yet I ensure the health of many
Surely more people buy from 1FAST400 than they do from Smi2le, regardless of which one considers to be the superior company. If we establish as a primary goal the ensuring of health amongst supplement/nootropic ingesters, than certainly we will want to test the products which more people ingest. Consequently, within this framework of selfless transcendence towards the health of many, you should be most eager to test 1FAST400's products than Smi2le's.
Let me address one of the main concerns of yours for testing these products, namely, that you cannot ensure that the product he sends to you is that which he sources from China. While this is a legitimate concern, it presupposes a conspiratorial situation in which he stocks "pure products" for moments which dictate the need for independent, third party lab testing. This, in turn, implies that Mike would know he is selling contaminated products. A much more likely hypothetical situation would be one in which he is either selling products which he does not know to have contaminants, or he is selling products which are free from such chemical intrusions. If we assume the former, then you would be doing the supplement-ingesting community a great deed in exposing a source of contaminated products and therefore help ensure the health and longevity of this group of people. If the latter situation is the case, then the only thing to do would be to do what is done is most scientific communities: admit incorrect presumptions.
Another point you had made about this topic is that though you could not prove (at the time, now of course you can) that 1FAST400's products are contaminated with heavy metals, 1FAST400 on the other hand could not prove that they did not. However, as is a well known rule of logic, one cannot prove a universal negative. The burden of proof is on the person stating the positive existence of any particular thing or governing rule. Of course supplement providers bear a burden to ensure product purity within the realm of consumer-business relations, however they can surely not have omniscient knowledge of all products at all times and there respective chemical constituents. Reasonable measures are taken to ensure that products are pure, such as having products tested once they come in from overseas. However, to expect a company to prove that all products at all times are universally and absolutely free from any ingredient not stated would be an exercise in futility. A company can give a guarantee of that nature, but they cannot give unequivocal proof in a universal way.
Smi2le has brought very good things to the market place, and it is relatively reasonable that you take safety in the fact that you know you can test any of his products at any time and receive store credit in compensation for testing costs. This is surely a good thing. Given the tone of discussion within this and other threads, and in particular your comments towards 1FAST400 with respect to contamination of products, I think that the effort involved in going through the procedure of testing his products would be of a lesser intensity than the energy you have put forth via the written word with respect to this topic.
I know you pride yourself on not caring what other people think of you and not "conforming" to other's expectations. However, this is not a matter of "proving yourself" to others, it is a matter of putting effort towards a cause which you personally have at many times dedicated yourself. If you are really serious about ensuring the quality of supplements and nootropics (which is surely a noble cause) then any reasonable observer would expect that you make your words co-extensive with your actions - a true sign of character and moral solidity. If you truly believe that people ingesting 1FAST400's supplements are endangering their lives, then surely you care enough about their lives to commit to an action which could spare thousands of people from possible contamination. The benefits in this case clearly outweigh the risks - if contaminants are found, you receive a thousand dollar check from Mike. If they are free from contaminants, you still get compensated for the cost of the testing and have (in both cases) done a great service to the supplement ingesting community, which is in continuity with your stated cause and goals concerning this industry. If you refuse, it is difficult to escape the conclusion that you believe the risk of being proved incorrect heavily outweighs the benefit of sharing knowledge about a supplier's products and their purity. The latter case would be disappointing and would enjoin within the millions of those who advocate causes but shirk away from opportunities in which to prove that their words are consistent with their actions. This is unfortunately the vast majority, and I would expect a person of high moral conviction to avoid that mass of inactive and intellectually impotent class of men.
I have tried to be as thorough as possible to avoid miscommunication on this topic. I feel that you would benefit greatly from reading what I have written and contemplating its possible implications for your stated position.
Valeo quod prospicio
This topic is locked
He knows that. 
