Ah, I just have to chime in,
There are many variables involved in cryonics. One may be revived in a state varying from some sort of 'clone', to a 'decent' semblance of their former self. I ask myself, knowing this is the range, do I still want to do it?
Let's say, at the 'clone' end of the range, what would I think of things? By the way, the analogy to a clone is really not accurate I think. Maybe in the case of a kidney, or something, but not of the brain. The brain is constructed over the course of time built partly on the blueprint of DNA, and so on, but also shaped very much by environment and experience. Just, the brain can not be 'cloned', unless a copy is made utilizing all of the factors involved with environment, memories, and experience. At which time, you would be at the 'decent' semblance range of things...
Anyways, at the 'least semblance' range of revival, I am assuming I would be reconstructed into the form of some sort of 'whole' person. Perhaps I could even be 'implanted' with some sort of knowledge that I would be able to eat, and walk, and talk, and have a decent level of awareness and knowledge of the world, and so on. Or perhaps not, and I would have to learn a lot, but would have the capability to do so, not to have a life as a bumbling idiot.
It may be, even at this range of things, assuming I understood what had happened to me, that I had lost all of my former memories, and my personality is definitely changed from what it was before, that I may have some, even if just a little, sense of continuity of 'self'. Science and technology did what it did, and now I am who I am, with some sort of connection, even tenuous, to my former self.
At the 'decent' semblance range of things, this continuity would be much stronger.
I really don't think the science of cryonics is a 'bet'. It's not 'win-lose'. Assuming technology and science does progress to where it needs to, to at least bring a person back as a 'whole' person, it is a matter of amount of continuity to one's self.
I am still just thinking about the basics of cryonics. There are many other aspects that maybe could be described as wagers. Will science and technology really progress? Will there be enough interest and resources to revive people? Will there be energy and a stable enough socio-political environment around in the future? I really don't know what to think of those things. It may be, that is really mostly is at stake, and the gamble then becomes one where the thought of being buried or cremated is a definite ending of continuity, and cryonics is a possibility to continue life.
Jeff
Edited by JJN, 29 January 2010 - 07:40 PM.