• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

16 out of 18 brands failed NMN testing - June 2024

nmn urolithin study nad nad+

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
6 replies to this topic

#1 Anthony_Loera

  • Life Member
  • 3,169 posts
  • 748
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 28 June 2024 - 03:34 PM


New June 2024 study:

Shows 16 out of 18 brands of NMN failed

to have enough NMN in products.

 

They also tested Urolithin A where 2 out of 4 brands of Urolithin A failed to provide enough.

 

Open Access Study Is Available Here:

https://link.springe...357-024-01257-2

 

or here

Attached File  NMN Study - 0282024 on products- s11357-024-01257-2x.pdf   576.92KB   20 downloads

 

 

RevGenetics is NMN #7 

in this study, and one of two brands that actually provided quality NMN.

 

Attached File  NMN Data from study.png   353.42KB   1 downloads

 

 


  • Informative x 3
  • like x 1

#2 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,320 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 28 June 2024 - 05:35 PM

Congratulations Anthony. I know you are rigorous about testing at your company. Keep up the good work.


  • like x 2

#3 QuestforLife

  • Member
  • 1,591 posts
  • 1,171
  • Location:UK
  • NO

Posted 22 July 2024 - 11:03 AM

16/18 NMN brands had less than claimed, but I wouldn't say 16 'failed'. If you claim 1000mg and your result is 978mg (say), that is probably within a tolerable margin of variability.

 

But some did unambiguously fail: 2 brands had no NMN in and one had 86% less than claimed. 

 

Although inconvenient to take, powder looks like the safest option (but not liposomal).  


  • Good Point x 2

#4 Gal220

  • Guest
  • 1,062 posts
  • 640
  • Location:United States

Posted 30 July 2024 - 06:53 AM

16/18 NMN brands had less than claimed, but I wouldn't say 16 'failed'. If you claim 1000mg and your result is 978mg (say), that is probably within a tolerable margin of variability.

 

But some did unambiguously fail: 2 brands had no NMN in and one had 86% less than claimed. 

 

Although inconvenient to take, powder looks like the safest option (but not liposomal).  

 

Some posters had very good results from the liposomal sublingual gel from renew by science

https://www.longecit...curcumin/page-2

 

Why do you feel they are unsafe?

 

 

Liposomes are easiest way to get a product into the cell, some discussion in this article

https://www.wholefoo...enous-vitamin-c



#5 QuestforLife

  • Member
  • 1,591 posts
  • 1,171
  • Location:UK
  • NO

Posted 30 July 2024 - 08:46 AM

Some posters had very good results from the liposomal sublingual gel from renew by science

https://www.longecit...curcumin/page-2

 

Why do you feel they are unsafe?

 

 

 

When I said safest option, I meant the safest bet in terms of getting any NMN. 

 

The liposomal mix in the table in the discussed paper had poor amounts of NMN. 


Edited by QuestforLife, 30 July 2024 - 08:47 AM.

  • Good Point x 1
  • like x 1

#6 Gal220

  • Guest
  • 1,062 posts
  • 640
  • Location:United States

Posted 31 July 2024 - 07:15 AM

When I said safest option, I meant the safest bet in terms of getting any NMN. 

 

The liposomal mix in the table in the discussed paper had poor amounts of NMN. 

 

Thanks for posting

 

The post I referenced is a bit old now

 

Probably best for the retail section now, but for those who have tried various products, which one gives the best results in terms of better energy?

https://www.longecit...ndpost&p=929044

 

 

I still cycle Renue by Science's sublingual gel, but at my age it is hard to know how much benefit I am getting


Edited by Gal220, 31 July 2024 - 07:17 AM.


#7 Repack Racing

  • Guest
  • 71 posts
  • 31
  • Location:Fairfax, CA
  • NO

Posted 08 November 2024 - 02:00 AM

A few years ago someone did an NMN test that was published on one of the threads here - I can't remember which.  In that test, ProHealth was one of the best.  That's what I still use.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: nmn, urolithin, study, nad, nad+

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users