Resveratrol extends lifespan in mice and health
#211
Posted 25 January 2007 - 01:27 AM
It is on the website and has been for a while:
Longevinex Product Ordering
#212
Posted 25 January 2007 - 02:04 PM
#213
Posted 25 January 2007 - 07:25 PM
I've found these two case studies (and more):
http://ndt.oxfordjou.../full/19/7/1916
http://www.ncbi.nlm....3&dopt=Abstract
This information has made me very wary of taking resveratrol supplements containing emodin for any length of time.
Anyone with any insights?
#214
Posted 25 January 2007 - 08:34 PM
Another pubmed link to look at.
"Emodin has the effect of promoting liver regeneration and improving liver function in rats after reduced size transplantation. The possible mechanism is improving proliferation of liver cell and protecting liver cells from injury."
http://www.ncbi.nlm....2&dopt=Abstract
#215
Posted 25 January 2007 - 10:07 PM
Does anyone have any good references with regard to the renal effects of emodin? Some toxicity info is here: http://ntp.niehs.nih...473662E6EA1FB05
I'm not sure how this translates into anything meaningful with respect to the amounts present in resveratrol supplements.
I've got three bottles of the Solaray Resveratrol, which I'm not sure I'm going to take at this point. Which supplements do not have emodin?
#216
Posted 25 January 2007 - 10:24 PM
"Groups of 65 male and 65 female rats were fed diets containing 0, 280, 830, or 2,500 ppm emodin (equivalent to average daily doses of approximately 110, 320, or 1,000 mg/kg to males and 120, 370, or 1,100 mg/kg to females) for 105 weeks."
Conclusions copied for the lazy:
"Under the conditions of these 2-year feed studies, there was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of emodin in male F344/N rats exposed to 280, 830, or 2,500 ppm. There was equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity of emodin in female F344/N rats based on a marginal increase in the incidence of Zymbal's gland carcinoma. There was equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity of emodin in male B6C3F1 mice based on a low incidence of uncommon renal tubule neoplasms. There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of emodin in female B6C3F1 mice exposed to 312, 625, or 1,250 ppm.
Exposure of rats to emodin resulted in increased incidences of renal tubule hyaline droplets and pigmentation in males, increased incidences of renal tubule hyaline droplets in females, and increased severities of renal tubule pigmentation in males and females. Emodin exposure resulted in increased incidences of renal tubule pigmentation in male and female mice and increased incidences of nephropathy in female mice.
Incidences of mononuclear cell leukemia decreased in male and female rats exposed to 2,500 ppm"
#217
Posted 26 January 2007 - 03:42 AM
Thanks for the link. I may have been too hasty with my judgement regarding hepatotoxicity, which isn't necessarily directly tied to emodin itself, but another anthraquinone. Although emodin in conjunction with other substances, perhaps NSAIDS, may possibly have the same effect.
Does anyone have any good references with regard to the renal effects of emodin? Some toxicity info is here: http://ntp.niehs.nih...473662E6EA1FB05
I'm not sure how this translates into anything meaningful with respect to the amounts present in resveratrol supplements.
I've got three bottles of the Solaray Resveratrol, which I'm not sure I'm going to take at this point. Which supplements do not have emodin?
There is an informative post on emodin with references on the morelife group by Paul Wakfer:
http://health.groups...fe/message/1339
The question is the dose. I was very unhappy with 250 mg of emodin a day. Paul has said he can tolerate 300 mg. I find 50 to 100 mg of emodin is still an effective laxative. Some people say they get used to the amount in their resveratrol supplements. IF you ramp up your dose, or combine low emodin Resv with higher emodin supplements, and you find it tolerable, I'd say go ahead and use it.
If it were not for the (undesired) laxative effect it would be beneficial. Perhaps a little of it is a good thing. Some of the benefits documented by Paul include:
increases glucose uptake in 3T3-Ll cells
blocks the SARS coronavirus spike protein and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 interaction.
anti-cariogenic
Antidiabetic
treats murine nonalcoholic fatty liver induced by high caloric laboratory chow.
#218
Posted 26 January 2007 - 04:33 AM
- Essentially if someone stopped taking it for a length of time would there be an adverse reaction?
#219
Posted 26 January 2007 - 09:04 AM
ISTM cycling of any preparation containing significant emodin would result in more issues (bowel motility variability), given my experience so far, anyway.
#220
Posted 31 January 2007 - 06:43 PM
#221
Posted 31 January 2007 - 10:54 PM
#222
Posted 01 February 2007 - 01:30 AM
#223
Posted 01 February 2007 - 07:11 AM
And check out the affiliate program on the RevGenetics site. Using paydotcom.com I see. Can someone say fishy? I mean, even the website looks like it was put together by a two year old. And I just noticed that the site makes some untrue claims on its FAQ page: "provides the best price per milligram of Resveratrol". Sorry, but there are cheaper places to get resveratrol than RevGenetics.
Im guessing I could find even more questionable material on RevGenetics, but Im bored and definitely not buying from this company. RevGenetics (and saxiephon) will have to do a better job if they are going to convince people they are legit.
And you know, I am truly sorry if this is for real, but honestly there are so many red flags that it is unbelievable. Good luck.
.... bull crapThis company seems genuinely interested in customer requirements.
#224
Posted 01 February 2007 - 03:57 PM
#225
Posted 02 February 2007 - 01:22 AM
"Our capsules have a high amount of Resveratrol, as we have looked at the various studies and found no capsules being offered with the equivalent amount of Resveratrol as reported by the scientific studies."
"One capsule per 50lbs of personal weight per day. (Example: A 200lb man would take 4 pills a day)"
200 lbs = ~90 kg. 4 tabs @ 500 mg/tab rsv = 2 grams rsv. 22 mg/kg approximates the higher of the dosages given experimental animals, and way more than the lower level intake Sinclair claims to be using....
And I thought I might be pushing it at 10 mg/kg/day....
#226
Posted 05 April 2007 - 09:35 PM
#227
Posted 05 April 2007 - 10:33 PM
#228
Posted 06 April 2007 - 01:26 AM
#229
Posted 12 April 2007 - 08:55 PM
Looks like a $40 lesson in dealing with shady internet peddlers.
#230
Posted 12 April 2007 - 09:12 PM
I received my resveratrol within 5 days.
Paul.
#231
Posted 12 April 2007 - 09:12 PM
#232
Posted 12 April 2007 - 09:21 PM
#233
Posted 23 April 2007 - 07:33 PM
It is nearly May and I have yet to receive my order. About a month ago they sent me a 'free' bottle in an attempt to placate me. The label didnt fit on the bottle and was smudged. Against my better judgement I took them anyways. I didnt notice any ill effects so I am hoping it was actually resveratrol in the caps and not something else. [:o]
Anyways, I spoke repeatedly with James Betz who is supposedly a Director at the company requesting my product or my money back. To date I have not received either.
#234
Posted 24 April 2007 - 08:01 AM
James has been rapidly responsive to all my inquiries regarding Bioforte, and I received my shipment of the product (although that was weeks/months ago at this point) without a hitch.
#235
Posted 01 June 2007 - 06:05 AM
ASPIRIN does not appear to prevent mortality from strokes or heart attacks. [American Journal of Cardiology Online August 2006]
#236
Posted 01 June 2007 - 06:18 AM
biotivia.com's TRANSMAX: 500mg of 98% standardized knotweed making 490mg Trans Resveratrol per each green Licap Vcap. So, even vegans can take, too. Comes out within 30 days. Only $1.30 per Vcap so way cheaper than Longevinex especially for dosage being 5 times per Vcap:
http://www.biotivia....max/default.php
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007
From: "James Betz" <James@bioflu.com>
Subject: Re: 5 questions on Transmax.
It will ship from Kansas City. James
>--- James Betz <James@biotivia.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your inquiry and for your very helpful
> > information. Please see my replies below:
1. What's the prices on it ?
> >
> > It is $79.95 per bottle of 60 Vcaps of 500mg each.
> >
> >
> > >2. How many mg of trans resveratrol per Licap Vcap
> > ?
> >
> > 500mg
> >
> >
> > >3. So, would be 490mg of trans resveratrol since
> > >standardized at 98% ?
> >
> > It is actually closer to 99%.
> >
> >
> > >4. What date will it start shipping ?
> >
> > In one month from now or sooner. I have obtained
> > all approvals to manufacture, have procured the
> > 99% material and need only to finalize the
> > packaging and a few processing details.
> >
> > >5. What's all the ingredients including other
> > >ingredients ?
> >
> > No other ingredients whatsoever.
> >
> > Thanks again, James
#237
Posted 01 June 2007 - 06:38 AM
Dr. Andrew Weil now recommends no supplemental calcium for men and no more than 700mg of supplemental calcium for women daily. [Dr. Andrew Weil's, Self Healing, Aug 2006, p.5]
Men who consumed more than 600mg of calcium daily had a 32% higher risk of prostate cancer than those who consumed no more than 150mg of calcium a day over 11 years. [American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Oct. 2001] "One possible explanation is that too much calcium reduces the body's level of vitamin D in its active form, which has been shown to inhibit prostate cancer cells from growing in size and number," says Dr. Walter Willett.[Dr. Andrew Weil's Self Healing, Aug. 2006, p. 4]
"More than 800mg of calcium a day from food or vitamin supplements (800mg is the US average from food alone) may be unnecessary as long as vitamin D levels are normal."[JAMA Nov. 9, 2005] "To me, this shows that the main issue with calcium is absorbing it and using it, rather than not getting enough in. Vitamin D is the key to absorbing and using calcium."[Dr. Andrew Weil's, Self Healing, Feb 2006, p.4]
SUPPLEMENTAL CALCIUM CAN MAKE MENS RISK OF PROSTATE CANCER SKYROCKET.[MENS HEALTH MAGAZINE, MAR 2007, P.72]
A Journal says Calcium citrate doesn't need stomach acid for absorption. Citrate form also would be the least likely calcium type to encourage kidney stones.
High-dose Calcium interferes with the absorption of other minerals such as magnesium and zinc. [Nutrition Reviews 55:1-9,1997]
A high ratio of calcium over magnesium blood serum and cerebrospinal fluid is observed in depressed patients. [Neuropsychobiology 39:63-70,1999]
Nature's natural calcium channel bloccker is magnesium and totally rocks:
Only 4% of magnesium oxide is absorbed. [Magnesium Research 14:257-62,2001]
Magnesium inhibits the enzymes that breakdown collagen.[Atherosclerosis 166: 271-277, 2003]
"Look for amino acid chelation-even better, glycinated amino acid chelation."[Earl Mindell's Vitamin Bible For The 21st Century Book, 1999, p. 258]
In this study, people weren't supplementing with calcium. Just at least 50mg of magnesium. Calcium and magnesium compete as magnesium is a natural calcium channel blocker. Therefore, any men's multi ideally should have no calcium according to Dr. Weil, and at least 50mg according to the above referenced study !
Magnesium glycinate is least likely to cause loose stools. Magnesium citrate is most likely to inhibit kidney stones, but 120mg of IP6 inhibits kidney stones too.
PEOPLE TAKING AT LEAST "50MG" OF MAGNESIUM SUPPLEMENTS DAILY WERE 22% LESS LIKELY TO HAVE ELEVATED CRP LEVELS.[NUTRITION RESEARCH 2006, 26(3):193-196]
1 IN 3 AMERICANS HAVE HIGH CRP LEVELS.[JOURNAL CLINICAL HYPERTENSION 6(2004(10)PP.562-568]
HIGH LEVELS OF MAGNESIUM WERE ASSOCIATED WITH A 40% DECREASE IN ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY RISK.[ EPIDEMIOLOGY VOL.17,NO.3, MAY 2006]
"MAGNESIUM COULD HELP YOU LIVE LONGER. MEN WITH THE HIGHEST BLOOD LEVELS OF THE MINERAL HAVE A 40% LOWER RISK OF EARLY DEATH THAN THOSE WITH THE LOWEST LEVELS." [MENS HEALTH MAGAZINE, MAR. 2007, P. 44]
"A NEW STUDY IN THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, PEOPLE LOW ON MAGNESIUM ARE UP TO TWO TIMES MORE LIKELY TO HAVE ELEVATED CRP LEVELS THAN THOSE MEETING THEIR QUOTA.'[MENS HEALTH MAGAZINE, FEB 2006, P.117]
Study noted that individuals with higher magnesium
levels generally had a stronger hand grip, more power
in their legs and were able to extend their knees and
ankles with more force. Dr. Dominguez, who headed up
the study, noted that 68% of adults get less than the
recommended daily allowance of magnesium. Magnesium and muscle performance.[Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Aug;84(2):419-26]
"Magnesium-more than 350mg a day reduced colon cancer by 25%."[Prevention Magazine, Jan. 2007, p.140]
"There is also evidence that magnesium (200mg daily) reduces water retention and bloating."[Prevention Magazine, Sep. 2005, p. 179]
#238
Posted 01 June 2007 - 07:58 AM
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007
From: "James Betz" <James@bioflu.com>
Subject: Re: 2 more questions on Transmax
1. Our caps are all vegetable two piece capsules filled with pure
extract, which is a powder in its natural form. We have no liquid in
our product.
2. The caps are called Vcaps, not Licaps.
Hope this is helpful. Kind regards, James
6/1/2007, you wrote:
>1. So, your Licaps aren't liquid like Longevinex &
>Longevital ? If so, what's the carrier. Longevinex
>uses rice bran oil, and Longevital uses extra virgin
>olive oil.
>
>2. The Vcaps are Capsugel Licaps from Pfizer, right ?
#239
Posted 01 June 2007 - 08:04 AM
Resveratrol is more stable with grape seed extract.[Journal Medicinal Food 9 (1) 2006, 11-14]
"Faithfully take just 100mg a day of resveratrol to add up to 10 years to your life. The compound lowered the risk of breast and colon cancer by as much as 80%. Lowers your risk of heart attack by 52%." [WOMEN'S WORLD, JUN 22 2004]
#240
Posted 01 June 2007 - 05:13 PM
it's close, but that is not the best price you can get for Country life. You can get is at about 0.93 cents per 500mg (5 capsules), of course RevGenetics is the same price with less capsules to take:
http://www.imminst.o...&f=6&t=15059&s=
Anthony
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users