• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Are NAD+ precursors worth taking at this stage in the science?

nad+

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
No replies to this topic

#1 osris

  • Guest
  • 596 posts
  • 101

Posted Today, 06:47 PM


The clinical science for NAD+ precursors is still in its slow and steady phase. 
 
Research has confirmed that taking NMN (Nicotinamide Mononucleotide) or NR (Nicotinamide Riboside) effectively raises NAD⁺ levels in the blood. However, there is a gap in the science.
 
We can boost NAD+ levels but don’t yet know if this actually slows the biological clock or extends human lifespan. Most longevity claims are extrapolated from mice and yeast, which don’t always translate to humans.
 
Many successful clinical trials use between 500 mg and 2000 mg per day to see a significant physiological change. Even with a high dose, NAD+ molecules are fragile. If the supplement isn't formulated well, much of it can be broken down by the digestive system before it ever reaches your cells.

So is it worth taking them, especially given how expensive they are?

  • unsure x 1
  • Good Point x 1





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: nad+

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users