• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
* * * * - 9 votes

Stem cell self-renewal with C60

c60 stem cells mitochondria fusion stearic acid aging hydroxytyrosol olive oil mct oil proliferation

  • Please log in to reply
2630 replies to this topic

#2611 Kelvin

  • Member
  • 237 posts
  • 37
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 01 May 2025 - 07:42 PM

"A hypothesis is a statement that explains what happens under certain conditions."
 
No it doesn't - that's ridiculous - if it did it wouldn't be an hypothesis. It is a educated guess at explaining. 
 
Here is the thing: an hypothesis is effectively a hybrid of fact and some exrapolated or appropriated theory - it will have justification in it's formation, it is made up of stuff. That is how Turnbuckle introduced his protocols.

 
 
I never said the statement in a hypothesis was true or false.  
 
I meant only that the statement is proposing something is true under certain conditions.
 

Now to suggest that once this hypothesis' first breath is drawn the only way to debunk it is through testing it, is crazy - because if the factual or theoretical assumptions underpinning its inception can be rendered doubtful or false, then the hypothesis must be reconstituted subject to those challenges.

 
So now you think it is "crazy" to test a scientific hypothesis with scientific tests (???) even though YOU put forward scientific studies on C60 use (without fusion) in an attempt to refute Turnbuckle???
 
If YOU think it is "crazy" to use scientific tests to test a hypothesis then WHY did YOU refer to studies of scientific tests on C60?
 
Which is it?
 
;)


Edited by Kelvin, 01 May 2025 - 07:47 PM.


#2612 ambivalent

  • Guest
  • 788 posts
  • 187
  • Location:uk
  • NO

Posted 01 May 2025 - 07:48 PM

The observation referenced to Turnbuckle's disclosure of some degree of accelerated aging was not during his c60 wilderness years, but rather when in the depths of his protocols - perhaps 3-4 years ago. I don't argue c60 was no longer doing it during those prior years, which is why interest dropped off on the forums, and I too believe it needs something in addition, again, I cite Turnbuckle as a real outlier, other's weren't getting his effects - many could have done with some additional head hair. 

 

I am not attempting to downplay the importance of epigentic age as a marker of aging - but I don't think its underhyped. It does seem, though, that the epigenitic age reversal is easily undone, and must be kept on top of. It is an important marker, but it is not signal of age reversal as we would like it to be - if I can get an epigentic age reversal of 20 years six months from now, I haven't banked 20 years of life extension, assuming I don't take a one-way ticket to the our reaches of our solar system. 

 

This though does kinda feel like what happened in Baati, and yes this was over an extended period of time, but the biological boon those rats received during the c60-based intervention appeared to have been more than banked.

 

So when Turnbuckle's friends disclosed, as he would have wished them to do, that he appeared to noticeably aged over a short period of time, it set the alarm bells ringing - and what it had showed is that there had not been some biological reset, otherwise there wouldn't have been rapid aging.

It may well be that forever while the epigentic age is say -20 years, there are rejuvenating effects, but it may be difficult to keep on top of it, for whatever reasons. Or perhaps it can be, but then aging finds another way. We don't have these answers, but we have to try - and keep revaluating, not get married to ideas.

 

But for those rats in Baati, it was no false dawn - whatever the entity that was that intervention in its entirety comprised of, it worked, and might have been made to work even better.    


Edited by ambivalent, 01 May 2025 - 08:15 PM.

  • Dangerous, Irresponsible x 1
  • Good Point x 1

Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for C60 HEALTH to support Longecity (this will replace the google ad above).

#2613 ambivalent

  • Guest
  • 788 posts
  • 187
  • Location:uk
  • NO

Posted 01 May 2025 - 08:12 PM

 

So now you think it is "crazy" to test a scientific hypothesis with scientific tests (???) even though YOU put forward scientific studies on C60 use (without fusion) in an attempt to refute Turnbuckle???
 

 

Read what I wrote:

 

"Now to suggest that once this hypothesis' first breath is drawn the only way to debunk it is through testing it, is crazy"

 

....with the emphasis on "only". 

 

If you formulate an hypothesis with an assumption or fact that can be proven to be false, then the hypothesis in its present form is discredited without ever being tested.

 

The only alternative is to reformulate the hypothesis - and test. 

 

Now if a direct irrefutable implication of this hypothesis of Turnbuckle, were say, that taking c60 without fusion leads to accelerated aging and shortened life, then the hypothesis is debunked, without needing to be directly tested - because said implication of that hypothesis has been tested, and found to be false (at least in mice, and very likely in humans). I don't believe this is the case, btw, but represents a significant challenge to that hypothesis. 

 

As I said, if there were no fusion in Baati, then Turnbuckle's hypothesis is undermined without being tested, because the hypothesis was based on an assumption of fusion in the study, that was false. 

 

As such Turnbuckle would need to find another explanation to drive the hypothesis or go in search of an alternative.

 

You could get lucky anyway, and whatever Turnbuckle did was beneficial - which should be of no surprise because it repleted stem cells stocks. But that doesn't make it Baati, and c60 could  synergise with this protocol while recreating the effects of that 2012 study - it is hardly some prosaic molecule, is it? 


Edited by ambivalent, 01 May 2025 - 08:18 PM.

  • Well Written x 1
  • Pointless, Timewasting x 1

#2614 Kelvin

  • Member
  • 237 posts
  • 37
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 01 May 2025 - 08:16 PM

The observation referenced to Turnbuckle's disclosure of some degree of accelerated aging was not during his c60 wilderness years, but rather when in the depths of his protocols - perhaps 3-4 years ago. I don't argue c60 was no longer doing it during those prior years, which is why interest dropped off on the forums, and I too believe it needs something in addition, again, I cite Turnbuckle as a real outlier, other's weren't getting his effects - many could have done with some additional head hair. 

 

I am not attempting to downplay the importance of epigentic age as a marker of aging - but I don't think its underhyped. It does seem that, though, that the epigenitic age reversal is easily undone, and must be kept on top of. It is an important marker, but it is not signal of age reversal as we would like it to be - if I can get an epigentic age reversal of 20 years six months from now, I haven't banked 20 years of life extension, assuming I don't take a one-way ticket to the our reaches of our solar system. 

 

This though does kinda feel like what happened in Baati, and yes this was over an extended period of time, but the biological boon those rats received during the c60-based intervention appeared to have been more than banked.

 

So when Turnbuckle's friends disclosed, as he would have wished them to do, that he appeared to noticeably aged over a short period of time, it set the alarm bells ringing - and what it had showed is that there had not been some biological reset, otherwise there wouldn't have been rapid aging.

 

Turnbuckle temporarily lost the epigenetic age reversal when he used a telomerase lengthener which he surmised kept older cells alive and prevented stem cells from replacing them with younger cells that would have al lower epigenetic age.

 

When he dropped the telomerase extending supplement he regained his younger epigenetic results.

 

The fact a telomerase lengthener eliminated his epigenetic benefits, and dropping it restored them to younger levels, is another piece of evidence in favor of the idea the protocol replenishes stem cell niches.

 

Epigenetic age reversal can be lost, as Michael Lustgarten has noted here and at his website about his experiences with reversing biological age.

 

However, epigenetic is still a good predictor of biological age and, besides, the Baati study looked at actual lifespan.


Edited by Kelvin, 01 May 2025 - 08:17 PM.


#2615 Kelvin

  • Member
  • 237 posts
  • 37
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 01 May 2025 - 08:21 PM

Read what I wrote:

 

"Now to suggest that once this hypothesis' first breath is drawn the only way to debunk it is through testing it, is crazy"

 

....with the emphasis on "only". 

 

If you formulate an hypothesis with an assumption or fact that can be proven to be false, then the hypothesis in its present form is discredited without ever being tested.

 

 

Name ONE scientific hypothesis in all of history that was proven true or false WITHOUT testing it.........

 

;)



#2616 ambivalent

  • Guest
  • 788 posts
  • 187
  • Location:uk
  • NO

Posted 01 May 2025 - 08:43 PM

Turnbuckle temporarily lost the epigenetic age reversal when he used a telomerase lengthener which he surmised kept older cells alive and prevented stem cells from replacing them with younger cells that would have al lower epigenetic age.

 

When he dropped the telomerase extending supplement he regained his younger epigenetic results.

 

 

This was still earlier, within the protocol - because he believed it gave dying cells extra life. This was a different time to which I from memory cite - whatever the reason there will always be reasons. And it rather makes my point, Turnbuckle didn't age 20 years because his epigentic age did. I suspect epigentic age represents a biological state, rather than an aging one (which contributes to aging) - it is to volatile to represent biological age.

 

As for your point about discrediting an hypothesis without testing - if I believe I have designed a perpetual motion machine, but my hypothesis is based upon some assumption which conrtadicts a law of nature, then the machine h doesn't need to be built, for the hypothesis to be disproven, or discredited. The hypothesis that this machine will work, is based on a false assumption. And we should be interested in observations that discredit hypotheses.

 

It is not your decision to make - if there is evidence which contradicts the assumptions behind or the consequences of this or any other hypothesis, they have a right to be aired, and people can revaluate their choice based upon it. And any rationally minded person would want to know this.  

 

Turnbuckle, didn't just say "trust me do this" - he provided a basis for doing so, and as a result offers up a challenge. That challenge is ongoing as long as the thread is alive and people are interested.

 

This has become tedious, repetitive, and wasteful of (everyone's time) - and well off topic, as mentions of perpetual motion machines indicate, this is for another forum, start a thread on somewhere appropriate with "Hypothesis: All hypotheses need to be tested in order to be disproven (including this one)"

 

 


Edited by ambivalent, 01 May 2025 - 08:53 PM.


#2617 nadaepeu

  • Guest
  • 26 posts
  • 10
  • Location:Europe
  • NO

Posted 01 May 2025 - 09:29 PM

Dear Kelvin and ambivalent,

 

I think that your points are clear enough and we could let the debate rest a bit.

 

It would be much more useful if we could make other users of the protocol to post their results, especially long term users. I am one such user, of both the stem cell and mito protocol. However, I have never done any epigenetic age test so I think my response is going to be rather subjective.

 

Best

 


  • Agree x 2

#2618 ambivalent

  • Guest
  • 788 posts
  • 187
  • Location:uk
  • NO

Posted 01 May 2025 - 10:11 PM

Nadaepeu,

 

You are right and I apologise, and will step back, as I have little further to add to this subject presently. I have undertaken these protocols at times and have experienced benefit. This protocol provided signficant benefit to my arthritic knee (along with NMN, and powerfully fiseting) and I particularly recall the remarkable energy when consu,ing stearic acid on the back of fission (though too much stearic acid can and did prove harmful). But please go ahead and summarise your experiences, along with others - that would be a good way to productively redirect the thread. 



#2619 Kelvin

  • Member
  • 237 posts
  • 37
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 01 May 2025 - 11:19 PM

Dear Kelvin and ambivalent,

 

I think that your points are clear enough and we could let the debate rest a bit.

 

It would be much more useful if we could make other users of the protocol to post their results, especially long term users. I am one such user, of both the stem cell and mito protocol. However, I have never done any epigenetic age test so I think my response is going to be rather subjective.

 

Best

 

Go ahead.

 

I haven't done epigenetic testing either.


Edited by Kelvin, 01 May 2025 - 11:19 PM.


#2620 bullGenteel

  • Member
  • 38 posts
  • 7
  • Location:North
  • NO

Posted 08 May 2025 - 04:12 AM

I was thinking I should go into a little mote detail what I have done for my version of the stem cell protocol, inspired by other user's work. Since I've shared some brief accounts of my experience here and there. A brain injury is really debilitating in all areas of ones life, so I made a personal decision to attempt something that I was pretty uncomfortable about trying. I find I am not very capable at putting plans into action. I kinda wing things. I guess I explained most of what I did:In a post on another thread about stem cells.And here:the mitchondria threadThe fusion agent I said I used, I should have said was 5htp to proliferate stem cells in the frontal cortex.

Edited by bullGenteel, 08 May 2025 - 04:15 AM.


#2621 bullGenteel

  • Member
  • 38 posts
  • 7
  • Location:North
  • NO

Posted 08 May 2025 - 04:16 AM

I feel like I can reflect on what I have tried so far. Ha ha, I remember some line from a cheesy hallmark movie, I caught the end of one time. It felt like I jumped off a cliff and built my wings on the way down to be a little melo-dramatic. I feel I am better off from 6 months of experimenting, but I had some issues even before I had a minor/moderate concussion.

I had some logistical, layperson understanding of some of these protocols but I felt I could understand a little more, as I got into around three months of treatment.

It all started a long-time ago... well almost 2 years ago, if I recall Kelvin made his warning about 5htp could mess up your serotonin receptors. I always wanted to try the c60 protocol, with 5htp no less.

I've had lots of areas in my life to keep me occupied trying to remediate much issues. My brain works a little haphazardly and non linearly. When I read his post I was like cool; wouldn't that be a potential permanent cure for OCD. Than I read it again and thought well a permanent treatment for the symptoms of OCD. I wasn't fully educated myself on harms of SSRI's. Still serotonin seems the best treatment for OCD.

There is a well to do researcher I am aware of, who thinks outside the box. He mentioned a patient with OCD that finds smoking helpful. I've started low dose nicotine lozenges that May help, it's a little early to say. I will mention this same researcher later.

I am pretty sure I also decided on the spot after Kelvin made that post, that I was definitely going to try 5htp. I am a person whose had a mild-moderate concussion whilest also a hypochondriac, so I wasn't in a race to try c60 till I felt comfortable after doing OCD research. I have always had a bad memory but I also planned to wait for Kelvin's update.

I had panic attacks as a teenager, but I remember thinking 4 years ago that at that period of my life I felt, somehow, unexpectedly like I was the most in touch with being a human or some odd notion.

Back to the C60 with 5htp problem. I definitely thought how Kelvin had figured out all the specifics of the negative effects induced by 5htp combined with c60. Then it must be easy to mitigate for these hiccups and still use the protocol. I think this popped into my head when he gave his warning. I don't remember, but I assume. I imagine I thought preliminarly that I could just do the protocol then just take all his remedies afterwards. In the end in may still result in a net postive benefit to my cognitive restoration vs potential damages or negative side effects to be corrected after the fact. I was just floating ideas.

I am ignorant of the science enough to be a little brave about combining extra supplements into these protocols. I understand the guidelines to only include the most necessary elements to prevent potential contra-indications. I may have thought right off the bat, why not take all the remedial supplements before the c60 to hopefully gain some of the restorative benefits while lessening or stopping the upregulation of serotonin receptors and all the bad with it. Or I may have thought take the serotonin blockers some short time after the c60 protocol.

I like to think I did a lot of research like I read some posts by Area1255. I thought that user mentioned something along the lines that dopamine receptors were less easily up or down regulated or something to that point. I eventually just decided like that saying better to stay with the devil you know, based off i Kelvin had figured out all the negative outcomes and how to remediate them.

I did think it might be cool to try c60 with any number of agents but than thought it is better safe than sorry. With a concussion you can be a lot less inhibited than might normally be. I thought of insulin because that may help with cognitive ability. I think my insulin receptors may be down regulated perhaps from some prior negative exposure. I don't know off the top of my head if concussion affects insulin receptors. I am a bit of an endomorph which is probably good for longevity, so if I messed up my insulin receptors could change or have other negative effects.

Having had a brain injury and a lot of personality issues formerly, such as executive functioning issues, anyways led me to overthink with planning, but then not really follow thru fully. I planned to explain to my family doc about needing Propranolol. I didn't even really know propranolol is a blood pressure medication used for stage fright. I have a prescription now, it was a breeze to get. didn't fully understand everything Kelvin wrote prior to today, now I may be able to wrap my head in a general sense around it all a bit better. I won't ever understand the science and logic.

I believe I made one glaring mistake with thinking it's all related to serotonin receptors so I could just take collagen and fulveric acid too be able to get by with put upregulating receptors. I probably missed adrenelin receptors that can mess up blood pressure. I told myself I'd take magnesium, fish oil and I have culturelle yougart already assummed that would be fine.

I think I felt pretty good the first 4 rounds or so over 4 months. I think I experimented taking the collagen and fulveric acid before and after the protocol. After a couple rounds I dropped fulveric acid and kept collagen based off the premise less variables to counteract anything. I got some of the effects others talked about, only if I opted to take collagen after the c60 protocol. I got irritable and feeling brain fog and maybe speed up, but this state would resolve within 45 minutes of taking 6g of collagen.

In the 4th and 5th month I think I pushed back how long I waited to take collagen thinking the intense reaction may signify the C60 and stem cells are working better. This may be why I had some negative outcomes more towards the end of the 5th month. I never felt much, perhaps a mild intense state, as long as I took the collagen an hour or two before the c60 protocol.

I glossed over the comment made to another user's attempts with c60 and NSI-189, with a point made of the intense reaction could be excitology and ensuing damage. I did get a lot of benefits, I alluded to in my other post. But I wasn't very diligent in the weeks in between protocols. I rarely took fish oil but I did take Cacao. I would take like 5 grams of collagen at morning and night on an empty stomach for two weeks after each iteration of the protocol.

But when I had joined this site 2 months ago I had already done both my 4th treatment with no noticeable net benefits, and after the 5th I felt a bit worse off physcially and a little irritable. I say I still retained much of the benefits overall. I'm not the sharpest person to begin with. I felt like fainting or worse one time coming out of the sauna. I believe I was fasting at these times. I read that saunas can mobilize some brain aggregates. I thought it must be that. I would take olive Leaf extract and feel better, having read that olive Leaf can work with autophagy. It can also lower blood pressure, unbeknowst at the time. I sometimes took taurine too with the same switched around guesses as to the cause of my dizziness.

For the past year or so I have been taking tau-protein and amyloid removal protocol roughly daily. I believe that has been beneficial combined with this protocol. I ended up taking theanine, fish oil, and garlic and after 2 weeks I felt a lot better. I did a round of stem cell protocol without 5htp.

I did a medical check up and my blood pressure was 110 over 80. It changed from 120 over 70. I didn't have a blood pressure monitor when I was feeling crappy. I imagined I didn't ask for guidance because I am trying to recover on my own. I also don't perceive this website as being for people to have thier hands held. I also didnt want to get talked out of my experimentation.

I do feel I made some mistakes and it could have went smoother and had been a bit more effective. As I said a brain injury can be severely damaging to quality of life. Maybe in 30 years I might regret experimenting, but I'm not sure, consider an attempt to regain a bearable or greatly increased quality of life for the next 30 years, or hoping.

There is no known treatment for brain trauma. The symptoms can be greatly improved, but far below optimal, however, baring in mind what the long term viability of taking loads of antioxidants and anti-inflammatories.

About 2 weeks ago I decided to take another go at it. I took 5htp 2 days with c60. I took 6 gams collagen an hour or 2 before, an hour after I took propranolol with more collagen. On the second day I took the propranolol an hour before with collagen. I never had any of the brain fog or irritability. I think I could feel a little off during this treatment and for 2 weeks after. I felt best taking 10mg propranolol bi daily for the two weeks post. I continued to take 5g of collagen bi-daily. I measured my blood pressure and it stayed in my normal range.

I feel well enough right now. My next step I guess would be to address senscient cells. I was not very scientific with my approach with stem cells. I get kinda tunnel vision or set on a path, probably partly due to brain injury and being not a very logical person. I took like 3 to 5 days of fusion with 5htp per monthly cycle over the last 6 months.

At the beginning I kinda dabbled with a little of senoytics on fission days, but then I got anxious about that attempt from what I read about mixed reviews and some concerns that the bulk of research is based on mice. I decided to look into whether all my potential senceient cells induced by injury, might be more feasible to fix by pluripotency.
Another consideration i have is about the posssible excitology damage that I may have done over the last 6 months. On top of serotonin upregulation, which I see as remediated on my own by using collagen.

I was just recently thinking about having had panic attacks over a year long period in my teen years. I always felt like I was never the same person after that. I also had insomnia, may or may not have been misdiagnosed with something more severe than OCD. Wasn't quite like night and day change, but moderstely worse off.
I mentioned following a University proffessor/medical researcher. I followed his blog more for like general interest in what he covers more on philosophical basis. He did mention some of his research work, including SSRI's. The posts are vague since it's his personal blog more about society and philosophy rather than academic.

The Proffessor did mention in one post about how SSRI's can just be used for anesthesia purposes. He is against SSRI's and pyschotoroic drugs in general, and an interesting free thinker. I was stumped about that position. Than a year or so ago I learnt that much of his research was based off the work of a head researcher in his field.

This head researcher has an interesting blog too. I don't know if their are studies to be found. The head researcher has an interview where he theorirzes his explanation for post sexual PSSD. The same theory covers why people may not feel themselves after taking these meds. I was thinking of making a post on this site sometime to share his theory because I don't recall seeing it mentioned on this site.

Supposedly the theory goes on about the flooding of serotonin causes damage to fine nerves on the end found at end of extremities and I wonder if fine neurological neurons are affected too?

I have to surmise that may be what the other researcher was alluding too when he mentioned anesthesia. The SSRI's can cauterize neurons and reduce feelings and pain? I may have read that pain killers can offer some relief but perhaps that's from antiinflmmatoey mechanism or I am misremembering. Perhaps you feel some pain from damaged neurofibers. I also remember reading serotonin may give joint pains. Same mechanism, who knows.

Perhaps he just meant it cause psychological pain or else psychological numbing. I don't know I have some deficits at logic. The head researcher mentioned a colleague who never quite felt like himself again till about 3 years off of SSRI's. He stated he believed the nerves of his coleague repaired themselves in that time.

For me after about the 3rd monthly stem cell treatment I think I felt all around a fair amount better, happier and more quicker mentally. I haven't quite regained that, in spite of over all I feel on the whole I feel I am still progressing and made repairs on the whole at a greater level. Perhaps just some fine nerves got frayed or shorted. Maybe some of them have repaired a bit. It maybe power of suggestion I thought for a while my libido may have been negatively affected slightly as well, after the 3rd month. I  Feel pretty well off at the moment now, but I could be better.

I wonder if remyleniation agents could be used for PSSD low sex drive symptoms. Perhaps used with c60, but that is above my pay grade as the saying goes. I did think of the thread started by fafner55 about restoring mild cognitive deficits. I thought of using that protocol in the near future. He uses lions mane as one agent and that has greater NGF potential.

Fafner55 is one the members here, I believe who used NSI-189 or another sertogenic agent with c60. Perhaps I am being too presumptuous, but if he and other users had some excitology effects the protocol, maybe his cognitive restoration treatment restored some of the deleterious effects he may or may not have had, on top of improving what he set out to improve upon with his treatment.

If the c60/sertogenic synergy causes similar damage to myself like it may have done to myself when I had panic attacks and also took some powerful meds as a teenager. This could be similar curcumstances like what is theorized to be some lingering damage from SSRI's proposed by one researcher. I should do some homework to find studies.

I can't wish I could have had someone managing my case for myself these last 6 months or 4 years. I am an adult and made my decision even though the science is still over my head. I have another preexisting condition that I believe I might have wanted to kill 2 birds with one stone with the work i did with c60. Perhaps than I would have been a lot further along with my recovery while conserving stem cell reserves. Maybe my stem cell reserves can replenish on it's own with wishful thinking. I am still considering working on these endeavors.

I only tried my best to follow ideas put forth in this thread. I certainly feel ahead from where I was, but can't help but lament it could have been done more effectively.

I am sure others will see what I did as a little risky and not ideal. Wishful thoughts that I am pretty healthy overall besides the concussion. I have tried to my best with supplements based of studies posted here and my diet and exercise the last 4 years. My sleep could have been better the last 4 years, it was never great. Hopefully I haven't done too much unknown damage to any systems.
  • Informative x 1

#2622 Advocatus Diaboli

  • Guest
  • 611 posts
  • 638
  • Location:Chronosynclastic Infundibulum ( floor Z/p^nZ )
  • NO

Posted 08 May 2025 - 05:35 AM

Or, as an AI might say:

 

bullGenteel reflects on his six-month experimentation with various protocols, particularly combining C60 and 5-HTP, in an attempt to address cognitive and mental health issues stemming from a past concussion, OCD, and teenage panic attacks. Initially optimistic about serotonin-related treatments, he later recognized potential risks, including excitotoxicity and receptor dysregulation, and adjusted his approach by incorporating collagen, propranolol, and other supplements to mitigate side effects like brain fog and blood pressure fluctuations. While acknowledging some benefits—such as improved mood and mental clarity—he admits to a lack of scientific rigor, occasional overconfidence, and unintended consequences, including possible nerve damage akin to SSRI-induced PSSD. Despite setbacks, he believes he has made progress but laments not optimizing his methods earlier. He also explores theories from unconventional researchers about serotonin’s role in nerve damage and considers future steps, including remyelination agents and stem cell therapies, while grappling with the long-term implications of his self-directed experimentation.



#2623 bullGenteel

  • Member
  • 38 posts
  • 7
  • Location:North
  • NO

Posted 09 May 2025 - 06:20 PM

I could probably work on my editing to make a paired down summaries. I did mean to split that last post into two entries. One about my experiences and other about what I may have learned and wanted to do differently. Still might have been too long. I meant to split my last post at "another consideration I have is..."

I don't know if mods can edit my post.
  • like x 1

#2624 Kelvin

  • Member
  • 237 posts
  • 37
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 20 May 2025 - 01:08 AM

Does anyone have experience with using carbon60oliveoil.com as a source for C60?  If you have, do you recommend them as a supplier?

 

https://carbon60oliv...t/c60-capsules/

 

I currently buy C60 capsules dissolved in olive oil from PureC60OliveOil.com off of Amazon.  Unfortunately, the current brand tends to have leaky capsules and I am thinking of changing suppliers.


  • WellResearched x 1

#2625 SenBen

  • Member
  • 11 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Europe

Posted 20 May 2025 - 12:30 PM

Dear Kelvin,

 

unfortunately, I don t use this brand, but I would like to ask you how many capsules of C60 do you take for one daily dose in Stem Cell protocol? (I am planning first to do Mito protocol (for a month) and after that, I would like to do Steam Cell protocol).

 

Thank you


  • like x 1

#2626 joesixpack

  • Guest
  • 519 posts
  • 208
  • Location:arizona
  • NO

Posted 20 May 2025 - 06:34 PM

Does anyone have experience with using carbon60oliveoil.com as a source for C60?  If you have, do you recommend them as a supplier?

 

https://carbon60oliv...t/c60-capsules/

 

I currently buy C60 capsules dissolved in olive oil from PureC60OliveOil.com off of Amazon.  Unfortunately, the current brand tends to have leaky capsules and I am thinking of changing suppliers.

I don't use the capsules, but I have bought their bottled product and found to be great quality.


  • Informative x 1

#2627 lost69

  • Guest
  • 287 posts
  • 51
  • Location:italy

Posted 20 May 2025 - 07:20 PM

Does anyone have experience with using carbon60oliveoil.com as a source for C60?  If you have, do you recommend them as a supplier?

 

https://carbon60oliv...t/c60-capsules/

 

I currently buy C60 capsules dissolved in olive oil from PureC60OliveOil.com off of Amazon.  Unfortunately, the current brand tends to have leaky capsules and I am thinking of changing suppliers.

 

i used tht brand for many years, very good quality for the money. i now use greska carbon 60


  • Informative x 1

#2628 Kelvin

  • Member
  • 237 posts
  • 37
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted Yesterday, 12:41 AM

Dear Kelvin,

 

unfortunately, I don t use this brand, but I would like to ask you how many capsules of C60 do you take for one daily dose in Stem Cell protocol? (I am planning first to do Mito protocol (for a month) and after that, I would like to do Steam Cell protocol).

 

Thank you

 

For the current brand which I buy off Amazon, if the pill is filled properly it ideally should be 4 olive oil pills with 0.8 mgs C60 per capsule (total of 3.2 mgs).

 

However, I usually take 5 or 6 in order to get about 3 mgs of C60 the pills for this brand are sometimes not filled to the top.


i used tht brand for many years, very good quality for the money. i now use greska carbon 60

 

Good to know.

 

Was there a reason you went to greska C60?


Edited by Kelvin, Yesterday, 12:43 AM.


#2629 SenBen

  • Member
  • 11 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Europe

Posted Yesterday, 11:29 AM

Thank you Kelvin


Edited by SenBen, Yesterday, 11:34 AM.

  • Good Point x 1

#2630 lost69

  • Guest
  • 287 posts
  • 51
  • Location:italy

Posted Yesterday, 03:00 PM

For the current brand which I buy off Amazon, if the pill is filled properly it ideally should be 4 olive oil pills with 0.8 mgs C60 per capsule (total of 3.2 mgs).

 

However, I usually take 5 or 6 in order to get about 3 mgs of C60 the pills for this brand are sometimes not filled to the top.


 

Good to know.

 

Was there a reason you went to greska C60?

 

i am not doing any experimental antiaging protocols since many years, about 1.5 year ago i had tachycardia 150bpm and blood pressure 40/60 one time and 150/90 another time, about 3 episodes, then tachycardia every night when going to bed. kind of vax side effects but i never had any vax, only injections of a drug, teriparatide, to push bone repair (i have shoulder osteonecrosis). heart was ok and doctors found nothing, i stopped the drug injections immediately

 

i checked blood under microscope and red blood cells were all sticked together, a lot of exogenous idrogels (graphene) and other stuff. Biologist said i was alive because of the very healthy life style and supplements and she suggested to add greska c60 to my ususal stack of nac+glycine and vit d3+k2 ...about 1 month and tachycardia was gone, so i stopped c60 and it came back so i kept it for about 1 year and rechecked blood: red blood cells were now perfect, moving like an aquarium instead of like all clotted as before, zero exogenous stuff.

 

so i still use that brand of c60 from time to time


Edited by lost69, Yesterday, 03:04 PM.

  • WellResearched x 1

#2631 ambivalent

  • Guest
  • 788 posts
  • 187
  • Location:uk
  • NO

Posted Yesterday, 05:16 PM

i am not doing any experimental antiaging protocols since many years, about 1.5 year ago i had tachycardia 150bpm and blood pressure 40/60 one time and 150/90 another time, about 3 episodes, then tachycardia every night when going to bed. kind of vax side effects but i never had any vax, only injections of a drug, teriparatide, to push bone repair (i have shoulder osteonecrosis). heart was ok and doctors found nothing, i stopped the drug injections immediately

 

i checked blood under microscope and red blood cells were all sticked together, a lot of exogenous idrogels (graphene) and other stuff. Biologist said i was alive because of the very healthy life style and supplements and she suggested to add greska c60 to my ususal stack of nac+glycine and vit d3+k2 ...about 1 month and tachycardia was gone, so i stopped c60 and it came back so i kept it for about 1 year and rechecked blood: red blood cells were now perfect, moving like an aquarium instead of like all clotted as before, zero exogenous stuff.

 

so i still use that brand of c60 from time to time

 

 

Very good to see you back lost, I am sorry to hear about your health challenges, but very glad they have been overcome - and with the help of c60.

 

I was wondering do you know what research supported your biologist's recommendation - or other c60oo anecdotes they have?


  • Good Point x 1





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: c60, stem cells, mitochondria, fusion, stearic acid, aging, hydroxytyrosol, olive oil, mct oil, proliferation

5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users