I got a few questions:
1. Base on the first study by yadayada, it seem d-deprenyl has a bigger risk of been addictive, is this right?
"These results indicate that d-deprenyl, but not l-deprenyl, may have abuse potential."
2. Is it going to be much more expensive then the L form?
3. Will it bee a good idea to comine L-deprenyl + D-deprenyl or D-deprenyl + BPAP?
4. It seem D-deprenyl is better for nootropic, but which one is better for PD, antiaging, and mood?
1. Almost any psychostimulant has abusive potential. This is nothing to be afraid over-- if this ever does come to market, most users will be taking it in low dosages. Many people take substances (e.g, methylphenidate, amphetamine) that have abuse potential in therapeutic dosages without becoming addicted. Furthermore, it acts as a prodrug to the amphetamine metabolites, meaning you cannot use a faster route of administration for the sake of producing a euphoric effect. Additionally, sublingual administration will reduce the abuse potential by reducing the number of amphetamine metabolites. The abuse potential, outside of the amphetamine metabolites, seem to come from the fact that d-deprenyl acts as a DRI.
The previous poster, Ultravioletbllc, is incorrect. The reason it is not available is because this drug was originally used for parkinson's disease, and l-deprenyl is a more potent MAO-B-I which is more useful when paired with other things (levodopa for instance). There are substances that are even stronger candidates for abuse that are still produced.
The human equivalent dose in the studies with abuse potential, would be very high. Correct me if I'm wrong but on the high end 3mg/kg for squirrel monkeys translates to a human dose equivalence of 0.973 mg/kg, which is extremely high. 10x higher than the typical human dose.
2. Synthesized or compared to existing prices of l-deprenyl? They will cost roughly the same price to synthesize; the only difference is the end enantiomer. Existing L-Deprenyl is exponentally cheaper due to it's widespread use.
3. I would be cautious with this combination but it really would not be that bad. The only danger I see is a stronger potentiation of the amphetamine metabolites due l-deprenyl being a stronger MAO-B inhibitor.
4. It is difficult to say. There is research showing that l-deprenyl is effective for PD treatment and has been used in life-extension experiments with rats. Sublingual administration, L-deprenyl is probably better for life extention due to the fact that d-deprenyl acts as a DRI; the sublingual administration would reduce the negative parasympathetic effects of the levoamphetamine metabolites of l-deprenyl which are probably detrimental to life extention.