Thanks for the list, robertp. I looked through these for evidence of shortcuts, and if you believe what they say, some would seem better than others--
â—Ź carbon60oliveoil says, "We produce C60 Fullerene olive oil exactly as prepared in the study."
â—Ź Bucky Labs gives their procedure, which is the same as in the original study.
â—Ź Vaughter Wellness says, "This is the exact same preparation as used in the original rat study. "
----------------------------------
â—Ź Good and Cheap says, "We use 99.9% Carbon 60 from SES, as we find the difference between 99.9% and 99.95% is negligible." Maybe so, but the higher level is "vacuum oven dried" and therefore free of toluene.
â—Ź RevGenetics does not provide any info on the procedure or C60 source, but has previously offered to dissolve C60 using a method that took just an hour or so--ie, not the method used in the original study.
â—Ź Life-Elixers C60 Oil claims to use 99.95% C60, but does not describe the procedure. The also say, "FDA approval pending," which seems unlikely.
â—Ź SES makes C60 and uses the highest quality and thus would seem to be the ideal supplier. However they do not give their procedure. Word is they are using a shortcut that may produce a different spectrum of adducts.
Edited by Turnbuckle, 18 January 2016 - 12:23 PM.
