• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

Towards the identification of new physics through quark flavour violating processes

physics

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 redFishBlueFish

  • Guest
  • 186 posts
  • 218
  • Location:USA

Posted 21 August 2014 - 04:13 PM


http://m.iopscience....85/77/8/086201/

We outline a systematic strategy that should help in this decade to identify new physics (NP) beyond the standard model (SM) by means of quark flavour violating processes, and thereby extend the picture of short distance physics down to scales as short as 10−20 m and even shorter distance scales corresponding to energies of 100 TeV. 



#2 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 22 August 2014 - 12:33 AM

From the abstract:

 

 

Assuming that the data on the selected observables will be very precise, we stress the importance of correlations between these observables as well as of future precise calculations of non-perturbative parameters by means of lattice QCD simulations with dynamical fermions. Our strategy consists of twelve steps, which we will discuss in detail while illustrating the possible outcomes with the help of the SM, models with constrained minimal flavour violation (CMFV), MFV at large and models with tree-level flavour changing neutral currents mediated by neutral gauge bosons and scalars.

 

In the first step, they admitted that they were powerless over alcohol, and that their lives had become unmanageable..?


  • Cheerful x 2
  • Good Point x 1

#3 StevesPetRat

  • Guest
  • 565 posts
  • 86
  • Location:San Jose, CA

Posted 06 December 2014 - 12:45 PM

There's a little joke in the physics world that when a paper has "Towards" in the title, it's not actually going anywhere. It would be really cool if this worked, but with the utter absence of any evidence of new physics at those scales from the copious amounts of available data, I'm skeptical.


  • Cheerful x 1

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 Multivitz

  • Guest
  • 550 posts
  • -47
  • Location:UK
  • NO

Posted 21 December 2015 - 01:39 AM

Did QM SM ever get a rewrite after the Black box data, that was the SM basis, turned out to be impossible to set(because of the interference)?
I get QM, but I prefer Dan Winters take on things as he sees it without CM.
  • Pointless, Timewasting x 1





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: physics

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users