@old_school , you are giving absolutely no reasonable arguments for what you claim.
You are only showing photographs of an light orbs and you are prretending them to be something just like that. You need more evidences to claim whatever for each one of the pictures, that you showed. You are making the evidences to support your claim. The correct is the opposite - your claim to match the evidences.
I told you before - each representation of an orb would have a different expolanation, and it may be everything religeous and non - religeous. So far we excluded a photographic flare, and explained that the halo of the saints is only imaginary and are not a real orbs arrounf the heads of the saints. It seems you don't give up easy from wrong ideas

Why are you so sure, that the above photograph is not a fraud for example?