Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Light Weights Are Just as Good for Building Muscle, Getting Stronger, Researchers Find

light weights training muscle growth stronger repetitions sets

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 CaptainFuture

  • Registered User
  • 64 posts
  • 52
  • Location:Europe

Posted 01 May 2012 - 11:32 AM


There still is some difference but the key seems to be working to the point of fatigue.

http://www.scienceda...20430105358.htm

ScienceDaily (Apr. 30, 2012)

— Lifting less weight more times is just as effective at building muscle as training with heavy weights, a finding by McMaster researchers that turns conventional wisdom on its head.


The key to muscle gain, say the researchers, is working to the point of fatigue.


"We found that loads that were quite heavy and comparatively light were equally effective at inducing muscle growth and promoting strength," says Cam Mitchell, one of the lead authors of the study and a PhD candidate in the Department of Kinesiology.


The research, published in theJournal of Applied Physiology, challenges the widely accepted dogma that training with heavy weights -- which can be lifted only six to 12 times before fatigue -- is the best avenue to muscle growth.


"Many older adults can have joint problems which would prevent them training with heavy loads," says Mitchell. "This study shows that they have the option of training with lighter and less intimidating loads and can still receive the benefits."


For the study, a series of experiments were conducted on healthy, young male volunteers to measure how their leg muscles reacted to different forms of resistance training over a period of 10 weeks.


The researchers first determined the maximum weight each subject could lift one time in a knee extension. Each subject was assigned to a different training program for each leg.


In all, three different programs were used in combinations that required the volunteers to complete sets of as many repetitions as possible with their assigned loads -- typically eight to 12 times per set at the heaviest weights and 25-30 times at the lowest weights.


The three programs used in the combinations were:

  • one set at 80% of the maximum load
  • three sets at 80% of the maximum
  • three sets at 30% of the maximum

After 10 weeks of training, three times per week, the heavy and light groups that lifted three sets saw significant gains in muscle volume -- as measured by MRI -- with no difference among the groups. Still, the group that used heavier weights for three sets developed a bit more strength.


The group that trained for a single set showed approximately half the increase in muscle size seen in both the heavy and light groups.


"The complexity of current resistance training guidelines may deter some people from resistance training and therefore from receiving the associated health benefits," says Stuart Phillips, a professor in the Department of Kinesiology and supervisor of the study. "Our study provides evidence for a simpler paradigm, where a much broader range of loads including quite light loads can induce muscle growth, provided it is lifted to the point where it is difficult to maintain good form."



#2 niner

  • Member, Moderator
  • 14,726 posts
  • 3,592
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 01 May 2012 - 11:39 AM

Wow, that's gonna get some people riled up... 30% of max seems awfully light. At 30% max, I think I'd be there all day. It's nice to know that a lower weight, high rep count approach could work, though; I have a tendon problem that keeps me from doing curls at high weight.

#3 CaptainFuture

  • Registered User
  • 64 posts
  • 52
  • Location:Europe

Posted 01 May 2012 - 01:31 PM

Yes, same here.

#4 platypus

  • Member
  • 1,752 posts
  • 210
  • Location:Italy

Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:17 PM

Ok, so was this study done on trained athletes or what? Ich don't think so, but beginners respond to any kind of training-stimulus.
  • like x 1

#5 CaptainFuture

  • Registered User
  • 64 posts
  • 52
  • Location:Europe

Posted 01 May 2012 - 09:19 PM

I could not access the original study but this study was done by some of the same researchers.

http://www.plosone.o...al.pone.0012033


Low-Load High Volume Resistance Exercise Stimulates Muscle Protein Synthesis More Than High-Load Low Volume Resistance Exercise in Young Men


..."Participants reported engaging in lower body exercise such as resistance exercise alone or in combination with cycling more than 3 times weekly for the prior 6 months."...

#6 lucid

  • Registered User
  • 1,170 posts
  • 64
  • Location:Austin, Tx

Posted 02 May 2012 - 08:11 AM

I hope that they weren't just measuring strength via an MRI. Size increase could be caused more glycogen in muscle tissue... this will not however increase strength... Anyone have the link to the study?

#7 platypus

  • Member
  • 1,752 posts
  • 210
  • Location:Italy

Posted 02 May 2012 - 09:14 AM

What is the "maximum load" they talk about? After 10 weeks of training with heavy sets that "maximum load" should be a lot higher than in the beginning. This probably fully explains their results.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: light weights, training, muscle growth, stronger, repetitions, sets

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users