
#62
Posted 26 June 2014 - 05:04 PM
So anyhow my statements are waiting rebuttals...to above-why did you just ignore the statements I made that are waiting disproving OR not make a rebuttal? Anyhow waiting disproving everyone~
#63
Posted 26 June 2014 - 06:06 PM
Double Laugh out Loud!!
#64
Posted 27 June 2014 - 04:47 PM
Read all, putting best statements in this, try and disprove if can or agree, only write serious replies.
I mean if nothing is left behind and no god's spirit or orb(same thing but no god) or no universe kept point of consciousness, then YOU are a formed consciousness, everybody is not everybody because each is conscious of a different thing, yet we are all a basis consciousness that's conscious and each a separate one, and all can have or not the same add-ons of thoughts, memories, body plus it's sensory inputs...and we are just separate basis consciousnesses, the moment recreation has been answered in my references also, and one thing to add would be well how'd you get in the middle of your room, and now a cm more, and more, it's obvious how, and you are you and effectively stay conscious, including what I said in my referred posts...which I'm putting below so just read this whole post.
Like another good statement to add to my last reply is this one - Since we can make a different human or a exact particle duplicate human on a duplicate planet while your still conscious and they are separately conscious and one could die and not conscious as ex. Then after your not conscious when dead, then making a different, or same - as in where last left off - duplicate of particles and area, will be another separate conscious where the conscious is formed in the brain.
You could create a copy as good as can right now on another duplicate planet, it will always be separate from yourself, ex. if one dies then is not conscious but other one is, and you won't continue in other body no because also both duplicates can change to different and back and different by a different thing in front of it plus it's not necessary but can also slowly change body and thoughts at the moment and memories from high technology, which we do right now in growth of ourself. So creating one after your dead will be another consciousness created that's conscious but your not, I prove nothing matters except the basis consciousness, and so just how creating new ones by the day are separate more of these basis consciousnesses, then when your consciousness is not here any more and nothing left, then that's why another basis consciousness will be made that's new and separate.
To follow up here is were I got to, and there is hope for cryonics but only assuming there is universe points of a consciousness that are universally kept, or orb-spirits, or god's spirits.
Edited by ADVANCE, 27 June 2014 - 04:54 PM.
#65
Posted 27 June 2014 - 07:48 PM
Grammar still needs work. I can't understand it.
#66
Posted 27 June 2014 - 08:16 PM
.......Ok Cryonicsculture...just um just let someone else try reading it then you can skip....lol
#67
Posted 28 June 2014 - 04:09 AM
Are you foreign advance? Anyway that aside no part of your argument makes sense
#68
Posted 28 June 2014 - 09:38 AM
It all makes sense.
#69
Posted 29 June 2014 - 04:26 AM
You've made A lot of assumptions about consciousness. You need to provide some proof that it is more than just a physical entity. If it is a purely physical entity then cryonics will work just like anesthesia, but for a longer durationNo I have said that I hope it works and have only said things now awaiting discussion that would mean it wouldn't work, but it would if we have as I said a spirit or orb or universe point so there is some hope, but just going on if nothing is left and just particles and their physics then - is what I'v said on..k hope to hear back your rebuttals as of yet waiting...
Edit: the posts to rebuttal to are above your'll see I listed them just above.
Also your grammar is really really bad as others have claimed. I can't make heads or tails of 90% of what you're attempting to say
Edited by serp777, 29 June 2014 - 04:27 AM.
#70
Posted 29 June 2014 - 06:01 AM
Omg, ifff there's nooooo spirit or orb or universe point and just particles, then with just particles we firstly know for sure we are conscious and it is made up somehow , so in that possibility I said everywhere above beside the others, it means we arn't more then a physical entity and just particles and consciousnesses can just actually be made somehow...Allll that big final writing above tallllkkss and explains about how if just particles then it will onlyy be a new con created...No rebuttals disproving anything from the mass writing above has been said, waiting still~ Like one of you's gotta have a real disproving rebuttal to something and so what ? or else then would agree...Where'd you real smart ones with this go we need someone(s) lol.
Edited by ADVANCE, 29 June 2014 - 06:02 AM.
#71
Posted 29 June 2014 - 10:18 AM
Omg, ifff there's nooooo spirit or orb or universe point and just particles, then with just particles we firstly know for sure we are conscious and it is made up somehow , so in that possibility I said everywhere above beside the others, it means we arn't more then a physical entity and just particles and consciousnesses can just actually be made somehow...Allll that big final writing above tallllkkss and explains about how if just particles then it will onlyy be a new con created...No rebuttals disproving anything from the mass writing above has been said, waiting still~ Like one of you's gotta have a real disproving rebuttal to something and so what ? or else then would agree...Where'd you real smart ones with this go we need someone(s) lol.
You need an antipshycotic. Seriously
#72
Posted 29 June 2014 - 08:57 PM
Omg, ifff there's nooooo spirit or orb or universe point and just particles, then with just particles we firstly know for sure we are conscious and it is made up somehow , so in that possibility I said everywhere above beside the others, it means we arn't more then a physical entity and just particles and consciousnesses can just actually be made somehow...Allll that big final writing above tallllkkss and explains about how if just particles then it will onlyy be a new con created...No rebuttals disproving anything from the mass writing above has been said, waiting still~ Like one of you's gotta have a real disproving rebuttal to something and so what ? or else then would agree...Where'd you real smart ones with this go we need someone(s) lol.
It certainly would take a literary genius to try and interpret what you're trying to say.
What is this orb, spirit, and universal point mumbo jumbo you're talking about?
#73
Posted 30 June 2014 - 12:56 AM
Post #64 is the one btw to all.
Serpent777...spirits is you's know~ and god and devil and angels and demons, are invisible after leave body and are visible to other spiritualnesses or no and only go in bodies.
Orbs are same thing but no god or anything and just all by our selves................
universe points is the particle belief along with consciousnesses are a biological reality that can be made BBut that a consciousnesses actual related data is kept idk somewhere no given point in the universe and when the same consciousness is made with same thoughts, memories and maybe particle locations will start back where left from the kept universe point of this, consciousness.
Lastly particle belief only along with consciousnesses are can be made as we know we are, conscious, as explained in my post #64 if this is the case onlllyyy new consciousnesses are always made no matter what they are, to stay conscious you have to stay conscious.
Anybody thinking they have a rebuttal first read #64 because I did go through everything so, if a knowledgeable person reads it I'm sure they will agree we have to stay conscious if the last way is...and that other ways above may be and so cryonics & con. end could still work assuming something left behind exists....if have a rebuttal then waiting...(read and rebuttal against something within my #64 post)
#74
Posted 30 June 2014 - 01:13 AM
Post #64 is the one btw to all.
Serpent777...spirits is you's know~ and god and devil and angels and demons, are invisible after leave body and are visible to other spiritualnesses or no and only go in bodies.
Orbs are same thing but no god or anything and just all by our selves................
universe points is the particle belief along with consciousnesses are a biological reality that can be made BBut that a consciousnesses actual related data is kept idk somewhere no given point in the universe and when the same consciousness is made with same thoughts, memories and maybe particle locations will start back where left from the kept universe point of this, consciousness.
Lastly particle belief only along with consciousnesses are can be made as we know we are, conscious, as explained in my post #64 if this is the case onlllyyy new consciousnesses are always made no matter what they are, to stay conscious you have to stay conscious.
Anybody thinking they have a rebuttal first read #64 because I did go through everything so, if a knowledgeable person reads it I'm sure they will agree we have to stay conscious if the last way is...and that other ways above may be and so cryonics & con. end could still work assuming something left behind exists....if have a rebuttal then waiting...(read and rebuttal against something within my #64 post)
" are invisible after leave body and are visible to other spiritualnesses or no and only go in bodies."
Invisible in what respect? Assuming they do exist, there's no reason why they wouldn't give off black body radiation, since those spirits would be composed of energy. That would make them visible to specific instruments.
"Orbs are same thing but no god or anything and just all by our selves"
That is extremely unscientific. How would consciousness remain once the brain had died? What medium would contain the information that composes consciousness? What kind of particles would construct this vague entity? It's not reasonable that electrical impulses in the brain would somehow lead to these orb things.
"spirits is you's know~ and god and devil and angels and demons"
Like from Islam, or from Christianity, or from scientology, etc? This is very vague and is not scientific.
Also again, if you were created 5 seconds ago with all the memories of your previous life, you would think your consciousness existed during those memories, even though it really didnt. So in theory, it's very possible that consciousness is non linear: a sequence of new, recursive consciousnesses that are all unique, but have identical memories to the previous consciousnesses that existed previously. All the different consciousnesses would believe that they were the same consciousness. This kind of logic also resolves any philosophical problems that consciousness creates and is the most reasonable way consciousness works. Analogously, it would be like a processor cycle-- each cycle would have a different state, unless the state was preserved in something like cryonics and then activated later. In fact, cryonics is probably one of the only ways to preserve a specific consciousness.
#75
Posted 30 June 2014 - 06:21 AM
of the 4 possibilities the top two that are orb or spirit are most likely unknown particles probably, or a whole thing and could call it a consciousness particle~
No because "you" (whoever reading this including I) knows your "still" here, you wouldn't if new ones were being created, you yourself would then be not conscious and ended, but noohwo as we can tell we are effectively still staying conscious, plus my #64 post goes through everything else on this and everything else.
Edited by ADVANCE, 30 June 2014 - 06:24 AM.
#76
Posted 01 July 2014 - 10:32 PM
Writing as someone who knows that I will lose consciousness before I die. I am hoping that some lab in the future might grow my stem cells an regrow most of my brain with them. Hopefully the morphogenetic field will regrow the same electrical pattern that I had when I was well and regrow my consciousness. I don't see that as impossible.
#77
Posted 02 July 2014 - 04:55 AM
Again, what do you have to say about my example? If you were created 5 seconds ago with all your previous memories, how would you know that you weren't the consciousness that existed during those memories? There is no way you would be able to tell one wau or the other, so your knowing is absolutely meaninglessof the 4 possibilities the top two that are orb or spirit are most likely unknown particles probably, or a whole thing and could call it a consciousness particle~
No because "you" (whoever reading this including I) knows your "still" here, you wouldn't if new ones were being created, you yourself would then be not conscious and ended, but noohwo as we can tell we are effectively still staying conscious, plus my #64 post goes through everything else on this and everything else.
Edited by serp777, 02 July 2014 - 04:56 AM.
#78
Posted 02 July 2014 - 11:51 AM
No there is meaningfulness knowing, lol ok anyhow so you read through post #64 right? But admit it, we arrrre definitely staying effectively conscious, or else there wouldn't be any of us, one in a long tube with water walls in space, one on a planets beach, one is marble house, we are separately staying conscious of our own different surrounding signals incoming to the conscieeous...
You Know it!
With everything said so far and post #64 all should agree~ That IF something is not left behind such as a spirit or orb or universe point of consciousness or simply a horrible excuse of cause it will just come back which my sayings overrule it anyhow, <these are "left behind" for to happen though, IF nothing left, as my writings explain perfectly, creating of a consciousness will always happen when one is created and no matter if identical particles in the radius size of a galaxy-self and planet~ As two of my statement explains it could be made on a duplicate planet and duplicate particles and is separate if one dies oh oh ones not conscious, and that a consciousness can slowly change any particles and thoughts and memories and is just a basis consciousness.
Edited by ADVANCE, 02 July 2014 - 11:53 AM.
#79
Posted 03 July 2014 - 05:35 PM
Also you could only argument every 0.00000000001 of a second moment recreation of you-consciousness and the memories you know and believe, because what destroys the theory of slept and awoke and recreated is that then your the same you and are for 12 or more hours, even if 8 seconds, in that time you can stay you and create memories ect, so saying anything but the littlest mila micro second is false then as we know we each seperately stay "you" and conscious for this 4 or 8 or 12-however long staying up seconds/hours, and if that's so then we do stayyy conscious and all is real for forever until dead, also if a new one created and we don't effectively stay conscious and are not conscious then you wouldn't, know it, ~ Allll said above explains why what I else said is right and why and why the 000.1 moment new statement is wrong including this reply, and again if not said already, it's obvious we stay effectively conscious and a new one isn't created and you gone nope and the 000.1 doesn't even affect it if it is happening.
#80
Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:49 AM
Read #64 #75 & #79.
Also above in post 79 I meant, if nothing is left behind, then no matter the particle formation, and the thoughts and memories and body sensory signals getting sent to conscious, it will always be a new created consciousness, you won't be conscious anymore, you can make one on a duplicate pplanet while alive and see it created a new consciousness that's separate so it proves it...
#81
Posted 08 July 2014 - 02:47 AM
Actually above statement is not 79 lol it's something different.
#82
Posted 11 July 2014 - 01:43 AM
No there is meaningfulness knowing, lol ok anyhow so you read through post #64 right? But admit it, we arrrre definitely staying effectively conscious, or else there wouldn't be any of us, one in a long tube with water walls in space, one on a planets beach, one is marble house, we are separately staying conscious of our own different surrounding signals incoming to the conscieeous...
You Know it!
With everything said so far and post #64 all should agree~ That IF something is not left behind such as a spirit or orb or universe point of consciousness or simply a horrible excuse of cause it will just come back which my sayings overrule it anyhow, <these are "left behind" for to happen though, IF nothing left, as my writings explain perfectly, creating of a consciousness will always happen when one is created and no matter if identical particles in the radius size of a galaxy-self and planet~ As two of my statement explains it could be made on a duplicate planet and duplicate particles and is separate if one dies oh oh ones not conscious, and that a consciousness can slowly change any particles and thoughts and memories and is just a basis consciousness.
I have read through post 64 and post 79.
I'm still waiting for an explanation of: "Again, what do you have to say about my example? If you were created 5 seconds ago with all your previous memories, how would you know that you weren't the consciousness that existed during those memories? There is no way you would be able to tell one way or the other"
"But admit it, we arrrre definitely staying effectively conscious, or else there wouldn't be any of us,"
what? Why do I need to admit it? How do you know that? It's not like people stop existing because they go unconscious.
"As two of my statement explains it could be made on a duplicate planet and duplicate particles and is separate if one dies oh oh ones not conscious"
Identical quantum states for all of these particles? I see no reason why those consciousnesses should be different. They're not aware of each other's thoughts but they're the same consciousness at the instant they're created. After that, due to probability, those consciousnesses become different, which supports my assertion that the human existence is a linear progression of different and unique consciousnesses that only exist for an instant.
In programming, an object that has identical properties and variables compared to another object is the same object but just a different instance. WHy should consciousness be different or special? An apple with the exact same quantum state as another apple is the same apple
#83
Posted 31 July 2014 - 06:36 PM
Oddly enough, this is a good point:
"If you were created 5 seconds ago with all your previous memories, how would you know that you weren't the consciousness that existed during those memories? There is no way you would be able
to tell one way or the other"
The answer is that there's no meaningful distinction between what you describe (in this sentence, at least) and the way the system (the universe) actually works.
If I take your thought experiment to imply what I think it implies, then it changes nothing at all, hence it's not meaningful in the way you apparently think it is.
Let me put it this way:
Imagine that time ran backwards.
Do you imagine the phenomena of your familiar experience running in reverse like a video being played backwards? If so, that's wrong; that might be the concept you intended to communicate, but as far as the universe is concerned, it's a meaningless idea.
If the universe were a film reel or a video, then as far as the images are concerned, nothing is different if it's run backwards or forwards; does a character on a page of a book know if you're flipping through the pages from front to back or vice-versa? The universe might as well be running backwards right "now" (see how that's a nonsensical sentence? that's because it's conceptually incoherent in the first place); you can only be conscious of one direction of time because the existence of your brain (and consciousness) is the result of evolutionary processes that are entropically shaped and restricted (in one direction or the other).
All you ever really are is a conscious awareness inhabiting a single frame in the reel (called "now") attached to a particular spatiotemporal location that offers you a perspective restricted to the memories embedded in your brain. I would go further and say that the self (as we define it) is therefore an illusion, but that's beyond the scope of this thread... Google "self illusion" or "illusion of self" if you're interested.
BTW:
Can't make much sense of anything else you're saying....but that was a very good point that gets at the heart of the distinction between reality and perception.
Edited by caliban, 17 April 2018 - 02:17 PM.
c
#84
Posted 24 October 2014 - 09:20 PM
There is a book on this issue (and others) by physicist Roger Penrose, "The Emperor's New Mind." It's very interesting, nevertheless I mostly disagree with Penrose's theory.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: cryonics, question, consciousness
Round Table Discussion →
Humanities →
Spirituality →
Shamanism, meditation, neuroscience and exploring the human consciousnessStarted by Galaxyshock , 21 Mar 2024 shamanism, mysticism and 4 more... |
|
|
||
Round Table Discussion →
Risks & Survival →
Cryonics →
could this mothball cryonicsStarted by Rib Jig , 03 Jun 2022 cryonics |
|
|
||
Science & Health →
Supplements →
Senolytics →
Senolytics after radiation exposure? (CT)Started by JimWoodall , 25 Apr 2022 question |
|
|
||
Round Table Discussion →
Risks & Survival →
Cryonics →
New cryopreservation method is much betterStarted by Dream Big , 18 Nov 2021 cryonics, methods, intersting |
|
|
||
Round Table Discussion →
Risks & Survival →
Cryonics →
animal brought back to life after 24000 years frozen in iceStarted by Rib Jig , 28 Jun 2021 cryonics |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users