i agree, just be cause you seek longevity doesn't mean you have to be so up tight all the time. if what he is saying upsets you so bad prove him wrong scientifically
isochroma leaving longecity was one of the worst things thats happened to this site. don't make the same mistake twice
thats what i like about this forum compared to others related to supplements and longevety. the mods here are not as uptight and i sure hope it continues this way. variety of opinions and personalities expressed is a great thing for any forum. even trolling is ok if its funny and harmless. 
You guys dont get my point at all. I'm also glad that this forum isnt all bent on proving every assumption/adecdote/theory with hard science. Contrary to many "epistemology nazis" I dont think anecdotes are worthless, and creative thoughts are more than welcome. I read a lot of contributions from "scientifically illiterate" users with great interest. One definitely should not need to have a scientific degree to be allowed to contribute to this forum, even when attempting to reason scientifically - as long as he remains humble doing so. Plus I know first handedly that "studies" arent foolproof and you shouldnt be so arrogant to think that you should prove everything with "science" (google fluoroquinolone toxicity syndrome, I'm yet another victim of these "safe" abx - and I'm not seeking longevity, but trying to regain some decent health). I beleive in the great worth of TCM and ayurveda and deeply regret the arrogance of western medecine. And yes isochroma was an amazing asset to to this forum. But have you ever seen him try to make his rants pass as authoritative hard science with approximative pubmed quotes? (well he didnt need to pretend to be a genius scientist, he was a god...) How dare you compare his magnificent prose to this poorly written stack of wannabe scientist crap? DearMrClock you've been "feeding the troll" throughout this thread giving this guy appraisal because you obviously were impressed by the phoney scientific veneer [
"he initiates amazing discussions, arguments and quite well skilled in it"-- holy crap I'm speechless].. You've been fooled and now are having a hard time accepting it. Now please dont turn on me because I'm exposing him..while not being the slightest "emotional" doing so as you like to beleive... I'm actually mildy irritated but also quite amused doing this.. I'm just not into using smilies to prove my "emotional state" so you can attribute whatever tone to my lil rants.
Adaptogen, again I'm not seeking longevity, but quite desperately trying to get some decent health back, and this is one of the few places on the internet where I can find mostly scientifically minded information while still leaving room for anecdotes and more "alternative" theories, a great mix indeed. I absolutely cannot limit myself to hard "proven" science (in the demanding "medical" standard of double-blind randomized-repeated-long term studies sense) which has proven mostly helpless for us "floxies". But I do have a problem when ppl such as anagram of wcaaguy allow themselves to state hastily elaborated speculations as scientific facts just because they have skimmed though some pubmed or wikipedia articles. Come on anagram keeps appointing himself as a "genius", posting "brilliant" ideas when his utter ignorance is blatant when you start to look just a little closer. If you dont take the time to look a little closer you can get fooled pretty easily... I wasnt even cirticizing the mods whom are doing a great job here (niner's couple of cold, scientific responses to a few of anagram's post should be enough to open ppls eyes), just lamenting the fact that they cannot possibly have the time to keep up with anagram's prolificacy to "
prove him wrong scientifically" after each one of his posts. In effect anagram absolutely IS dumbing this forum down and possibly misleading the more naive ppl with his arrogance. You guys definitely should have a problem with this too.
Edited by daouda, 10 December 2012 - 11:22 AM.