5 replies to this topic

[RighteousReason]

59% Would Vote to Replace Entire Congress

Sunday, October 05, 2008

If [the American people] could vote to keep or replace the entire Congress, 59% of voters would like to throw them all out and start over again.

from RasmussenReports.com

from MichaelSavage.com

Edited by Savage, 05 October 2008 - 09:44 PM.

[luv2increase]

59% Would Vote to Replace Entire Congress

Sunday, October 05, 2008

If [the American people] could vote to keep or replace the entire Congress, 59% of voters would like to throw them all out and start over again.

from RasmussenReports.com

from MichaelSavage.com

This is sorta odd because the majority of Congress are Democrats.

[RighteousReason]

59% Would Vote to Replace Entire Congress

Sunday, October 05, 2008

If [the American people] could vote to keep or replace the entire Congress, 59% of voters would like to throw them all out and start over again.

from RasmussenReports.com

from MichaelSavage.com

This is sorta odd because the majority of Congress are Democrats.

Why do you think that it is odd?

While the Republican president has had an approval rating only in the teens, the Democratic congress has had an approval rating in the single digits.

[niner]

Most of those 59% believe in angels, but whatever. The question is, what would we replace them with? More of the same? That's what we'll get if we use the exact same method to put them in. If we pass them through the bogus filters where they have to tell us all the lies that we already believe in order to get us to vote for them, what do you expect to get?

[Zenob]

Standard republican operating strategy. When people figure out they are incompentent, dishonest, corrupt, etc, they start flinging mud around to try and make look like everyones been rolling around in the pig pen.

[luv2increase]

Standard republican operating strategy. When people figure out they are incompentent, dishonest, corrupt, etc, they start flinging mud around to try and make look like everyones been rolling around in the pig pen.

Can you back up your extreme rhetoric with proof?