I think another issue is how one defines "alternative medicine." I googled alternative medicine medical doctors and it seems that doctors supporting supplementation with fish oil and Vitamin D fall in the holistic camp. I am surprised since the benefits of fish oil and Vitamin D are based on actual scientific studies. I don't see why supplementation with ALCAR, R-lipoic Acid, and Curcumin should be considered "alternative medicine" as well. There is ample evidence to back this up. What I consider alternative medicine with contested scientific evidence is chiropractic treatment (although certain aspects may have science backing), acupuncture (I believe this is mostly a placebo effect in people who report benefits), and homeopathy (complete pseudoscience). I also think any doctor who espouses healing the spiritual aspect of a patient is firmly in the alternative camp.
It seems there needs to be a new category designed for medical practitioners who are open to supplementation that has scientific evidence and who approve of biohacking, and the quantified-self movement. There seems to to be a new need for a category of doctors who would espouse many of the practices in LongeCity. Or is the issue that they would be risking their medical license or would be unable to properly bill insurance companies for these cutting edge or experimental treatments (all backed by some scientific data)?
Edited by LucidMind, 08 May 2015 - 07:55 AM.