#211
Posted 17 October 2014 - 05:02 PM
#212
Posted 17 October 2014 - 07:43 PM
If you want to blame political parties for the ebola scare, perhaps use the politics forum.
In the case of Pham, according to media reports, she was confirmed as having ebola, on Sunday, got a transfusion on Monday, was upgraded to good on Tuesday, and says she feels really well today. That is pretty amazing for the most super-ist, deadliest, terrifying, deadly virus the WORLD HAS EVER KNOWN!!!
Ok, I exaggerate, but with purpose. Everyone is freaking out as if this is the movie "outbreak" or "the stand". From what we have seen in the U.S. (outside of the outrageous careless treatment of Mr. Duncan), this is not the case. Ebola can be treated effectively.
#213
Posted 17 October 2014 - 09:26 PM
Edited by Nemo888, 17 October 2014 - 09:42 PM.
sponsored ad
#214
Posted 17 October 2014 - 09:46 PM
#215
Posted 18 October 2014 - 12:42 AM
#216
Posted 18 October 2014 - 01:45 AM
Obviously judging by how Texas was bungled more panic is currently needed. Health care teams need better equipment and to be trained on how to use it. Paramedics need better PPE and training including protocols for moving query Ebola patients. Waste disposal policies need to be formulated. Border personnel need equipment to read temperatures of passengers and regulations related to what countries are high risk. The vaccines have to be mass produced as well as the antiviral drugs for those already infected. There is still a lot to do before we can sit on our asses again.
#217
Posted 18 October 2014 - 05:29 AM
#218
Posted 18 October 2014 - 06:49 AM
The diference between the politicians + the crowd and the medical people, maybe is because the medical peole know how fast an air born virus infection may spread, and how hard it is some times to be hold.
This is why the politicians and the crowd says "but there are only several cases. This is not epidemic" and the doctors buy protective suits and send the nurses to trat the ebola patients.
#219
Posted 18 October 2014 - 12:09 PM
The transfusion treatment: Brantly provided blood for Pham. Usual mainstream media reports do not go into much detail. What part of the immune system were they hoping would help out Pham. The adaptive (seems unlikey), or the innate? Or is there something else I am missing?
Does anyone think this was the primary reason for Pham's quick recovery?
#220
Posted 18 October 2014 - 01:16 PM
I already answered you that question. They use the blood plasma from someone from the 30% who survived. There are supposed to be effective antibodies against the ebola.
#221
Posted 18 October 2014 - 03:37 PM
The transfusion treatment: Brantly provided blood for Pham. Usual mainstream media reports do not go into much detail. What part of the immune system were they hoping would help out Pham. The adaptive (seems unlikey), or the innate? Or is there something else I am missing?
Does anyone think this was the primary reason for Pham's quick recovery?
It was the primary reason. She did not have time to produce significant antibodies yet. It is likely serum containing antigens and antibodies to kick start her defense. Transfusions are much more dangerous than people realize. As a general rule a person can have one major transfusion in their lifetime. After that the risk of an immune reaction is so high it is only acceptable if there is an extreme risk to life. It is not something you would ever do for a flu.
* 800 vials of Canadian VSV-EBOV vaccine out the door bitches! It can even stop the virus dead an entire day after infection. Thank God this is finally ramping up. The Kobinger vaccine means my friends all come home alive and my buddies at work don't die if they make a tiny mistake.
http://www.phac-aspc...ebov-fs-eng.php
Edited by Nemo888, 18 October 2014 - 03:59 PM.
#222
Posted 19 October 2014 - 10:00 AM
The transfusion treatment: Brantly provided blood for Pham. Usual mainstream media reports do not go into much detail. What part of the immune system were they hoping would help out Pham. The adaptive (seems unlikey), or the innate? Or is there something else I am missing?
Does anyone think this was the primary reason for Pham's quick recovery?
It was the primary reason. She did not have time to produce significant antibodies yet. It is likely serum containing antigens and antibodies to kick start her defense. Transfusions are much more dangerous than people realize. As a general rule a person can have one major transfusion in their lifetime. After that the risk of an immune reaction is so high it is only acceptable if there is an extreme risk to life. It is not something you would ever do for a flu.
* 800 vials of Canadian VSV-EBOV vaccine out the door bitches! It can even stop the virus dead an entire day after infection. Thank God this is finally ramping up. The Kobinger vaccine means my friends all come home alive and my buddies at work don't die if they make a tiny mistake.
http://www.phac-aspc...ebov-fs-eng.php
What would really be helpful in today's interconnected world is an open-as-possible reporting of the vaccine as it is being trialed in these initial stages.
#223
Posted 19 October 2014 - 10:13 AM
Interesting the reaction in Belize - NO potentially ebola-infected person is going to step foot in their country: http://www.khou.com/...matic/17522091/
Belize's 7 News reports the Belize government refused a U.S. request Thursday to let the Dallas health care worker disembark in Belize so she could be flown home by air ambulance from a local airport.
#224
Posted 19 October 2014 - 10:24 AM
#225
Posted 20 October 2014 - 02:25 AM
I don't understand how this is not spreading to neighbouring countries??? I would have expected this to spread all around Africa quite quickly. Perhaps it can e contained quite easily. Perhaps these countries are good in that there is not much international travel from them.
#226
Posted 20 October 2014 - 08:28 AM
ether that or the information of the spread has been suppressed in order to prevent chaos. Just recently the last areas of Seirra Leon reported Ebola cases. Let's see what happens a month from now.I don't understand how this is not spreading to neighbouring countries??? I would have expected this to spread all around Africa quite quickly. Perhaps it can e contained quite easily. Perhaps these countries are good in that there is not much international travel from them.
#227
Posted 20 October 2014 - 10:20 AM
#228
Posted 20 October 2014 - 11:19 AM
Now is the time to buy several tons of cocoa
#231
Posted 20 October 2014 - 05:16 PM
Citing from your link:
This means, that the Ebola is transmited by all the possible ways, for which the microbes are being transmited.
#232
Posted 21 October 2014 - 06:34 PM
Ebola is a veryy interesting virus, it's an ARN virus, wich mean he is most likely to mutate every time he goes infect someone else (copy himself actually). Every time this happen, 1 or 2 mutations are made, most often its very minor mutation (fortunately or not), but the more he infect people the more he can mutate in a stronger form.. Or actually even the opposite. Im not a virus specialist, but im really wondering how much is smart such a virus ? is he smart enough to mutate in a more agressiv form (increase rate of death, increase days to kill someone to allow him to infect more people etc) or can he destroy actually himself ? Im not sure its always pure chance and im not sure a vaccin which works for a strain is effective for a far other strain.
any specialist ?
#233
Posted 21 October 2014 - 06:43 PM
I am not a virusologist also, but what you are talking about has been researched in the evolutionary biology. What will happen in brief, is that: if the Ebola virus is so changable, it will evolve in order to adopt the environment, e.g. it will evolve in such a way, that not to be affected from drugs or from the immune system, by selecting the most sustainable mutations, and leaving the other mutations to be destroyed. Something simmilar happens today with the usual bacteria.
#234
Posted 21 October 2014 - 07:26 PM
very interesting, but if we take this into consideration, what can be the change in the death rate for exemple ? We see variation between 50 and 90% death by case
#235
Posted 21 October 2014 - 07:35 PM
The death rate depends on many factors, and it happens so, that you can't calculate it in advance. It depends not only from the microbe, but from the immune system, the genetic particularities of the infected, that may the virus easier or more difficult to make damage, etc. Viruses can be defeated. The deadliest pox for example no longer exist in the environment. Only the small pox and the large pox remained. But waiting them to become harmles seems not to be the good strategy.
#236
Posted 21 October 2014 - 07:58 PM
Yes I understand that part, there is always external variable, but if we consider a large number of infected, we can have an average death rate wich can be relevant to take into account. I mean if we speak only in terms of the devlopment you was speaking about, the virus is more willing to be agressiv to the organism (more willing to bring to death) or its can be the opposite (something not dangerous but who live longer in the body ? since he can mutate to have a longer incubating period in order to be more transmited, it can be weaker and then less death.
by the way, the virus is more contagious than before, he is far more present in both blood serum and urine of infected people, i think around 10 times more than what was the case in 70s. He improves his effectivness to be transmited, im sure using the same way of transmission however (i do not believe in the airborne theory)
#237
Posted 21 October 2014 - 08:13 PM
I read the other day that none of the known viruses that affect humans has ever been known to change to become airborne transmission. Sure there are some that already are but the change hasn't happened in those that don't have this capability already. This shows that mutation is unlikely to result in this happening.
#238
Posted 21 October 2014 - 08:21 PM
yes but since ebola cant be in someone without "balancing" with the immune system (he win or he die), i dont see how it could be different. Interesting however..
actually Pwain, no virus studied until today have changed their method of transmission, and we are not speaking only about airborne. Some virus such as flu have been made airborne in lab, but then became close to 0% agressiv when it comes to health damage. The virus structure was too much changed. For ebola since it's an ARN one, its much more different, lets see what mother nature can do. For now, vitamin C and selenium seems good natural quandidate to prevent it.
#239
Posted 21 October 2014 - 08:28 PM
The mother nature allows everything to evolve. If the virus evolves fast, it is a danger.
The best thing will be vaccine and effective treatment. Vitamin C and selenium rise your immune system, but they will not be enough.
sponsored ad
#240
Posted 22 October 2014 - 03:30 AM
So what about Ebola is ultimately responsible for killing the people?
From what I read Ebola does a few things.
Dehydration? Can be treated either drinking large volumes of saline (or introduced intravenously)
Internal/External bleeding? Could this be remedied or helped by taking drugs or foods that thicken the blood? I assume things like asprin or fish oil or warfarin (if you needed to take it) would be counter productive. Internal/External bleeding also has a disatrous affect on blood pressure but does this happen from acute dehydration or the virus attacking the red blood cells and organs and nothing to do with being dehyrated
Kidney/Liver failure? Is the organ failures caused by loss of blood, blood pressure and dehydration? Or the virus actively attacking the organs. If someone who contracts Ebola from the moment the symptoms appear stays totally hydrated, will he/she have to deal with this problem?
Diarrhea kills nearly a million people each year, but I'd almost be certain to live because I can continue to drink clean water/saline and get treatment.
Ebola causes severe and acute dehydration through vomiting and diarrhea. Not keeping food down means no energy either so we are fighting an illness and could be hypoglycemic at the same time and given we are 70% water, if we don't replace the fluids lost, we are sure to die very quickly. Our bodies simply do not have the time to beat it if nothing is done. The way that Ebola works it doesn't give the people much time (or the stomach) to replace the fluids. It's not just water we lose but electrolytes.
Apparantly in Nigeria (they claim to have beaten it) the mortality was a bit lower and one nurse who was affected (and recovered) said she drank around 5L a day of a salt/sugar water solution. It tasted awful but she knew she had to if she was to beat it.
So I guess if the ultimate thing that killed people with Ebola was dehyration, then people in the 1st world do not have AS much to worry about (but still ultimately worry of course.... Why would you want that hideous virus that can and will kill people on your doorstep).
So is dehydration the main, ultimate cause of death... Is dehydration the beginning of a cascade of symptoms (such as bleeding and then organ failure) that if you leave it too long, your body proceeds to the next step such as bleeding and your chances become slim. But if you dont let your body get to that step and stay hydrated from the beginning, will your body have time to recover?
Edited by shifter, 22 October 2014 - 03:34 AM.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: ebola
Round Table Discussion →
Risks & Survival →
Do Others Knowledge Pose A Risk For Survival AnywhereStarted by Multivitz , 30 Jan 2015 truth, true, drug, mind and 6 more... |
|
|
||
Round Table Discussion →
Risks & Survival →
Evidence Shows MIT Had Cure for Ebola Back in 2011Started by eon , 08 Dec 2014 ebola |
|
|
||
Round Table Discussion →
Humanities →
Society & Politics →
Obama's Ebola CzarStarted by Mind , 18 Oct 2014 ebola, czar, ron klain |
|
|
||
Science & Health →
Supplements →
C60Oil →
Fullerene Sugar Balls: c60 Glycofullerenes inhibit viral infection & DC-SIGN antagonists... EBOLAStarted by PhysiologicOxygen , 03 Oct 2014 c60, ebola, fullerene and 4 more... |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users