I'm christian and I am extremely interested in scientific news, methods, and ideas. Quite a generalization you're making it seems.
Awesome!
It is one thing to lie to someone and say that you are of another faith but why couldn't you open the dialogue about God to a religious person. Socratic method is the best way to question oneself the and the world around you. You wouldn't have made that generalization had you talked with more religious people I don't think.
I think that my previous experience associated with religious christian people has been influenced by their ignorance and disgust for my interests, whatever their interest in my beliefs have been, they have been met with resistance when I've followed them up with further queries and questions, answers to questions that they've asked that I've made have made them only angrier. My friendship with them has been shallow.
I think you are picky. But I see it moreso in the sense of your lack of desire to know people, to question them, to be curious. Human physiology is so unique to every individual, which is why I wasn't awake in 1979 but in 1986.
I've seen religious people discredit a perfectly valid belief of Carl Sagan's purely because he doesnt believe in god.
I've seen complete strangers (religious or not) discredit my scientific ideas because they think that I'm a loser because of the way I've dressed in the past.
I've seen teachers teach complete and utter rubbish to a complete crowd of people because in Australia at least you cannot ever question authority, and make a suggestion.
Oh I want to know people like I want to get a bad disease. There is nothing wrong with a healthy sense of isolationism.
And despite how stupid people act around me, despite all of the stupid things that they say, I still get out and meet people.
But every single time I open my mouth and share my viewpoints, they instantly and immediatley stereotype me, and then I'm finished talking to them, if I ever talk to them again its met with resistance and ignorance "You're an idiot", etc.
You say others aren't being realistic about the future, but you will first have to prove to others that we are indeed immortal, considering our cells can only divide 52 times.
You gotta start somewhere. and no I do not need to prove anything to anyone, other people or you are not my judge, jury or executioner, I am an independent human being and this is a viewpoint of mine.
Would you discredit the idea that every single member on this forum should go through basic Nurse training for the time when a fellow immortalist is identified in public when there is nobody else around, potentially saving their lives in knowing exactly what to do? Why hasnt that come up yet?
Thats what I mean by being realistic, I personally believe that this earth is going to be going through some significant changes in the future yet I see that nobody here is a prepper, by being prepared you are hedging that the future is going to be dim, thats what I mean by being realistic. and no I'm not one of the crazy ones.
Alcor may still be around, other cryogenic companies may be aswell, even if we have a post-apocalyptic scenario. These are my viewpoints about the future, they arent necesserially yours or anyone elses. and they dont have to be. But people do need to realise what someone is getting into when they fall in love with me.
I know I'm going to die someday, with so many risks in this world it is an inevitability, but if I die then I will want to be resurrected, my partner is going to have to have the courage to do that, have the knowledge of what to do, and have the ability to do it, seconds count. Not sit there and weep.
Oh, and to answer your second question, yes I do think Australia is as outdated and obsolete as you think it is. Not to mention suffering from the effects of isolation.
Nods. Especially about isolation.
Edited by Layberinthius, 15 November 2013 - 09:35 AM.