1
Who's Behind the Navy Yard Shootings?
Posted by
Luminosity
,
in
Politics,
Recommended
18 September 2013
·
1,041 views
navy ship yard
Open and shut case; crazy guy shoots twelve people. The suspect is dead. We don't need to try him. The officials write the narrative. So far, there's not that much to contradict their story of what happened that day.
What would argue against the official narrative? The suspect was a Thai-speaking Buddhist whose good side was known to many people. Why did Aaron Alexis go off, and more importantly, why was he allowed access to the Ship Yard when so many questions had been raised about his sanity? His violent and criminal behaviors were known. They were repeated. How were they missed? Maybe they weren't missed. Maybe someone wanted a volatile person they could set off when the time was right.
His arrests and less than honorable discharge were not hard to find. Police officers were concerned enough to contact the Ship Yard to tell them that Alexis felt that microwaves were being aimed at him to keep him from sleeping. They did not disable his access. He was treated for schizophrenia at a VA hospital. They did not disable his access.
There was a CIA program in the sixties called MK Ultra where they took people who were unstable or made people unstable, and using drugs and programming trained them to kill. Many believe that Sirhan Sirhan, who assassinated Bobby Kennedy, was part of that. Perhaps the CIA or military intelligence looked for people they could put in place and activate them when they needed them to go off. That would explain why so many warning signs were "missed." Alexis might well have been unaware he was being deployed in this way.
Aaron Alexis felt that a group of people were harassing him with microwaves, that voices were coming through the walls and from the closet. That can all be dismissed as mental illness. His story is similar to reports in alternative media on electronic harassment. I've been hearing these stories for years. http://www.coasttoco...ow/2013/08/26 I used to dismiss them but I don't so much anymore. When the military/intelligence agencies get new technologies, they keep that knowledge from the public for as long as they can. We know about drones now, but they probably had them during 9/11 too. Early on some people were saying that the 9/11 planes were unmanned and remote-controlled. I thought that was absurd. Knowing what we now know about drones, it actually makes more sense than the official explanation. Experienced pilots say they would have a hard time doing what the 9/11 hijackers did. It would be almost physically impossible for a pilot to follow the trajectory of the plane that hit the Pentagon. It is now speculated that it was remote-controlled drone and the control might have been in a construction trailer outside that building.
Schizophrenics can be prone to find secret messages in the media or patterns around them. I don't know how many think there are voices in the closet, or coming through the walls. I'm sure some might experience that, but is it just coincidence that this might be technologically possible and fits with the electronic harassment scenarios reported by some observers?
How convenient is it that this attack happened a few miles from the White House and Congress, who will not vote for gun control, and a few days from 9/11? Was it even scheduled for 9/11 but they could not get the guy to go off on cue? Is this an attempt to institute gun control?
Is this a redirect from something else: NSA spying, persecution of whistleblowers, Syria, or something we don't even know about right now? Perhaps Edward Snowden had some more revelations they didn't want us to hear. How better to utterly hijack the national media for a few days?
Around the day of the attack there was a large upsurge in plane traffic where I live, which reminded me of similar increases around the start of the Gulf Wars.
According to a recent guest on Coast to CoastAM Radio mysterious personnel removed nukes from a military base recently. I think this was investigator William Thomas on September 16, 2013 http://www.coasttoco...show/2013/09/16 There is a military exercise scheduled for November. Suspected false flag attacks have happened during military exercises more than once: 9/11, the London subway attacks. The guest was concerned that the nukes were going to be used in a false flag attack during the military exercises in November. Tell everyone you know about this suspicion and shine light on it. That might make them cancel that, if it is being planned.
If this was a staged false flag attack, it can be years before the truth becomes known. From my experience the government doesn't deserve our unquestioning belief. Look at their claims skeptically, and think for yourself.
What would argue against the official narrative? The suspect was a Thai-speaking Buddhist whose good side was known to many people. Why did Aaron Alexis go off, and more importantly, why was he allowed access to the Ship Yard when so many questions had been raised about his sanity? His violent and criminal behaviors were known. They were repeated. How were they missed? Maybe they weren't missed. Maybe someone wanted a volatile person they could set off when the time was right.
His arrests and less than honorable discharge were not hard to find. Police officers were concerned enough to contact the Ship Yard to tell them that Alexis felt that microwaves were being aimed at him to keep him from sleeping. They did not disable his access. He was treated for schizophrenia at a VA hospital. They did not disable his access.
There was a CIA program in the sixties called MK Ultra where they took people who were unstable or made people unstable, and using drugs and programming trained them to kill. Many believe that Sirhan Sirhan, who assassinated Bobby Kennedy, was part of that. Perhaps the CIA or military intelligence looked for people they could put in place and activate them when they needed them to go off. That would explain why so many warning signs were "missed." Alexis might well have been unaware he was being deployed in this way.
Aaron Alexis felt that a group of people were harassing him with microwaves, that voices were coming through the walls and from the closet. That can all be dismissed as mental illness. His story is similar to reports in alternative media on electronic harassment. I've been hearing these stories for years. http://www.coasttoco...ow/2013/08/26 I used to dismiss them but I don't so much anymore. When the military/intelligence agencies get new technologies, they keep that knowledge from the public for as long as they can. We know about drones now, but they probably had them during 9/11 too. Early on some people were saying that the 9/11 planes were unmanned and remote-controlled. I thought that was absurd. Knowing what we now know about drones, it actually makes more sense than the official explanation. Experienced pilots say they would have a hard time doing what the 9/11 hijackers did. It would be almost physically impossible for a pilot to follow the trajectory of the plane that hit the Pentagon. It is now speculated that it was remote-controlled drone and the control might have been in a construction trailer outside that building.
Schizophrenics can be prone to find secret messages in the media or patterns around them. I don't know how many think there are voices in the closet, or coming through the walls. I'm sure some might experience that, but is it just coincidence that this might be technologically possible and fits with the electronic harassment scenarios reported by some observers?
How convenient is it that this attack happened a few miles from the White House and Congress, who will not vote for gun control, and a few days from 9/11? Was it even scheduled for 9/11 but they could not get the guy to go off on cue? Is this an attempt to institute gun control?
Is this a redirect from something else: NSA spying, persecution of whistleblowers, Syria, or something we don't even know about right now? Perhaps Edward Snowden had some more revelations they didn't want us to hear. How better to utterly hijack the national media for a few days?
Around the day of the attack there was a large upsurge in plane traffic where I live, which reminded me of similar increases around the start of the Gulf Wars.
According to a recent guest on Coast to CoastAM Radio mysterious personnel removed nukes from a military base recently. I think this was investigator William Thomas on September 16, 2013 http://www.coasttoco...show/2013/09/16 There is a military exercise scheduled for November. Suspected false flag attacks have happened during military exercises more than once: 9/11, the London subway attacks. The guest was concerned that the nukes were going to be used in a false flag attack during the military exercises in November. Tell everyone you know about this suspicion and shine light on it. That might make them cancel that, if it is being planned.
If this was a staged false flag attack, it can be years before the truth becomes known. From my experience the government doesn't deserve our unquestioning belief. Look at their claims skeptically, and think for yourself.
